https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93673
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #9)
> > These look like duplicates: I tried to repeat this with current master by
> > adding -fanalyzer to gcc.dg/dg.exp's DEFAULT_CFLAGS, and I didn't see any
> > c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93673
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc6d0f89d4be3ed7fde73417606a78c73d954cdf
commit r10-6612-gdc6d0f89d4be3ed7fde73417606a78c73d954cdf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
I did it in a much simpler way:
cd /home/dcb/gcc/trunk.git/gcc/testsuite
for i in `find . -name \*.c -print | sort`
do
echo $i
/home/dcb/gcc/results.20200212/bin/gcc -c -O2 -fanalyzer -w $i
done
I'll report back with anything else I find.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> > I tried out -fanalyzer with all the C code under gcc/testsuite.
> >
> > There are 35368 C source code files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93725
Bug ID: 93725
Summary: [GCOV] inline attribute leads to incorrect code
coverage for calling variable argument function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #167 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #166)
> The problem is is the branch offset is too big. I believe GNU ld will
> create a PLTOFF
> entry in the PLT to handle this, but that's not happening with HP ld.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93724
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 47832
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47832&action=edit
Fixed patch
-mavx512vbmi2 -S
error
: In function '__m512i foo(__m512i, __m512i)':
:3:41: error: expected ')' before ';' token
3 | return _mm512_shrdi_epi16 (a, b, 10);
| ^
In file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93670
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6)
> I ran into some ICEs in Ada with '--with-build-config=bootstrap-analyzer'
> with comment #0, which I've filed as 93723.
PR 93723, I meant to say (so it linkifies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||93723
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
Bug ID: 93723
Summary: ICEs building ada with -fanalyzer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93722
Bug ID: 93722
Summary: rorq is not produced for rotate on some cases
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Note I will file f0 not producing rolq soon.
Filed as PR 93722.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
For unsigned long:
void f(unsigned long *a)
{
unsigned long t0 = a[0];
unsigned long t1 = a[1];
a[1] = t0;
a[0] = t1;
}
void f0(unsigned long *a)
{
__uint128_t t0 = ((__uint128_t *)a)[0];
__uint12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
A simple testcase:
void f(unsigned short *a)
{
unsigned short t0 = a[0];
unsigned short t1 = a[1];
a[1] = t0;
a[0] = t1;
}
CUT
Should produce the same as:
void f0(unsigned short *a)
{
uns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721
Bug ID: 93721
Summary: swapping adjacent scalars could be more efficient
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93720
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93720
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpochepk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93720
Bug ID: 93720
Summary: [10 Regression] vector creation from two parts of two
vectors produces TBL rather than ins
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 regression] |[9 regression]
|-Wsign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92583
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49171
--- Comment #26 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #23)
> What you want (and what everybody I've seen asking for similar things)
But comment #17 shows the different use of
reinterpret_cast - offsetof in templates.
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93719
Bug ID: 93719
Summary: Unable to find a register to spill
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92583
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2368db567a853b0765833b3bd4e7934f3c6be61
commit r10-6609-gc2368db567a853b0765833b3bd4e7934f3c6be61
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92654
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2368db567a853b0765833b3bd4e7934f3c6be61
commit r10-6609-gc2368db567a853b0765833b3bd4e7934f3c6be61
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #39 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 47830
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47830&action=edit
MIPS patch
This is the MIPS patch, I will post it by the end of next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #166 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-12 5:26 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
>
> --- Comment #165 from Peter Bisroev ---
> Hi Dave,
>
> (In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93718
Bug ID: 93718
Summary: Use a single translation message template for
structurally equal messages
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #165 from Peter Bisroev ---
Hi Dave,
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #162)
> On 2020-02-12 10:38 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> > The exact HP linker errors from linking cc1, cc1plus and lto1 were (I was
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #164 from Peter Bisroev ---
Created attachment 47829
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47829&action=edit
GCC 4.9.4 gimple-expr.c dump (aCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #163 from Peter Bisroev ---
Created attachment 47828
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47828&action=edit
GCC 4.9.4 gimple-expr.c dump (gcc)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That above commit is just a spec special, it doesn't solve anything else,
imnsho.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is not the same cost. It reduces the path length.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93712
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Specifically caused by this hunk:
@@ -1066,7 +1069,7 @@ build_array_conv (tree type, tree ctor, int flags,
tsubst_flags_t complain)
c->rank = rank;
c->user_conv_p = user;
c->bad_p = bad;
- c->u.nex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85723
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93717
Bug ID: 93717
Summary: [10 Regression] gcc.dg/optimize-bswapsi-2.c fails
after it was updated in r10-5832
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93658
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> On the #c7 testcase, this started with
> r8-6072-ga3a821c903c9fa2288712d31da2038d0297babcb (so I wonder why this
> isn't a 8/9/10 Regression).
I'm not sure Kelvi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88999
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02ce382cd323097f9d02fbf91e0a3f59ebcd3d30
commit r10-6603-g02ce382cd323097f9d02fbf91e0a3f59ebcd3d30
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02ce382cd323097f9d02fbf91e0a3f59ebcd3d30
commit r10-6603-g02ce382cd323097f9d02fbf91e0a3f59ebcd3d30
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93663
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93663
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f3932a0ec875cb7cca187018f3f8f05f2519d3e
commit r10-6602-g3f3932a0ec875cb7cca187018f3f8f05f2519d3e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93694
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
> (Obsolete, ld_classic only) -sectcreate segname sectname file
segname, sectname and file should be marked as .
