[Bug target/96932] [nvptx] atomic_exchange missing barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96932 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug analyzer/97029] New: [11 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97029 Bug ID: 97029 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1612 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/97028] Compilation errors for AVX512 intrinsic with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97028 --- Comment #1 from Nikita --- Here is the link demonstrating the issue on https://godbolt.org/z/bc6669

[Bug target/97028] New: Compilation errors for AVX512 intrinsic with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97028 Bug ID: 97028 Summary: Compilation errors for AVX512 intrinsic with -masm=intel Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/97025] In -m32 mode the alignment of pointers returned by malloc or operator new is less than alignof(std::max_align_t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97025 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- The change to max_align_t was done in r240248 in 2016, glibc's malloc was changed some time after.

[Bug target/97025] In -m32 mode the alignment of pointers returned by malloc or operator new is less than alignof(std::max_align_t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97025 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- operator new just gets its memory from malloc. GCC changed the alignment of max_align_t on x86 targets, but if you don't have a newer malloc then it won't know about that change and so disagrees with GCC's

[Bug target/97025] In -m32 mode the alignment of pointers returned by malloc or operator new is less than alignof(std::max_align_t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97025 --- Comment #2 from Mikhail Kremniov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > malloc is not controlled by gcc. Yeah, I shouldn't have mentioned malloc because there seems to be no requirement for it to align the returned addresses by al

[Bug middle-end/97027] New: missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027 Bug ID: 97027 Summary: missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar into a smaller array Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug debug/97026] New: -flto and DW_AT_GNU_macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97026 Bug ID: 97026 Summary: -flto and DW_AT_GNU_macros Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug Assi

[Bug target/97025] In -m32 mode the alignment of pointers returned by malloc or operator new is less than alignof(std::max_align_t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97025 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- malloc is not controlled by gcc.

[Bug c++/91741] Implement new warning -Wsizeof-array-div

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91741 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/97025] New: In -m32 mode the alignment of pointers returned by malloc or operator new is less than alignof(std::max_align_t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97025 Bug ID: 97025 Summary: In -m32 mode the alignment of pointers returned by malloc or operator new is less than alignof(std::max_align_t) Product: gcc Version: 10.2

[Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 --- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #18) > > Why aren't KFmode, IFmode and TFmode all 128??? Mike? > > This comes from rs6000-modes.h: > > /* We order the 3 128-bit floating point types so that

[Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 --- Comment #19 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #14) > > --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > > This may lead to a total mess, and I am unable to test it, but can you try:

[Bug tree-optimization/97009] [9/10/11 Regression] Inlining with non-standard selected_int_kind leads to errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97009 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P3 --- Comment #4 from anlauf

[Bug fortran/97024] Overriding finalization on polymorphic types triggers ICE error in generate_finalization_wrapper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97024 --- Comment #2 from John Haiducek --- For the sake of convenience (so there are links to click) the above-mentioned bugs were bug 92587 and bug 82996.

[Bug target/97018] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float_1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub[123]+ss 32 on Linux/x86_64 (-m64 -march=cascadelake)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97018 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Summary|[10/11 Regression]

[Bug fortran/97024] Overriding finalization on polymorphic types triggers ICE error in generate_finalization_wrapper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97024 --- Comment #1 from John Haiducek --- This bug shows some similarity to 92587 and 82996, but I suspect they are distinct. 92587 had a much more complicated MWE and the OP was unable to reduce it to a single file. 82996 did not involve class polym

[Bug fortran/97024] New: Overriding finalization on polymorphic types triggers ICE error in generate_finalization_wrapper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97024 Bug ID: 97024 Summary: Overriding finalization on polymorphic types triggers ICE error in generate_finalization_wrapper Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/97023] New: missing warning on buffer overflow in chained mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97023 Bug ID: 97023 Summary: missing warning on buffer overflow in chained mempcpy Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug middle-end/97023] missing warning on buffer overflow in chained mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97023 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug target/97018] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float_1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub[123]+ss 32 on Linux/x86_64 (-m64 -march=cascadelake)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97018 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/97022] New: -Werror flag aborts compilation of "current" git pull on main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97022 Bug ID: 97022 Summary: -Werror flag aborts compilation of "current" git pull on main Product: gcc Version: new-ra Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/97018] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float_1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub[123]+ss 32 on Linux/x86_64 (-m64 -march=cascadelake)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97018 --- Comment #5 from Sunil Pandey --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Do they PASS on the GCC 10 branch? GCC 10 branch has same issue. Same patch should be applied to GCC 10 too.

