https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #7 from Fangrui Song ---
> Is -fasynchronous-unwind-tables compatible with -fpatchable-function-entry?
Apparently the Linux kernel does not care about it. To make it usable in
userspace, we should place .cfi_startproc in a reasonable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47759|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47758|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 47758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47758&action=edit
A patch
If it looks OK, I will add a couple testcases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92634
--- Comment #13 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, I came to the conclusion myself that this is really nothing to do with
dereferencing. So my original claim and Andrew's replies about dereferencing
are not relevant. The standard says of unary &
"The op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Thanks Thomas, I will have a look. It really helps to have a second pair of
eyes on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at lekensteyn dot nl
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532
--- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti ---
Sorry for the noise. This is true when compiling c files too. :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532
--- Comment #1 from Giulio Benetti ---
And the same behaviour is observed building lmbench too.
Here is the log:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d47/d47e46889d7bcc5864c738cb948afc168327b612/build-end.log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532
Bug ID: 93532
Summary: RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 86216, which changed state.
Bug 86216 Summary: g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00a49cd840f60774b0e9e0109fb10559bc9a9194
commit r10-6389-g00a49cd840f60774b0e9e0109fb10559bc9a9194
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
--- Comment #83 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Benson ---
Note that this patch doesn't check that the duplicate attributes are valid or
consistent with those declared in the module. For example both:
module mm
implicit none
interface
module function c()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113
Andrew Benson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abensonca at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91922
--- Comment #2 from slightbody at ledroadwaylighting dot com ---
I'm not a regular gcc contributor, but I am a user of the compiler. Just
wondering if this issue will ever be addressed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #82 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e98ebda074bf8fc5f630a93085af81f52437d851
commit r10-6388-ge98ebda074bf8fc5f630a93085af81f52437d851
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #81 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2b9548f38c77edc29ab0e24e516f1fb341ecea7
commit r10-6387-gd2b9548f38c77edc29ab0e24e516f1fb341ecea7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 91320 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
> b) that alignas is incorrectly placed
Bug 90847
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93373
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93457
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93457
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6775172431a8e6f0d20ac0c4946d6b5db2f46450
commit r10-6386-g6775172431a8e6f0d20ac0c4946d6b5db2f46450
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93373
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09bea5845a50189b093e7fa8d5b840da702197d4
commit r10-6385-g09bea5845a50189b093e7fa8d5b840da702197d4
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93168
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg02096.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93055
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Vlad, any thoughts on this?
A pseudo in the loop happens to be spilled. So the pseudo is changed onto
its equivalence which is an invariant to the loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93519
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93531
Bug ID: 93531
Summary: missing -Wrestrict calling strcat with strcpy as
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92305
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I believe this is a FE bug, for these functions TYPE_ARG_TYPES of the
FUNCTION_TYPE show just 6 arguments and don't include those 4 extra boolean
args for the scalar optional dummy vars, and as the function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've committed a patch solving PR91333. The patch also solves the current PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=2a07345c4f8dabc286fc470e76c53473e5bc3eb7
So I guess we can close the current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a07345c4f8dabc286fc470e76c53473e5bc3eb7
commit r10-6384-g2a07345c4f8dabc286fc470e76c53473e5bc3eb7
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
r10-4969-g1723e1bedb9545c45619c4023729755243524584
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
Bug ID: 93530
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE on invalid alignas
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93379
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365
--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 03:46:04PM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365
>
> markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>>> Since I'm no longer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93438
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93379
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1c807e887d43551bca0acc16a438d880cfaf7c9
commit r10-6383-gf1c807e887d43551bca0acc16a438d880cfaf7c9
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93438
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:455f58ec50465aed9d92dc31d68708a05e499388
commit r10-6382-g455f58ec50465aed9d92dc31d68708a05e499388
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 47756
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47756&action=edit
initial WIP
This implements the simplest form, but not the string literal case or
parenthesized init.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
Bug ID: 93529
Summary: Implement P1009R2, Array size deduction in
new-expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93528
Bug ID: 93528
Summary: Object copy not optimized out for most sizes in strict
aliasing memcpy pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The patch unfortunately regressed:
+FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/loop-5.c (internal compiler error)
+FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/loop-5.c (test for excess errors)
which looks like previously broken code on the testcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5910b14503dd82772dfeca5336a0176f9b1d260a
commit r10-6381-g5910b14503dd82772dfeca5336a0176f9b1d260a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92305
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, to sum up, in #c9 we are (or want to do) in Fortran roughly what in C we
would do with:
void foo (double aa, double bb, void *c_aptr, void *c_bptr, double **aptr,
double **bptr, _Bool _aa, _Bool _bb, _Bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93496
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
On the gcc-8 branch it was fixed by r261091 for PR 85873
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93509
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91320
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Sounds good Vlad. Real curious to see what, if any, heuristics work in
practice. We can obviously reevaluate this BZ once you've wrapped up on 91333.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93527
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93440
--- Comment #6 from ikonomisma at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> OK, so I can compile the testcase now but I fail to see the error. We're
> doing pointer difference compares and those should work out fine?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93527
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
zcat namidevel.pp.cc.gz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93527
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93527
--- Comment #1 from Paco Arjonilla ---
Created attachment 47755
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47755&action=edit
Preprocessed source code
File is gzipped because its original size is 1055841 bytes.
