[Bug middle-end/91603] New: Unaligned access in expand_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91603 Bug ID: 91603 Summary: Unaligned access in expand_assignment Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug target/91602] GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Waterman --- Yeah, this is a bit a rat hole. Of course there's nothing about RISC-V that precludes the use of the leb128 data formats. We fib that they aren't supported to prevent the DWARF emitters from subtracting l

Re: [Bug bootstrap/91602] GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support

Yeah, this is a bit a rat hole. Of course there's nothing about RISC-V that precludes the use of the leb128 data formats. We fib that they aren't supported to prevent the DWARF emitters from subtracting label addresses at assembly time. RISC-V linker relaxations foil the assumption that those di

[Bug bootstrap/91602] GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems like uleb128 is not supported at all in riscv. This should be fixed on the gas side. No other target has issues with uleb128.

[Bug bootstrap/91602] New: GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602 Bug ID: 91602 Summary: GCC fails to build for riscv in a combined tree due to misconfigured leb128 support Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Key

[Bug gcov-profile/91601] [GCOV]gcov: internal compiler error: in handle_cycle, at gcov.c:699 happen which get code coverage with lcov.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91601 --- Comment #2 from ammy.yi --- gcc version 9.1.1 20190503 gcc-9-branch@270849 has not this issue, but latest gcc version 9.2.1 20190816 gcc-9-branch@274554 has this issue

[Bug gcov-profile/91601] [GCOV]gcov: internal compiler error: in handle_cycle, at gcov.c:699 happen which get code coverage with lcov.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91601 --- Comment #1 from ammy.yi --- gcc version 9.2.1 20190816 gcc-9-branch@274554 (Clear Linux OS for Intel Architecture)

[Bug gcov-profile/91601] New: [GCOV]gcov: internal compiler error: in handle_cycle, at gcov.c:699 happen which get code coverage with lcov.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91601 Bug ID: 91601 Summary: [GCOV]gcov: internal compiler error: in handle_cycle, at gcov.c:699 happen which get code coverage with lcov. Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1

[Bug d/91600] New: "Architecture not supported" reported for MinGW-W64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91600 Bug ID: 91600 Summary: "Architecture not supported" reported for MinGW-W64 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/91457] FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- The Glibc warning is being discussed on libc-alpha: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-08/msg00774.html

[Bug middle-end/91599] GCC does not say where warning is happening

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91599 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug middle-end/91599] GCC does not say where warning is happening

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91599 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|unknown

[Bug middle-end/91599] GCC does not say where warning is happening

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91599 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/91584] [9 Regression] Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Summary|Bogus warning fro

[Bug middle-end/91584] Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/91599] New: GCC does not say where warning is happening

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91599 Bug ID: 91599 Summary: GCC does not say where warning is happening Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #14) > The current solution is a bit annoying for implicitly-derived interfaces. > > Consider a code like: > > module foo > implicit none > type t1 > integer :: i

[Bug c++/91592] `__is_assignable` fails for private assignment operators in certain contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91592 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 --- Comment #11 from Matt Wala --- Thanks for fixing this!

[Bug testsuite/27221] g++.dg/ext/alignof2.C fails on powerpc-darwin (and powerpc-aix)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27221 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- fixed for 8.4

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe --- fixed for 8.4

[Bug bootstrap/87030] GCC fails to build with Xcode 10, attempting an impossible multilib build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.4 |7.5 --- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe ---

[Bug testsuite/27221] g++.dg/ext/alignof2.C fails on powerpc-darwin (and powerpc-aix)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27221 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Thu Aug 29 19:36:50 2019 New Revision: 275054 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275054&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Backport fix for PR27221. 2019-08-29 Iain Sandoe

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 07:18:01PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 > > --- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Steve Karg

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Thu Aug 29 19:32:25 2019 New Revision: 275053 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275053&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin, testsuite] Backport fix for PR67958. 2019-08-29 Iain Sandoe

[Bug bootstrap/87030] GCC fails to build with Xcode 10, attempting an impossible multilib build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030 --- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Thu Aug 29 19:26:45 2019 New Revision: 275052 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275052&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Darwin] Fix PR87030 and tidy config fragments. This is about 32/64b host

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #15) > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:49:15PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > module foo > > implicit none > > type t1 > > integer :: i = 1 >

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:49:15PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > module foo > implicit none > type t1 > integer :: i = 1 > end type t1 > type t2 > integer :: j = 2 > end type t2

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/81914] [7 Regression] gcc 7.1 generates branch for code which was branchless in earlier gcc version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81914 Jonny Grant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jg at jguk dot org --- Comment #15 from Jo

[Bug tree-optimization/90134] ICE in duplicate_eh_regions_1, at except.c:557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90134 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|9.0 |10.0, 9.2.0 --- Comment #2 from Arseny