> -segprot max_prot init_prot\tThe protection values are
This like only describes the syntax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93646
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88781
Bug 88781 depends on bug 93646, which changed state.
Bug 93646 Summary: confusing -Wstringop-truncation on strncat where
-Wstringop-overflow is expected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93646
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93646
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a0de9636d29a378961e4c98a129421229918052
commit r10-6600-g0a0de9636d29a378961e4c98a129421229918052
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93694
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
double space:
> dyld will
missing word:
> two-level information
should probably be "two-level namespace information"
> Provided
> (Obsolete after 10.3.9) Set
Shouldn't there be a tab between the words in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93607
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36725
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Henlich ---
Created attachment 47827
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47827&action=edit
Proposed patch to perform runtime check in fmt_g0_4.f08
This checks ensure that G0.d output is not broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93716
Bug ID: 93716
Summary: [feature request] Improve error message for Classes
without a default constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93713
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r10-3735-gcb57504a550158913258e5be8ddb991376475efb
commit cb57504a550158913258e5be8ddb991376475efb
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed Oct 9 13:20:32 2019 -0400
Update the concepts implement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93714
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93713
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93712
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery, |ice-on-valid-code
|ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93715
Bug ID: 93715
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in
gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at
fortran/trans-array.c:6320
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93714
Bug ID: 93714
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_same_strlen, at
fortran/check.c:1253
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93713
Bug ID: 93713
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in equivalently_constrained, at
cp/constraint.cc:2949
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93712
Bug ID: 93712
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in convert_like_real, at
cp/call.c:7466
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
--- Comment #1 from Evan Teran ---
As a follow-up, it appears that the optimization level is a factor. I only get
the ICE in my builds which don't pass a -O flag.
Here's a live example that can be experimented with:
https://godbolt.org/z/zAEcQd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93658
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93191
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Thanks Will. I think I'll email CWG and ask about it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bfc8303ffe2d86e938d45f13cd99a39469dac4f
commit r10-6598-g5bfc8303ffe2d86e938d45f13cd99a39469dac4f
Author: Wilco Dijkstra
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
Bug ID: 93711
Summary: ICE: [[no_unique_address] when constructing via
template helper
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93191
--- Comment #2 from Will Wray ---
Actually, the issue now appears to be not with variadic args directly but with
deduction (variadic Args are necessarily deduced, whether via template Arg or
auto placeholder).
So, for single arg, this works with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85957
--- Comment #27 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #25)
> I think standards-conforming excess precision should be forced on, and added
> to C++; there are just too many dangerous ways things can break as it is
> now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85957
--- Comment #26 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Adding the support for C++ would also be a matter for people who care
about this platform that few people do now care about.
I suspect that if you force the back-end insn pattern effects o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Bug 90374 depends on bug 36725, which changed state.
Bug 36725 Summary: g0 edit descriptor: Missing compile-time checking for
invalid g0.d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36725
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36725
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47826
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47826&action=edit
gcc10-pr93582.patch
Untested patch for the first step, going to test this now on both little and
big endian.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86650
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80329
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
For the whole testcase with the patch we generate:
93710-2.C:6:3: error: conversion from ‘long int’ to ‘A’ is ambiguous
6 | 0L,
| ^~
93710-2.C:1:21: note: candidate: ‘A::A(char*)’
1 | struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
With
--- a/gcc/cp/call.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.c
@@ -4172,8 +4172,9 @@ build_user_type_conversion_1 (tree totype, tree expr, int
flags,
if (complain & tf_error)
{
auto_diagnostic_group d;
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
template
void foo(const T t = "; ")
{
}
int main()
{
foo ();
}
$ ./cc1plus -quiet 92010.C
92010.C: In function ‘int main()’:
92010.C:8:8: internal compiler error: in tsubst_default_argument, at
cp/pt.c:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #162 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-12 10:38 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> The exact HP linker errors from linking cc1, cc1plus and lto1 were (I was
> compiling in parallel):
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93710
Bug ID: 93710
Summary: poor location in diagnostics of messages about array
initializers
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93709
Bug ID: 93709
Summary: [10 regression] fortran.dg/minlocval_4.f90 fails on
power 9 after r10-4160
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93708
Bug ID: 93708
Summary: missing warning on memset overflow with transposed
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88819
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88819
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54947e4db0a98a9190bab263e6ae539065ac52c5
commit r10-6595-g54947e4db0a98a9190bab263e6ae539065ac52c5
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
--- Comment #2 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For a self-recursive function, a for-all-contexts clone could generate an edge
whose callee is not the function. Thus, to check whether an edge stands for a
recursive call during cloning, we should n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
--- Comment #1 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 47825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47825&action=edit
A simplified case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
fxue at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88819
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93697
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
Bug ID: 93707
Summary: ICE in perlbench from SPEC2017
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93684
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93684
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e428a9cf85a8bdde9d031a215e10bd96eb3b789a
commit r10-6594-ge428a9cf85a8bdde9d031a215e10bd96eb3b789a
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #161 from Peter Bisroev ---
Hi Dave,
I have added attachment 47824 (sancov.dump.tar.xz) containing .o, .s and RTL
dumps as you have requested. It is for the compilation of gcc/sancov.c in gcc
8.3.0 using 4.7.4 as a host compiler. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #160 from Peter Bisroev ---
Created attachment 47824
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47824&action=edit
.o, .s and RTL dumps
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
