https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org>
---
Gah. Thanks for the report and analysis. Like you say,
I was hoping that adding the attributes in 10.2 but not
making them matter for type compatibility would have
been pretty conservative, but obviously it wasn't
conservative enough.
I'll take a look tomorrow.
