[Bug fortran/96386] New: Internal compiler error in ASSOCIATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96386 Bug ID: 96386 Summary: Internal compiler error in ASSOCIATE Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug lto/96385] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto, wrong-debug CC|

[Bug middle-end/96384] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96384 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug debug/96383] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.5, 4.9.4 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug libstdc++/96382] [11 Regression] const_reverse_iterator() ctor is rejected in c++98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96382 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/96380] [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have view_convert_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/96375] [11 regression] arm/lob[2-5].c fail on some configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96375 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Version|10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/96376] [11 regression] vect/vect-alias-check.c and vect/vect-live-5.c fail on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96376 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10.0|11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/96370] ice with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96370 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Status|UN

[Bug c/96369] Wrong evaluation order of || operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96369 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0, 4.8.5, 7.5.0 Component|t

[Bug c++/96331] Class template argument deduction (CTAD) with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96331 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from TC ---

[Bug debug/96383] Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 --- Comment #3 from Ben Woodard --- This also affects C++ but in that case some info can be derived due to mangling.

[Bug c++/95486] ICE for alias CTAD with non-dependent argument and constrained constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71141b1bd537cc516e485c834c2d36abba3f4544 commit r11-2419-g71141b1bd537cc516e485c834c2d36abba3f4544 Author: Patrick Palka Date: We

[Bug c++/96106] [10/11 Regression] A friend abbreviated template function denies access to private members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96106 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f31dd9beb95f4beda1d2bd5c0526c42d0ce455c4 commit r11-2418-gf31dd9beb95f4beda1d2bd5c0526c42d0ce455c4 Author: Patrick Palka Date: We

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c58f5cadfac338a67723fd6e41c9097760c4a33 commit r11-2420-g2c58f5cadfac338a67723fd6e41c9097760c4a33 Author: Patrick Palka Date: W

[Bug c++/96164] Constraints and explicit template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96164 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc3d1e181445fafbbd146eb355a750c41c338794 commit r11-2417-gdc3d1e181445fafbbd146eb355a750c41c338794 Author: Patrick Palka Date: We

[Bug ipa/96352] inflated text section with ipa inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96352 --- Comment #2 from jojo --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > It was a bugfix. If you want to have small binaries use -Os. You can also > tune the inliner with various knobs, the most important maybe > --param inline-unit-growth w

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 pipcet at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pipcet at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug fortran/53957] Polyhedron 11 benchmark: MP_PROP_DESIGN twice as long as other compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957 --- Comment #25 from Anthony --- (In reply to Anthony from comment #24) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #23) > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, prop_design at protonmail dot com wrote: > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5

[Bug middle-end/96384] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96384 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- It looks like a false positive caused by the weirdo signed vs unsigned conversions between wide_int and offset_int. It happens in this piece of code in compute_objsize: offset_int orng[2]; tree o

[Bug middle-end/96384] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96384 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-29 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug lto/96385] New: GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 Bug ID: 96385 Summary: GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug middle-end/96384] New: [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96384 Bug ID: 96384 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/96383] Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 --- Comment #2 from Ben Woodard --- Created attachment 48955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48955&action=edit gcc binary

[Bug c/96383] Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 --- Comment #1 from Ben Woodard --- Created attachment 48954 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48954&action=edit clang binary

[Bug c/96383] New: Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 Bug ID: 96383 Summary: Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/89772] memchr for a character not in constant nul-padded string not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89772 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/96382] [11 Regression] const_reverse_iterator() ctor is rejected in c++98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96382 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/96382] New: const_reverse_iterator() ctor is rejected in c++98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96382 Bug ID: 96382 Summary: const_reverse_iterator() ctor is rejected in c++98 Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/91427] Implement P1825R0, Merged wording for P0527R1 and P1155R3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91427 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1722e2013f05f1f1f99379dbaa0c0df356da731f commit r11-2412-g1722e2013f05f1f1f99379dbaa0c0df356da731f Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tu

[Bug c++/91212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] const ignored for ctor arguments within return since r8-2493-g4ce8c5dea53d8073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81bc0ec3e926d7a2c90502847ddaacf3d56d5b75 commit r11-2411-g81bc0ec3e926d7a2c90502847ddaacf3d56d5b75 Author: Jason Merrill Date: We

