https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I found the DEC F77 reference. I wanted to capture this somewhere for future
reference:
o MESSAGE: Extension to FORTRAN-77: nonstandard FORMAT
statement item
EXPLANATION: The following format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98797
--- Comment #1 from Brian Sobulefsky
---
I have updated the repository I linked previously so that it has current gcc
sources and also includes a solution for the case where struct s2 is not a
single field, that is, we have something like:
stru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897
Bug ID: 98897
Summary: Erroneous procedure attribute for associate name
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98896
--- Comment #4 from Stas Sergeev ---
I can achieve similar results with this:
---
void cont(void) asm("_cont");
asm volatile (
"push %0\n"
"ret\n"
"_cont:\n"
::"r"(cont));
---
But this doesn't work if the opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98894
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
I already posted a fix on the gcc-patches and libstdc++ lists:
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/experimental/bits/simd.h: Remove unnecessary static
assertion. Allow sizeof(8) integer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98896
--- Comment #3 from Stas Sergeev ---
I can't use inline-asm gotos because
I can't manipulate such a label in a portable way.
For example:
---
asm volatile (
"push $1f\n"
"ret\n"
"1:\n"
);
---
This won't work with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #11 from Richard Smith
---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10)
> It looks like Clang has a bug with the inaccessible constructor too, and
> strangely inconsistent handling of the inaccessible destructor.
Access checks are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98870
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d761172d9b2feff68d50f38b3c76969532688791
commit r11-6990-gd761172d9b2feff68d50f38b3c76969532688791
Author: Michael Meissner
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98896
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
See PR 29305 and others too on why this is undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98896
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-01-19 00:00:00 |2021-1-29
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98896
Bug ID: 98896
Summary: local label displaced with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98861
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98861
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98871
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98871
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 50092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50092&action=edit
Patch for GCC 12.
The attached patch applied on top the one for pr98465
(https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98895
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||All
Host|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98895
Bug ID: 98895
Summary: C++ module generates too many dead code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0202fa3d6359911a9e6d605d33d0ac669e21eaf3
commit r11-6988-g0202fa3d6359911a9e6d605d33d0ac669e21eaf3
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #9)
> > I've committed the patch only to the trunk. I believe the bug on the trunk
> > is still present but not t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #9)
> I've committed the patch only to the trunk. I believe the bug on the trunk
> is still present but not triggered by the test.
See #c5, by using ? 2 : 1 inste
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've committed the patch only to the trunk. I believe the bug on the trunk is
still present but not triggered by the test.
I'll commit a bit modified patch to gcc 10 branch after some time if there is
no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f9f83ef300e8734dccb90a7c347997b2787e9e9
commit r11-6986-g7f9f83ef300e8734dccb90a7c347997b2787e9e9
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98881
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Reduced testcase:
export module Expr;
template class TBase {};
template typename TTpl>
class TBase>
{
public:
template typename UTpl>
void Foo (TBase> &rhs);
};
void Frob (TBase&);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
--- Comment #22 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Thank you, Jason and others, for your attentiveness to interest in the bug and
prioritizing its fix. (Now if you could just fix all the other bugs I'm
interested in... :-P)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98331
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98853
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] wrong use |[9 Regression] wrong use of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] aarch64:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98255
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] larger |[8/9 Regression] larger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98894
Bug ID: 98894
Summary: New test case experimental/simd/standard_abi_usable.cc
in r11-6935 fails on power 7
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98331
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea0e1eaa30f42e108f6c716745347cc1dcfdc475
commit r10-9324-gea0e1eaa30f42e108f6c716745347cc1dcfdc475
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf93f94b3498f3925895fb0bbfd4b64232b9987a
commit r10-9323-gcf93f94b3498f3925895fb0bbfd4b64232b9987a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98847
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf93f94b3498f3925895fb0bbfd4b64232b9987a
commit r10-9323-gcf93f94b3498f3925895fb0bbfd4b64232b9987a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98853
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a2c1e22c2501457608f12d5ab560caaca59c425
commit r10-9322-g2a2c1e22c2501457608f12d5ab560caaca59c425
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb09d7242a25971b275292332337a56b86637f2c
commit r10-9321-gfb09d7242a25971b275292332337a56b86637f2c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98771
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c20cd1688aed7014b52ed03cde143b6327a89e7a
commit r10-9320-gc20cd1688aed7014b52ed03cde143b6327a89e7a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97301
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db9a3ce7b83ce3ed3e0ffe7eb7a918595640e161
commit r10-9319-gdb9a3ce7b83ce3ed3e0ffe7eb7a918595640e161
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5750f847158e7f9bdab770fd9c5fff58c5074d3
commit r10-9318-ge5750f847158e7f9bdab770fd9c5fff58c5074d3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd92986ea6d2d363146e1726817a84910453fdc8
commit r10-9317-gdd92986ea6d2d363146e1726817a84910453fdc8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98255
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e28ebfa5a359942752ca9f5e774cadd1878005a
commit r10-9316-g8e28ebfa5a359942752ca9f5e774cadd1878005a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98672
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8182cbe3fb2c2d20e8dff9d2476fb94046e560b3
commit r10-9315-g8182cbe3fb2c2d20e8dff9d2476fb94046e560b3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98883
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 06:55:16PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> This bug report should be closed.
>
> Please read the description of option tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98883
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98893
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98893
Bug ID: 98893
Summary: start_cleanup_cnt needs modularizing
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115
--- Comment #10 from James Y Knight ---
Seeing as GCC is now in Stage 4 before the next release, I'd like to ping this
bug.
