[Bug tree-optimization/90970] A suspicious code in builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90970 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/89863] [meta-bug] Issues that static analyzers (cppcheck, clang-static-analyzer) find that gcc misses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 Bug 89863 depends on bug 90970, which changed state. Bug 90970 Summary: A suspicious code in builtins.c https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90970 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/90970] A suspicious code in builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90970 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Aug 28 06:39:47 2019 New Revision: 274983 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274983&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Remove code leftover that has never been used. 2019-08-28 Martin Liska

[Bug tree-optimization/91571] TBAA does not work for ao_ref created by ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91571 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91566] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_constructor_copy, at fortran/constructor.c:103

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91566 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/91564] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14147

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91564 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.4

[Bug fortran/91565] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6707 etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91565 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.4

[Bug c++/91563] [9 regression] wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91563 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994 Bug 16994 depends on bug 91002, which changed state. Bug 91002 Summary: ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:271 with VLA type in reinterpret_cast https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91002 What|Removed

[Bug c++/88256] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in make_ssa_name_fn) with VLA cast, C++ FE missing DECL_EXPRs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ignat.loskutov at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/91002] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:271 with VLA type in reinterpret_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91002 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/91515] missed optimization: no tailcall for types of class MEMORY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91515 Peter Cordes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/91571] New: TBAA does not work for ao_ref created by ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91571 Bug ID: 91571 Summary: TBAA does not work for ao_ref created by ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size() Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c/91206] -Wformat doesn't warn for %hd with char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91206 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5) > (In reply to Nick Desaulniers from comment #4) > > Thanks for the feedback, in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL369791, Nathan made > > [unsigned] char -> [unsigned]sho

[Bug c/91206] -Wformat doesn't warn for %hd with char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91206 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Nick Desaulniers from comment #4) > Thanks for the feedback, in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL369791, Nathan made > [unsigned] char -> [unsigned]short warn only for -Wformat-pedantic, not > -Wformat

[Bug c++/81676] Wrong warning with unused-but-set-parameter within 'if constexpr'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81676 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89180] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180 Bug 89180 depends on bug 81676, which changed state. Bug 81676 Summary: Wrong warning with unused-but-set-parameter within 'if constexpr' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81676 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/81676] Wrong warning with unused-but-set-parameter within 'if constexpr'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81676 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 28 02:22:29 2019 New Revision: 274982 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274982&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81676 - bogus -Wunused warnings in constexpr if.

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 91428, which changed state. Bug 91428 Summary: Please warn on if constexpr (std::is_constant_evaluated()) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91428 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/91428] Please warn on if constexpr (std::is_constant_evaluated())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91428 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91428] Please warn on if constexpr (std::is_constant_evaluated())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91428 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 28 02:03:48 2019 New Revision: 274981 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274981&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/91428 - warn about std::is_constant_evaluated in if cons

[Bug fortran/91564] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14147

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91564 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/85741] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wformat-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741 Bug 85741 depends on bug 91567, which changed state. Bug 91567 Summary: [10 Regression] Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building glibc (32-bit only) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91567 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/91567] [10 Regression] Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building glibc (32-bit only)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91567 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/91567] [10 Regression] Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building glibc (32-bit only)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91567 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Aug 27 23:31:44 2019 New Revision: 274976 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274976&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/91567 - Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building

[Bug tree-optimization/83543] strlen of a local array member not optimized on some targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Aug 27 23:31:44 2019 New Revision: 274976 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274976&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/91567 - Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building

[Bug c++/91262] using template type parameter after typename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91262 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91570] [10 Regression] ICE in get_range_strlen_dynamic on a conditional of two strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91570 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug tree-optimization/91570] New: [10 Regression] ICE in get_range_strlen_dynamic on a conditional of two strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91570 Bug ID: 91570 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in get_range_strlen_dynamic on a conditional of two strings Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c++/91563] [9 regression] wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91563 --- Comment #5 from Guillaume Morin --- Jakub mentioned that r273135 fixed the abort() in the trunk. I noticed that this revision had already been backported to the gcc-9 branch as r274532. So I built the gcc-9 branch and I can confirm that it do

[Bug target/88082] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88082 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #13) > But that still doesn't make the types the same, and the use of the variable > in 2.ii has undefined behavior because it is accessing the value of the > object t

[Bug target/88617] ICE in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at config/i386/i386.c:11238 since r248029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88617 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > @Daniel: Can you please take a look? My apologies for missing this one! I'll take a look.