[Bug target/97018] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float_1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub[123]+ss 32 on Linux/x86_64 (-m64 -march=cascadelake)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97018 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/97018] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float_1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub[123]+ss 32 on Linux/x86_64 (-m64 -march=cascadelake)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97018 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40e99ed5f4e59c6d0a8e81cd6544c9b4e7ec2fe7 commit r11-3163-g40e99ed5f4e59c6d0a8e81cd6544c9b4e7ec2fe7 Author: Sunil K Pandey Date: Thu Sep

[Bug fortran/97021] New: [OpenMP] copy out of allocatable scalars does not work.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97021 Bug ID: 97021 Summary: [OpenMP] copy out of allocatable scalars does not work. Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp, wrong-code

[Bug target/97019] rs6000:redundant rldicr fed to lvx/stvx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97019 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Cool, if that helps, great!

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 96903, which changed state. Bug 96903 Summary: [11 regression] excess errors from gcc.dg/pr89350.c after r11-2973 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96903 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/96903] [11 regression] excess errors from gcc.dg/pr89350.c after r11-2973

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96903 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/96903] [11 regression] excess errors from gcc.dg/pr89350.c after r11-2973

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96903 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f36a8168f04dfbde9d4c64421c1058975b28ff9a commit r11-3162-gf36a8168f04dfbde9d4c64421c1058975b28ff9a Author: Martin Sebor Date: Fri

[Bug objc++/97015] [11 regression] ICE in set_decl_context_in_fn, at cp/name-lookup.c:2862 after r11-3100

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97015 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] [11 regression] new SVE failures after g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina --- I do think these are related to the bug I mentioned, I did isolate a small test function but I'll wait till trunk builds again to be able to test this patch :) otherwise the nightly CI will pick it up. Tha

[Bug c++/96959] GCC allows ill-formed explicit capture of requires-expression local parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96959 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/96960] ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:20531 from lambda in return-type-requirement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96960 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-11 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/96961] ICE default lambda as non-type template with default argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96961 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/91486] future::wait_for and shared_timed_mutex::wait_for do not work properly with float duration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91486 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9ddb696a289cc48d24d3d23c0b324cb88de9573 commit r11-3157-gf9ddb696a289cc48d24d3d23c0b324cb88de9573 Author: Mike Crowe Date: Fri

[Bug c++/96976] g++ reports "call of overloaded '...' is ambiguous" when universal reference is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96976 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/91241] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: symtab_node::verify failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91241 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn ---

[Bug c++/96975] gcc cannot compile at -O0 but compiles at -O1/-O2/-O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96975 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/96522] [9/10 Regression] Incorrect with with -O -fno-tree-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96522 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Hmm, picking the ref onto gcc-10 causes > > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr81410.c execution test > > due to an unaligned access. Looks like a latent issue. The follow

[Bug target/95421] [AArch64] Missing NEON functions documented on ARM's web site

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95421 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to SRINATH PARVATHANENI from comment #3) > I see following intrinsics for AArch64 already implemented. > vst3q_lane_p8 > vst3q_lane_s8 > vst3q_lane_u8 > Yes, they are missing in the arm p

[Bug target/95421] [AArch64] Missing NEON functions documented on ARM's web site

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95421 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sripar01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] [11 regression] new SVE failures after g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d3767c30240c901a493d82d9d20f306b2f0152d commit r11-3148-g8d3767c30240c901a493d82d9d20f306b2f0152d Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] [11 regression] new SVE failures after g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/96796] [9/10 Regression] aarch64: ICE during RTL pass: reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] aarch64:

[Bug objc++/97015] [11 regression] ICE in set_decl_context_in_fn, at cp/name-lookup.c:2862 after r11-3100

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97015 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] GCC |[8/9 Regression] GCC

[Bug tree-optimization/96522] [9/10 Regression] Incorrect with with -O -fno-tree-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96522 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, picking the ref onto gcc-10 causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr81410.c execution test due to an unaligned access.

