https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91580
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, so there's for example
Converting chain #349...
-deferring rescan insn with uid = 1100.
-deferring rescan insn with uid = 1101.
- Copied r401 to a vector register r525 for insn 244
-deferring rescan insn with uid = 1102.
+deferring rescan insn with uid = 1784.
+deferring rescan insn with uid = 1785.
+ Copied r401 to a vector register r525 for insn 503
+deferring rescan insn with uid = 1786.
+deferring rescan insn with uid = 1787.
+ Copied r524 to a scalar register r135 for insn 6
+deferring rescan insn with uid = 1788.
deferring rescan insn with uid = 6.
-deferring rescan insn with uid = 1103.
-deferring rescan insn with uid = 1104.
- Copied r524 to a scalar register r135 for insn 245
-deferring rescan insn with uid = 245.
+deferring rescan insn with uid = 1789.
+deferring rescan insn with uid = 1790.
+ Copied r524 to a scalar register r135 for insn 504
+deferring rescan insn with uid = 504.
Created a new instruction chain #350
see how we have a second def for r524.