[Bug fortran/91565] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6707 etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91565 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > (In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #0) > > ICE hits gfortran-8 and higher - this changed just before 20180525. > > Starting with correct code z0.f90, then p

[Bug c++/91563] [9 regression] wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91563 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/91565] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6707 etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91565 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug rtl-optimization/91569] New: Optimisation test case and unnecessary XOR-OR pair instead of MOV.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91569 Bug ID: 91569 Summary: Optimisation test case and unnecessary XOR-OR pair instead of MOV. Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91496] !GCC$ directives error if mistyped or unknown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91496 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Tue Aug 27 19:16:33 2019 New Revision: 274966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274966&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-27 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/91496

[Bug tree-optimization/91567] [10 Regression] Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building glibc (32-bit only)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91567 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #46765|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/91506] Incorrectly issued error: parameter may not have variably modified type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91506 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Ah, I was reading the passage a bit wrong: where the extern "C" matters is not on the type, but on the variable (ml_bssnrest_). Because it's extern "C", declarations in different translation units correspon

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 --- Comment #1 from Matt Wala --- Created attachment 46768 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46768&action=edit Full compiler output

[Bug tree-optimization/91568] New: internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91568 Bug ID: 91568 Summary: internal compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:3922 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/91567] New: [10 Regression] Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building glibc (32-bit only)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91567 Bug ID: 91567 Summary: [10 Regression] Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building glibc (32-bit only) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/91566] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_constructor_copy, at fortran/constructor.c:103

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91566 Bug ID: 91566 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_constructor_copy, at fortran/constructor.c:103 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/91565] New: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6707 etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91565 Bug ID: 91565 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6707 etc. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/91528] [10 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue at i386.c:7844 since r274481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91528 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91528] [10 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue at i386.c:7844 since r274481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91528 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Aug 27 17:23:59 2019 New Revision: 274962 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274962&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/91528 * config/i386/i386-features.c (co

[Bug fortran/91564] New: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14147

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91564 Bug ID: 91564 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14147 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/91563] [9 regression] wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91563 --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Morin --- Jonathan, Are you sure? I modified the code to print std::is_trivially_copyable::value and it does print "1". Am I missing something obvious?

[Bug c++/91563] [9 regression] wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91563 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Just a note from bisection, stopped aborting on trunk with r273135, and started to abort in r260318.

[Bug c++/91563] [9 regression] wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91563 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The program's behaviour is undefined, because memset can't be used for writing to non-trivially copyable types.

[Bug testsuite/91562] [10 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-8.c fails starting with r274933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91562 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83431] -Wformat-truncation may incorrectly report truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83431 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Aug 27 16:18:27 2019 New Revision: 274961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274961&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/83431 PR testsuite/91562

[Bug testsuite/91562] [10 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-8.c fails starting with r274933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91562 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Aug 27 16:18:27 2019 New Revision: 274961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274961&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/83431 PR testsuite/91562

[Bug fortran/91556] Problems with better interface checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91556 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/91563] New: [9 regression] wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91563 Bug ID: 91563 Summary: [9 regression] wrong code Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/91506] Incorrectly issued error: parameter may not have variably modified type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91506 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/91558] [C++11] should not be constexpr until C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91558 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Yichen Yan from comment #3) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > > (In reply to Yichen Yan from comment #0) > > > Detail: > > > Constexpr for is in C++14 if I don't misunderstand

[Bug testsuite/91562] New: [10 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-8.c fails starting with r274933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91562 Bug ID: 91562 Summary: [10 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-8.c fails starting with r274933 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- > Created attachment 46765 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46765&action=edit > clear TYPE_NAME in free_lang_data for anonymous types > > Perhaps like this? It seems that this will disa

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 46765 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46765&action=edit clear TYPE_NAME in free_lang_data for anonymous types Perhaps like this?

[Bug target/88082] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88082 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Status|UNCONF

[Bug d/91561] New: [Regression] Internal Compiler Error: type ‘ubyte[]’ can not be mapped to C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91561 Bug ID: 91561 Summary: [Regression] Internal Compiler Error: type ‘ubyte[]’ can not be mapped to C++ Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug target/88082] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88082 Ilya Leoshkevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com --- Comment

[Bug lto/87500] ICE in discriminator_for_local_entity, at cp/mangle.c:1967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87500 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/88140] [9/10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed since r266325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88140 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka --- > @Honza: Can we close this? Array simplification is still disabled - we need to figure how how to represent them...