[Bug target/96347] note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC UNSPEC_TP (19) found in variable location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96347 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48946|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- Hi Paul, Not sure how the UK is handling the pandemic. Here, in Washington we have 4 phases. Phase 1 has the most restrictions and phase 4 is the pandemic is over. Most of Washington made it into phase 2 (

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug target/96371] [nvptx] frounding-math support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96371 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The target hook float_exceptions_rounding_supported_p can be used to determine whether support for exceptions and rounding modes is available. For any architectures with hardware floating

[Bug target/96371] [nvptx] frounding-math support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96371 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Anyway, in absence of all this, without fenv.h support there's no way to set > the rounding mode, meaning that we can assume default ro

[Bug fortran/96381] New: gfc_find_vtab can use a character type typespec as a derived type (causing invalid access)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381 Bug ID: 96381 Summary: gfc_find_vtab can use a character type typespec as a derived type (causing invalid access) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #14 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Steve, Your opinion of git and the change over to it is much the same as mine. I have given it a go but had several "accidents" which put me off for a bit. As for working on the br

[Bug c++/96380] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have view_convert_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380 Bug ID: 96380 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have view_convert_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- For those that need a quick workaround for the kernel, I think (uint8x16_t) (k ^ vld1q_u8(const0)), (uint8x16_t) (k ^ vld1q_u8(const1)), instead of k ^ vld1q_u8(const0), k ^ vld1q_u8(const1), will do

[Bug c++/96310] Ignoring Wnonnull via pragma gcc diagnostics still produces a unwanted note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- I've been thinking about that too but not really coming up with anything given the current design. One idea is to change warning() to return a unique "token" and have inform() take it as an argument and do it

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- This dates back to https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00288.html Dunno, do we want to never strip attributes from VECTOR_TYPEs and only strip them that way from non-VECTOR_TYPEs? Or only st

[Bug c++/96379] New: [ 10/11 Regression ] GCC accepts totally invalid template declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96379 Bug ID: 96379 Summary: [ 10/11 Regression ] GCC accepts totally invalid template declaration Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-in

[Bug bootstrap/96378] New: ICE: Solaris/SPARCv9 bootstrap stage2 segfault compiling stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96378 Bug ID: 96378 Summary: ICE: Solaris/SPARCv9 bootstrap stage2 segfault compiling stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:54:59PM +, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #10) > > (In reply to jvdelisle from comment #9) > > > I regr

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the problem is that c_common_type does: 742 if (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t1) != NULL_TREE) 743 t1 = build_type_attribute_variant (t1, NULL_TREE); 744 745 if (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t2) != N

[Bug tree-optimization/96367] bogus -Wformat-truncation in ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96367 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/96368] False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96368 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Manue

[Bug middle-end/96300] missing -Wuninitialized reading a struct member by a conditionally assigned pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96300 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Last recon

[Bug target/96377] New: [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 Bug ID: 96377 Summary: [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/96368] False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96368 Salamandar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #2 from Salamandar --

[Bug c/96368] False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96368 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 96368, which changed state. Bug 96368 Summary: False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96368 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix at piedallu dot me --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/96376] New: [11 regression] vect/vect-alias-check.c and vect/vect-live-5.c fail on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96376 Bug ID: 96376 Summary: [11 regression] vect/vect-alias-check.c and vect/vect-live-5.c fail on armeb Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug analyzer/96374] Analyzer erroneously rejects certain diagnostics due to path-feasibility being used on shortest path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- This is likely to be associated with "merger" exploded_nodes (where we have merged state to help the exploded graph converge). Perhaps if we fail to find a feasible path on the first try we could retry, find

[Bug tree-optimization/96369] Wrong evaluation order of || operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96369 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/96375] New: [11 regression] arm/lob[2-5].c fail on some configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96375 Bug ID: 96375 Summary: [11 regression] arm/lob[2-5].c fail on some configurations Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug analyzer/96374] New: Analyzer erroneously rejects certain diagnostics due to path-feasibility being used on shortest path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374 Bug ID: 96374 Summary: Analyzer erroneously rejects certain diagnostics due to path-feasibility being used on shortest path Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/96373] New: SVE miscompilation on vectorized division loop, leading to FP exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96373 Bug ID: 96373 Summary: SVE miscompilation on vectorized division loop, leading to FP exception Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/96372] New: [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372 Bug ID: 96372 Summary: [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug preprocessor/95889] [10 regression] __has_include broken with -traditional-cpp (and therefore with Fortran)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95889 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 f

