https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91002

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
             Blocks|                            |16994
         Depends on|16994                       |
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Does this really require every single other bug with C++ VLAs to be fixed first
before it can be closed? I think rather that the "Depends on" and "Blocks"
fields are switched; so I'm correcting them now.

(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > One of the many duplicates with VLAs
> > missing DECL_EXPRs.
> 
> Namely, PR88256.

Closing as a dup of it then.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 88256 ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
[Bug 16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++

Reply via email to