https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98243
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 50091
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50091&action=edit
gcc11-pr98243.patch
I'll test this. The test (intentionally) is not gcc.dg/vect/ and therefore
can't rely on default VECTFLAGS and so I think can't safely use vect_int
effective target either.
So, I'll just make sure it is vectorized on x86 and on aarch64 (the latter as
an example of a target that doesn't need any extra options to get the
vectorization).