(fc4ea7a)
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ gcc10git --version
gcc10git (GCC) 10.0.1 20200131 (experimental)
configuration options:
$ ../gcc/configure --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c++
--program-suffix=10git
Build command:
$ make -j 12
maybe related to bug 79917
Compiler command
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92634
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93496
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A brief, but maybe too brief look at the other bug.
If it's the same issue, I don't understand how it was fixed in GCC 8.2 when
r267702 wasn't committed until after the 8.2 release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93526
--- Comment #3 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
Let me quote documentation then:
"Require a constant operand and print the constant expression with no
punctuation."
There's nothing said about valid value ranges or alike. To me as a user of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93384
--- Comment #29 from Victor Stinner ---
Jakub Jelinek: "Fixed on the trunk."
Oh wow, that was quick! Thanks for the fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93055
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Vlad, any thoughts on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93526
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93365
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93526
--- Comment #1 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
Bug 85344 may be related for the signedness aspect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92388
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 92388 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93526
Bug ID: 93526
Summary: x86-64: %c cannot be used in asm for "i" constraint
operand and arbitrary constant value
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91465
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> This is the fix, thought I recall it broke something.
That was constexpr-ex4.C:
constexpr-ex4.C:13:11: error: no matching function for call to ‘A::operator
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92169
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r0-116587-g0fd0752e83525409addcdb904c67dc535bd5c1d1:
commit 0fd0752e83525409addcdb904c67dc535bd5c1d1
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu May 3 12:19:02 2012 -0400
dwarf2out.c (modified_type_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
--- Comment #101 from Dzianis Kahanovich ---
Created attachment 47754
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47754&action=edit
additional aligning on demand 10.0 (unsure)
This is same for gcc 10.0 and not fully verifyed.
It MUST w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
--- Comment #100 from Dzianis Kahanovich ---
Created attachment 47753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47753&action=edit
additional aligning on demand <10.0
Finally (for me), if somebody think to patch by H.J. Lu is not enou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93462
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a97d9eae4543a995f895e6739530f55f5d039a7
commit r10-6372-g6a97d9eae4543a995f895e6739530f55f5d039a7
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
This only work because the directory does not change from build time to train
time. The paths are not relative instead absolute path is put into every .o
file at compile time.
jan@skylake:~> gcc -fprofile-gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] wrong |[8/9 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93525
Bug ID: 93525
Summary: Left shift and arithmetic shift could be futher
simplified in simplify-rtx.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: mis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92169
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e60b1e23626701939e8a2f0cf6fc1e48abdf867b
commit r10-6371-ge60b1e23626701939e8a2f0cf6fc1e48abdf867b
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93510
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> do you have example how the relative paths can be used?
We use them in GCC boostrap for instance ;) We copy .gcda files with:
{ find . -name '*.*da' | sed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91838
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93510
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If I get this right,
extern void abort (void);
extern int random ();
int
main ()
{
int a[1024];
for (int x = 0; x < 1024; x++)
a[x] = 1 + (random () & 1);
int d, h;
for (int x = 0; x < 1024; x +=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93496
--- Comment #5 from Justin LaPolla ---
I think this may be a duplicate of PR 86669. Thanks for finding it.
> Fixed on trunk by r266893 for PR 86669, which doesn't seem related.
What makes you say it doesn't seem related?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249
--- Comment #28 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #27)
> We've hit what seems like almost the exact same issue on gcc 8.3.0 with this
> minimized testcase:
>
> void fg(int *);
> int get_response(int a)
> {
> int b;
> i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
do you have example how the relative paths can be used?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #28 from Martin Liška ---
Stats one more time (should not wrap around):
== Stats for /tmp/prev-gcc ==
stats for indirect_call:
Total: 9218, total freq: 5945116271, covered freq: 3610877419 (60.74%)
Histogram:
0 tracked: 6257 (6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #27 from Martin Liška ---
I've just made an experiment with the dynamic allocation of TOPN profile counts
(similarly to what clang does).
There's a GCC branch that does instrumentation and profiling (including
merging):
https://gcc.gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> Actually passing phony / is not needed. We could do right thing with
>
> gcc foo.c -o /ibb1/foo.o -fprofile-prefix-map==
> -fprofile-generate
>
> or
>
> gcc foo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> Just to summarize discussions we had. I think we need to think through
> setup where there are different build, train and pgo-buid machines and the
> directories ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93401
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Actually passing phony / is not needed. We could do right thing with
gcc foo.c -o /ibb1/foo.o -fprofile-prefix-map==
-fprofile-generate
or
gcc foo.c -o /ibb1/foo.o -fprofile-strip-prefix=
-fprofile-generate
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