Should the priority be upgraded? I think fixing this so that GCC doesn't use
'v111__alignof__' should be considered a rel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82877
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91903
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Will Schmidt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91a95ad2ae0e0f2fa953fafe55ff2ec32c8277d5
commit r11-6984-g91a95ad2ae0e0f2fa953fafe55ff2ec32c8277d5
Author: Will Schmidt
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98843
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98843
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83bdc9f70347e6438822e719c30c3793c81df18e
commit r11-6983-g83bdc9f70347e6438822e719c30c3793c81df18e
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> Created attachment 49785 [details]
> Reduced test-case
>
> I reduced both the source file and the corresponding GCDA file.
How do you reduce a gcda file togethe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98880
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
My mistake. interface and implementation partitions do not follow the
non-partition behaviour. You have two M:A partitions (one an interface and one
an implementation). This is what you want:
A.cc:
expor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
The problem in attachment 50081 is different from the one reported in comment
#0. The warning there is issued for the call to operator delete in the IL
below as a result of the the test in bb 4 not being fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98866
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2dd1f944547eb6560c3e15a4b705ae1ac236df75
commit r11-6982-g2dd1f944547eb6560c3e15a4b705ae1ac236df75
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98892
Bug ID: 98892
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/diagnostic-test-expressions-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7f52181a6a16bb6d216ff41d9c6a9da95c19b5c
commit r11-6981-ga7f52181a6a16bb6d216ff41d9c6a9da95c19b5c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca02f0a0eb0fbeb3c1e01c3a55a95b0690ecfabc
commit r9-9212-gca02f0a0eb0fbeb3c1e01c3a55a95b0690ecfabc
Author: Jason Merrill
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
--- Comment #6 from Pilar Latiesa ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #5)
> your A-impl.cpp needs `import :B` and vice-versa
Yep. Thanks. But that's not enough for it to compile:
A-impl.cpp:7:17: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #21 from John David Anglin ---
Still present on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98463
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2127d2c3ee23bbd03f02d88fd82403408696ee4a
commit r10-9314-g2127d2c3ee23bbd03f02d88fd82403408696ee4a
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85908100051cb63b2fd2c039f3a166d45386b9d9
commit r10-9313-g85908100051cb63b2fd2c039f3a166d45386b9d9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98642
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:506fcfdb12562e829448e2b2eff475c65986e26b
commit r10-9312-g506fcfdb12562e829448e2b2eff475c65986e26b
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81fd2df5911c4b2c31960fa5ef1407d20f1ca50c
commit r10-9311-g81fd2df5911c4b2c31960fa5ef1407d20f1ca50c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
your A-impl.cpp needs `import :B` and vice-versa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #27)
> HJ, you added remove_partial_avx_dependency - it adds loads of DF problems
> but during its execution it does not seem to use anything but doing
> df_insn_rescan. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98891
Bug ID: 98891
Summary: [11 regression] Neon logical operations not vectorized
in DImode since
g:cdfc0e863a03698a80c74896cbdc9f5c8c652e64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #26 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> Created attachment 50087 [details]
> updated time and memory report
>
> This is updated -f{time,mem}-report (with
> --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats) for l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
--- Comment #4 from Pilar Latiesa ---
I tried:
$ cat M.cpp
export module M;
export import :A;
export import :B;
$ cat A.cpp
export module M:A;
export class B;
export
class A
{
void
f(B const &) const;
};
$ cat B.cpp
export module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98858
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98459
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98088
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Doesn't ICE if the conditions match the iteration direction, the way it is
written it will never iterate, and if it would iterate (say int i = 0; i > -3;
i++) it would be invalid OpenACC. Doesn't ICE for int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98088
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
module partitions are probably what you want for such mutually dependent types.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98447
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
This is still failing (trunk). The test on godbolt:
https://godbolt.org/z/Yx7b1d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
--- Comment #2 from Pilar Latiesa ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #1)
> This is ill-formed. an exported entity must be so-declared on its first
> declaration.
>
> A diagnostic is missing on the definition of the class.
I see. Than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98890
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems the ICE is quite long, seems before around (+- 25 revisions) r137400
gfortran ICEd in the FE:
internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:483
and after that it ICEs in gimple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50072|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
Just an update on what I know so far.
There seems to be no symmetry between the growth of the memory costs vs that of
the caller saved registers.
In the case of the memory costs, the actual memory cost in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98890
Bug ID: 98890
Summary: ICE on reference to module function
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50087
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50087&action=edit
updated time and memory report
This is updated -f{time,mem}-report (with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |accepts-invalid
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98881
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17314
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb52e59e33845152cef6f9042a142a246e9447f6
commit r11-6973-gcb52e59e33845152cef6f9042a142a246e9447f6
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Nick Krempel from comment #0)
> The following code should fail to compile but does not:
>
> struct V {};
> struct B : private virtual V {};
> struct D : B {};
>
> int main() {
> D d;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #22 from Martin Liška ---
There are other smaller spikes I can see:
663s: current pass = cse1 (259)
{'ltrans': {'memory': 1.5744667053222656, 'cpu': 6.24375}}
{'ltrans': {'memory': 1.5744667053222656, 'cpu': 6.24375}}
{'ltrans': {'me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|missed-optimization |memory-hog, ra
Summary|WRF w
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