[Bug c++/69571] [C++11] invalid alignas on a typedef accepted, reduces alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69571 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/87501] lto1: error: Alias and target's section differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87501 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/69572] [C++11] invalid alignas accepted in many contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69572 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/88081] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto/lto-symtab.c:109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88081 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- @Honza: Reminder.

[Bug target/88083] ICE in find_constant_pool_ref_1, at config/s390/s390.c:8231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88083 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- @Ilya: Can we close this?

[Bug lto/88140] [9/10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed since r266325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88140 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- @Honza: Can we close this?

[Bug target/88615] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88615 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/88617] ICE in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at config/i386/i386.c:11238 since r248029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88617 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/88652] sel-sched.c:1545:11: runtime error: index 2 out of bounds for type 'long unsigned int [2]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88652 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > > Looks like you're right :) I'll fix that, then. > Any update on this, please?

[Bug tree-optimization/90213] UBSAN: signed integer overflow: -5621332293356458048 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90213 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, I think I eventually wanted to backport it...

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- > > > > They aren't in the anonymous namespace, but they are themselves anonymous, > > so they have no linkage. The standard says, > > > > A type without linkage shall not be used as the type of a variable

[Bug libstdc++/91558] [C++11] should not be constexpr until C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91558 --- Comment #3 from Yichen Yan --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to Yichen Yan from comment #0) > > Detail: > > Constexpr for is in C++14 if I don't misunderstand. But a lot of > > testcases under libstdc++-v3/testsu

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- @David: May I please remind this?

[Bug target/89623] Can't build mips-wrs-vxworks cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89623 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90213] UBSAN: signed integer overflow: -5621332293356458048 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90213 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- @Richi: Can we close this?

[Bug c++/90613] [10 Regression] Debug info size increase after r271467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90613 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- @Nathan: May I please remind this?

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8) > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2) > > 2.ii:62:3: warning: ‘ml_bssnrest_’ violates the C++ One Definition Rule > > [-Wodr] > >62 | } ml_bssnrest_; > >

[Bug libstdc++/91558] [C++11] should not be constexpr until C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91558 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Jonathan W

[Bug tree-optimization/90970] A suspicious code in builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90970 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/91558] [C++11] should not be constexpr until C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91558 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91560] Try harder for AVX non-AVX2 cross-lane permutations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91560 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug target/91560] New: Try harder for AVX non-AVX2 cross-lane permutations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91560 Bug ID: 91560 Summary: Try harder for AVX non-AVX2 cross-lane permutations Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c/91554] if (!__builtin_constant_p (fn_arg)) warning_function() works in inline when fn_arg is int, not when it is void *

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91554 --- Comment #4 from Zack Weinberg --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > I guess you want to use > > __builtin_constant_p (b != 0) > > instead. That wouldn't do what I want. The goal is to warn for any argument _other than_ a comp

[Bug libquadmath/91559] New: math/x2y2m1q.c assumes FE_TONEAREST defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91559 Bug ID: 91559 Summary: math/x2y2m1q.c assumes FE_TONEAREST defined Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lib

[Bug lto/91478] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 -g1 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/91478] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 -g1 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478 --- Comment #28 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Aug 27 13:36:15 2019 New Revision: 274955 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274955&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Share a prevailing name for remove debug info symbols w/ LTO. 2019-08-27

[Bug c/91554] if (!__builtin_constant_p (fn_arg)) warning_function() works in inline when fn_arg is int, not when it is void *

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91554 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- It's obviously 8462 /* If this expression has side effects, show we don't know it to be a 8463 constant. Likewise if it's a pointer or aggregate type since in 8464 those case we only want liter

[Bug c/91554] if (!__builtin_constant_p (x)) warning_function() works in inline when x is int, not when x is void *

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91554 --- Comment #2 from Zack Weinberg --- Additional fun detail: ``` static inline int thefun (void *a, void *b) { if (!__builtin_constant_p((__UINTPTR_TYPE__)b) || b != 0) thefun_called_with_nonnull_arg(); return real_thefun(a, b); } `

[Bug ipa/91468] Suspicious codes in ipa-prop.c and ipa-cp.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91468 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a patch on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01820.html

[Bug c++/91415] Invalid warning for C++17 sequencing of shift operator E1<

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Partially fixed, needs more work, so keeping this open.

[Bug libstdc++/91558] New: [C++11] should not be constexpr until C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91558 Bug ID: 91558 Summary: [C++11] should not be constexpr until C++14 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: li

  1   2   >