[Bug c++/91129] [9/10 Regression] Implicit casts fail for modulo operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91129 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91598] [8/9/10 regression] 60% speed drop on neon intrinsic loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91598 --- Comment #2 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- Created attachment 46784 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46784&action=edit Patch for 70% of the regression

[Bug target/91598] [8/9/10 regression] 60% speed drop on neon intrinsic loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91598 --- Comment #1 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- Created attachment 46783 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46783&action=edit Testcase Testcase reported on https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-toolchain/2019-August/006983.html

[Bug target/91598] New: [8/9/10 regression] 60% speed drop on neon intrinsic loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91598 Bug ID: 91598 Summary: [8/9/10 regression] 60% speed drop on neon intrinsic loop Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/91150] [10 Regression] wrong code with -O -mavx512vbmi due to wrong writemask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91150 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 15:05:47 2019 New Revision: 275046 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275046&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-07-30 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/78884] [7/8] ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 15:05:01 2019 New Revision: 275045 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275045&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-07-04 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/90756] [7/8 Regression] g++ ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:218 on i686 and s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90756 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 15:04:19 2019 New Revision: 275044 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275044&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-07-04 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug sanitizer/90954] ICE: combining undefined behavior sanitizer with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90954 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 15:03:31 2019 New Revision: 275043 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275043&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-06-25 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/90950] OpenMP clause handling rejecting references to incomplete types in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90950 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 15:02:44 2019 New Revision: 275042 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275042&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-06-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/90760] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on attributes section and alias in set_section, at symtab.c:1573

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90760 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 15:01:54 2019 New Revision: 275041 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275041&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-06-12 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/90733] [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90733 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 15:01:10 2019 New Revision: 275040 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275040&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-06-05 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libgomp/90585] libgomp hsa plugin ftbfs in the x32 multilib variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90585 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 15:00:20 2019 New Revision: 275039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275039&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-05-24 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/90197] [8 Regression] Cannot step through simple loop at -O -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90197 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 14:59:48 2019 New Revision: 275038 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275038&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-05-15 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug pch/90326] Using any precompiled header breaks definition of FLT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90326 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 14:59:18 2019 New Revision: 275037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275037&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-05-10 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/90197] [8 Regression] Cannot step through simple loop at -O -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90197 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 14:57:56 2019 New Revision: 275036 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275036&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-26 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/90139] [7/8 Regression] ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90139 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 14:57:18 2019 New Revision: 275035 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275035&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-19 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/83661] sincos does not handle sin(2x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83661 Christophe Monat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christophe.monat at st dot com --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/91067] [9/10 Regression] Clang compiler can't link executable if std::filesystem::directory_iterator is encountered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91067 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/91067] [9/10 Regression] Clang compiler can't link executable if std::filesystem::directory_iterator is encountered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91067 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Aug 29 13:22:13 2019 New Revision: 275033 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275033&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/91067 add more missing exports for directory iterators

[Bug c++/91235] Array size expression is implicitly casted to unsigned long type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91235 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/83256] inconsistent _Pragma behavior in multi-line macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83256 Mark Rohrbacher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@r-dev.de --- Comment #4 from Mark

[Bug tree-optimization/91597] [9/10 Regression] GCC miscompiles a branch depending on a pointer tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91597 --- Comment #3 from Wojciech Nawrocki --- Workaround: -fdisable-tree-ifcombine turns off the broken optimization pass

[Bug c++/91235] Array size expression is implicitly casted to unsigned long type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91235 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski --- I checked that trunk gcc also accepts this code, both with -std=c++11 and -std=c++1z. Clang also compiles this without error. Could someone take a look on this and add some comment here?

[Bug libstdc++/91067] [9/10 Regression] Clang compiler can't link executable if std::filesystem::directory_iterator is encountered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91067 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Aug 29 12:16:27 2019 New Revision: 275032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275032&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/91067 add more missing exports for directory iterators

[Bug libgomp/90641] libgomp.c-c++-common/lastprivate-conditional-1.c etc FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90641 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/91597] [9/10 Regression] GCC miscompiles a branch depending on a pointer tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91597 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- As mentioned by Richi, else if (code == BIT_AND_EXPR) { /* For pointer types, we are really only interested in asserting whether the expression evaluates to non-NULL. */

[Bug tree-optimization/91597] [9/10 Regression] GCC miscompiles a branch depending on a pointer tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91597 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91597] New: [9/10 Regression] GCC miscompiles a branch depending on a pointer tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91597 Bug ID: 91597 Summary: [9/10 Regression] GCC miscompiles a branch depending on a pointer tag Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/91576] [10 Regression] error: invalid conversion in gimple call since r272749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 46781 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46781&action=edit Test-case #2 Since the same revision I see similar error: $ g++ -flto -O2 *.ii 1.ii:14:3: warning: type ‘struc