[Bug tree-optimization/96579] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_nop() in gimple_assign_rhs1, at gimple.h:2605 since r7-950-g8a85cee26eabf5cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96579 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:228c6a864577098f1b3aeeb412c2eb5f05787f02 commit r10-8749-g228c6a864577098f1b3aeeb412c2eb5f05787f02 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/96514] [9/10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: control flow in the middle of basic block 3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96514 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a568a893f38a9cd32ddffd32bb9b6636deeeb5f1 commit r10-8747-ga568a893f38a9cd32ddffd32bb9b6636deeeb5f1 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/96349] [10 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption (Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 3 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.) [in fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96349 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1f9b13fd45f9c7ca6c5dd31245705388645f306 commit r10-8744-gd1f9b13fd45f9c7ca6c5dd31245705388645f306 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63a2bdbfb42628800a6999e98804928855592ce7 commit r10-8746-g63a2bdbfb42628800a6999e98804928855592ce7 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/96349] [10 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption (Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 3 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.) [in fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96349 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/96370] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with -ffast-math since r7-950-g8a85cee26eabf5cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96370 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:819fc71b49af8366e6b23d2b57ebb6fb66f1a292 commit r10-8748-g819fc71b49af8366e6b23d2b57ebb6fb66f1a292 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/96369] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong evaluation order of || operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96369 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3a0ef7a523fb4cdeabfbb9fab56bfcf8d21ffd5 commit r10-8745-gd3a0ef7a523fb4cdeabfbb9fab56bfcf8d21ffd5 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] [11 regression] new SVE failures after g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 49208 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49208&action=edit pach I am testing

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] [11 regression] new SVE failures after g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I guess I have a simple fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] [11 regression] new SVE failures after g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-11 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] [11 regression] new SVE failures after g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10.0|11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97020] New: [11 regression] new SVE failures after g47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97020 Bug ID: 97020 Summary: [11 regression] new SVE failures after g47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/71960] __glibcxx_assert and Debug Mode checks can't be used in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71960 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/96999] [8/9 Regression] std::variant requires default constructor with gcc 8-9, gcc 7.x and 10.x works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96999 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/88345] -Os overrides -falign-functions=N on the command line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345 Koen Zandberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||koen.zandberg at inria dot fr --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/71960] __glibcxx_assert and Debug Mode checks can't be used in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71960 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:877cdcc714704e242f477580d81397cc1d0fc90e commit r8-10444-g877cdcc714704e242f477580d81397cc1d0fc90e Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/96999] [8/9 Regression] std::variant requires default constructor with gcc 8-9, gcc 7.x and 10.x works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96999 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1521433e2b6bff583b227fe391fe9dcf02f6000e commit r8-10445-g1521433e2b6bff583b227fe391fe9dcf02f6000e Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/94033] [10 Regression] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1521433e2b6bff583b227fe391fe9dcf02f6000e commit r8-10445-g1521433e2b6bff583b227fe391fe9dcf02f6000e Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug tree-optimization/95049] [9 Regression] GCC never terminates with trivial input program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95049 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug ipa/94947] [8/9 Regression] -fipa-pta + pthread_once crash since r6-5684-g47e5754e17e9ac3b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94947 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7cfb86a2a18c9d54d1fd43f17affcd184477ecb3 commit r9-8866-g7cfb86a2a18c9d54d1fd43f17affcd184477ecb3 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/95717] [9 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed since r9-5325-gf25507d041de4df6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95717 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/94964] [8/9 Regression] ICE in add_phi_arg, at tree-phinodes.c:359 since r8-2993-ga7976089dba5e227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94964 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95a8572ce7bdf152cc8c7d069ce24508a9ff0bfe commit r9-8864-g95a8572ce7bdf152cc8c7d069ce24508a9ff0bfe Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug tree-optimization/95133] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5024ea60b74ac61c00b2aee40878761f7cf58973 commit r9-8862-g5024ea60b74ac61c00b2aee40878761f7cf58973 Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug ipa/94947] [8/9 Regression] -fipa-pta + pthread_once crash since r6-5684-g47e5754e17e9ac3b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94947 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0bcf016768f32799d4dabc82a29440b2ab1d717b commit r9-8865-g0bcf016768f32799d4dabc82a29440b2ab1d717b Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/95717] [9 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed since r9-5325-gf25507d041de4df6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95717 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1102a2c1fd221ee38f2f41aaf1094d4abbc3aedc commit r9-8861-g1102a2c1fd221ee38f2f41aaf1094d4abbc3aedc Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug tree-optimization/95049] [9 Regression] GCC never terminates with trivial input program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95049 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c7ae564f42b605e21001e5e6968a58cc454be9b commit r9-8863-g0c7ae564f42b605e21001e5e6968a58cc454be9b Author: Richard Biener D

[Bug target/97019] rs6000:redundant rldicr fed to lvx/stvx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97019 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/97019] New: rs6000:redundant rldicr fed to lvx/stvx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97019 Bug ID: 97019 Summary: rs6000:redundant rldicr fed to lvx/stvx Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug lto/95604] LTO doesn't pick up -fcf-protection flag for the link step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95604 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/96203] [11 Regression] LTO bootstrap with --enable-cet is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96203 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Matthias Klose : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80ff137368412a1628cd56b76a860a76a08fd8ea commit r10-8743-g80ff137368412a1628cd56b76a860a76a08fd8ea Author: Matthias Klose