[Bug target/96371] New: [nvptx] frounding-math support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96371 Bug ID: 96371 Summary: [nvptx] frounding-math support Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/93295] ICE in alias_ctad_tweaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295 ofee oficsu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oficsu at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug fortran/45424] [F08] Add IS_CONTIGUOUS intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424 Bug 45424 depends on bug 53298, which changed state. Bug 53298 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 53298, which changed state. Bug 53298 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/96370] New: ice with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96370 Bug ID: 96370 Summary: ice with -ffast-math Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unas

[Bug fortran/96319] Don't warn for LOGICAL kind conversion with -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96319 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug fortran/96319] Don't warn for LOGICAL kind conversion with -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96319 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c4d2b867666464fad2dc5732940beaae48d8628 commit r10-8549-g3c4d2b867666464fad2dc5732940beaae48d8628 Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug c/96369] New: Wrong evaluation order of || operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96369 Bug ID: 96369 Summary: Wrong evaluation order of || operator Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug debug/93951] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE with '-flto -g -femit-struct-debug-baseonly'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93951 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/95096] Feature request: add -fsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95096 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/96366] [AArch64] ICE due to lack of support for VNx2SI sub instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96366 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/95096] Feature request: add -fsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95096 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8d3f2b6d1d81535ac3b71fd8dd1def12f8d03b3 commit r11-2407-gc8d3f2b6d1d81535ac3b71fd8dd1def12f8d03b3 Author: Fangrui Song Date: We

[Bug c++/59254] confusing diagnostic for undefined template shadowed by declaration in inline namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59254 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-03-23 00:00:00 |2020-7-29 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/92944] [concepts] redefinition error when using constrained structure template inside namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92944 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-29 Blocks|

[Bug c++/96363] bogus error with constrained partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96363 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-29 See Also|

[Bug debug/88878] .debug_pubnames/types empty with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88878 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > The .debug_types section isn't supposed to be output when in_lto_p > (that's for the LTRANS units where we generally do not output any > types into DWARF). Ins

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 > > --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- > But doing that would mean pretty much the

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||okannen at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug c++/96361] return type not deduced for a function template specialization given as argument of a template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96361 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug target/35488] A incorrect result in a simple division, only in 32-bit gcc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35488 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c/96368] New: False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96368 Bug ID: 96368 Summary: False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug preprocessor/95889] [10 regression] __has_include broken with -traditional-cpp (and therefore with Fortran)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95889 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org Las

[Bug debug/88878] .debug_pubnames/types empty with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88878 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #7) > Hello, @rguenth could you suggest what problem does -fdebug-types-section > -flto still have? > When I remove the use_debug_types's "&& !in_lto_p" part it looks

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- But doing that would mean pretty much the same amount of code at the expense of making the IL larger even when not needed (and perhaps risking some optimization opportunities). Yet another possibility would

[Bug c/96367] New: bogus format truncation error on armhf when building perf with gcc 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96367 Bug ID: 96367 Summary: bogus format truncation error on armhf when building perf with gcc 10 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/88878] .debug_pubnames/types empty with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88878 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com --- C

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 > > --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- > But we need to do the regimplification for

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- But we need to do the regimplification for several other reasons, so what would be the advantage of doing it that way?

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 > > --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- > We have indeed: > # DEBUG D#2 => MEM[(do

[Bug target/96366] New: [AArch64] ICE due to lack of support for VNx2SI sub instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96366 Bug ID: 96366 Summary: [AArch64] ICE due to lack of support for VNx2SI sub instruction Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96363] bogus error with constrained partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96363 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/96319] Don't warn for LOGICAL kind conversion with -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96319 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6af8284719d151087a1c1e4da210cc5a9fa4a478 commit r11-2403-g6af8284719d151087a1c1e4da210cc5a9fa4a478 Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- We have indeed: # DEBUG D#2 => MEM[(double *)&] and on the caller side: D.2566[_9] = foo<3, 3> (D.2559, D.2572); [return slot optimization] So, that is why to & &D.2566[_9] is propagated. Now, if I add t

  1   2   >