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 29 10:30:48 2019 New Revision: 275030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275030&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-29 Richard Biener PR bootstrap/91580 * con

[Bug testsuite/91549] [10 regression] gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c fails starting with r274925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91549 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/91596] IPA cdtor merging should preserve link file ordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91596 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > Previously we have decided this to be invalid. I think it is a mistake to > > consider us to do this really. >

[Bug tree-optimization/91351] [9 Regression] -fstrict-enums generates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[9/10 Regression

[Bug target/91560] Try harder for AVX non-AVX2 cross-lane permutations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91560 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/91596] IPA cdtor merging should preserve link file ordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91596 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Previously we have decided this to be invalid. I think it is a mistake to > consider us to do this really. True, but when it's easy then from a QOI perspective

[Bug testsuite/91549] [10 regression] gcc.dg/wrapped-binop-simplify.c fails starting with r274925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91549 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- > So fixed? It is from all I can see in both my tests and gcc-testresults. Thanks.

[Bug c++/91585] segfault when calling a non void function without a return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91585 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- >Effectively, if it is the expected behaviour, it's not a bug. Yes because this behavior is only undefined at runtime. So no diagnostic of the issue is required as it is only undefined if invoked.

[Bug ipa/91596] IPA cdtor merging should preserve link file ordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91596 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Previously we have decided this to be invalid. I think it is a mistake to consider us to do this really.

[Bug target/91560] Try harder for AVX non-AVX2 cross-lane permutations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91560 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 09:22:57 2019 New Revision: 275027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275027&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/91560 * config/i386/i386-expand.c (expand_vec_pe

[Bug tree-optimization/91351] [9/10 Regression] -fstrict-enums generates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Aug 29 09:20:54 2019 New Revision: 275026 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275026&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/91351 * tree-cfg.c (generate_range_t

[Bug c++/91585] segfault when calling a non void function without a return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91585 --- Comment #2 from lucien.gentis at waika9 dot com --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > You can use -Werror if you want errors. Not a bug. Effectively, if it is the expected behaviour, it's not a bug. About -Werror, I think it tur

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 46780 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46780&action=edit patch Patch that passed initial testing.

[Bug lto/91572] [9/10 Regression] lto1: error: type variant has different ‘TREE_TYPE’ since r269862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ipa/91596] IPA cdtor merging should preserve link file ordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91596 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto CC|

[Bug ipa/91596] New: IPA cdtor merging should preserve link file ordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91596 Bug ID: 91596 Summary: IPA cdtor merging should preserve link file ordering Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/91579] tailr1 pass creates redundant phi nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91579 --- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor --- I proposed a patch on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01949.html

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > Created attachment 46778 [details] > untested patch > > Added missing df_insn_rescan, also if there is more than one reaching def for > the use we cannot simply

[Bug tree-optimization/91457] FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/91577] [10 Regression] ICE in expand_load_lanes_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:163 since r274922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91577 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > So it looks like load/store-lanes has actual (aggregate) memory references > > as > > arguments: > > >

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #46777|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 29 08:12:57 2019 New Revision: 275024 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275024&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-29 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/91568

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 29 08:07:35 2019 New Revision: 275023 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275023&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-29 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/91568

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 46777 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46777&action=edit untested patch I am testing the attached.

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- OK, so /* Generate copies for out-of-chain uses of defs. */ for (df_ref ref = DF_INSN_DEFS (insn); ref; ref = DF_REF_NEXT_LOC (ref)) if (bitmap_bit_p (defs_conv, DF_REF_REGNO (ref))) {

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- core2, -mno-sse4, -msse, -msse2, -msse3, -mstv seem enough to trigger it on i686-darwin (just looking at the defaults from a -fverbose-asm output)

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > I can't reproduce that with current master (r275022) on: > > Linux i586 5.1.5-1-pae #1 SMP Mon May 27 07:14:33 UTC 2

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > I can't reproduce that with current master (r275022) on: > Linux i586 5.1.5-1-pae #1 SMP Mon May 27 07:14:33 UTC 2019 (6ad4f79) i686 > athlon i386 GNU/Linux Try to

[Bug tree-optimization/91594] Missing horizontal addition auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91594 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91591] Arc: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:60

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91591 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/91580] [10 Regression] i686-{darwin, linux} bootstrap fails after r274926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- I can't reproduce that with current master (r275022) on: Linux i586 5.1.5-1-pae #1 SMP Mon May 27 07:14:33 UTC 2019 (6ad4f79) i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux

[Bug fortran/91589] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2447

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91589 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/91586] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_derived_vtab, at fortran/class.c:2245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91586 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.3

[Bug middle-end/91584] Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91579] tailr1 pass creates redundant phi nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91579 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|