[Bug lto/95604] LTO doesn't pick up -fcf-protection flag for the link step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95604 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Matthias Klose : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c7cf559e6a51ebb41631bfc8396d6ab9f992499 commit r10-8742-g5c7cf559e6a51ebb41631bfc8396d6ab9f992499 Author: Matthias Klose

[Bug target/96898] [nvptx] libatomic support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96898 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/96964] [nvptx] Implement __atomic_test_and_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96964 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/96999] [8/9 Regression] std::variant requires default constructor with gcc 8-9, gcc 7.x and 10.x works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96999 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d06c17e9f470f4a2d7e41ca6f3a8b36c729dc6a commit r9-8860-g6d06c17e9f470f4a2d7e41ca6f3a8b36c729dc6a Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/94033] [10 Regression] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d06c17e9f470f4a2d7e41ca6f3a8b36c729dc6a commit r9-8860-g6d06c17e9f470f4a2d7e41ca6f3a8b36c729dc6a Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug target/96898] [nvptx] libatomic support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96898 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15545563128f0240192c263522d4a36b7f86250f commit r11-3145-g15545563128f0240192c263522d4a36b7f86250f Author: Tom de Vries Date: Mon

[Bug target/96964] [nvptx] Implement __atomic_test_and_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96964 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15545563128f0240192c263522d4a36b7f86250f commit r11-3145-g15545563128f0240192c263522d4a36b7f86250f Author: Tom de Vries Date: Mon

[Bug tree-optimization/96043] BB vectorizer costing lumps everything together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043 --- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #6) > > Hi Richi, > > > > This change seems to have caused a few of our vectorization benchmarks to > > slow down in

[Bug tree-optimization/96043] BB vectorizer costing lumps everything together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #6) > Hi Richi, > > This change seems to have caused a few of our vectorization benchmarks to > slow down including x264 which slowed down about 7%. > > I can see

[Bug tree-optimization/96043] BB vectorizer costing lumps everything together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug debug/93865] .debug_line with LTO refers to bogus file-names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93865 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ceabd8fc7c299b3428f37e8c07b0c9662b119c75 commit r10-8736-gceabd8fc7c299b3428f37e8c07b0c9662b119c75 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug lto/94311] LTO produces line info entries with invalid line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94311 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:591a05e2027d202e2d28ef6fd5df63e7c7f9556d commit r10-8730-g591a05e2027d202e2d28ef6fd5df63e7c7f9556d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/96901] [11 Regression] Many libstdc++ tests FAIL on i686-linux due to a PCH FE bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96901 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dfe983656318c1aaa33c7f9a5a341c5904aa5b6 commit r10-8732-g3dfe983656318c1aaa33c7f9a5a341c5904aa5b6 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug debug/94235] worse debug info with O0 than with O2 with flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94235 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c448a5496842ecde55dce2fd390f6f12911a06c4 commit r10-8735-gc448a5496842ecde55dce2fd390f6f12911a06c4 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug debug/96729] [11 Regression] slow compile with `-g -O3` since r11-39-gf9e1ea10e657af9f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96729 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ede01bd9adf55f43598036d21d5db3d95dfd24a3 commit r10-8728-gede01bd9adf55f43598036d21d5db3d95dfd24a3 Author: Jakub Jelinek D

[Bug fortran/96859] Wrong answer with intrinsic merge_bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e24dbeeb7864dc4c673f57383c3fa329d1d16e71 commit r10-8729-ge24dbeeb7864dc4c673f57383c3fa329d1d16e71 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/96862] -frounding-math -std=c++2a error: '(1.29e+2 * 6.9314718055994529e-1)' is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96862 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38a13f9f70c2a60d831dd03a9bfc2e58bd80d888 commit r10-8731-g38a13f9f70c2a60d831dd03a9bfc2e58bd80d888 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/97018] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float_1.c scan-assembler-times vfnmsub[123]+ss 32 on Linux/x86_64 (-m64 -march=cascadelake)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97018 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug tree-optimization/97013] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c fails after r11-3095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97013 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/97013] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c fails after r11-3095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97013 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9c960a3bd621fc7a721e3c31c706ba736b384ea commit r11-3135-ga9c960a3bd621fc7a721e3c31c706ba736b384ea Author: Richard Biener Date: