https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90756
--- Comment #19 from Mike Hommey ---
Applying the patch from PR90139 and this one works fixes the ICEs on this file
with both GCC 7 and 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91103
Bug ID: 91103
Summary: AVX512 vector element extract uses more than 1 shuffle
instruction; VALIGND can grab any element
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90756
--- Comment #18 from Mike Hommey ---
And similar ICE as comment 14 with 8.3 too.
9.1 works with the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40073
--- Comment #16 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Going from gcc 8.2 to gcc 9.1, I find the following two test cases are now
autovectorized:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
/* Test auto-vectorization */
#include "vector-types.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85746
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
The patch breaks 3 tests on a bootstrapped compiler:
c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-2.c
c-c++-common/ubsan/ptr-overflow-sanitization-1.c
gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-30.c
The last one in particular shows that the compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91102
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Before combine there were also
(insn 8 7 9 3 (set (reg/v:DI 95 [ c ])
(reg:DI 92 [ b$h ])) "91102.c":18:15 47 {*movdi_aarch64}
(nil))
(insn 11 10 12 3 (set (reg:DI 100)
(subreg:DI (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91102
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
91102.c: In function 'foo':
91102.c:7:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
7 | }
| ^
so ice-on-invalid-code?
Although, hrm, inserting "return 3;" there still I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91101
--- Comment #3 from Frantisek Sumsal ---
ltrace stastistics:
# WITH sanitizers and detect_stack_use_after_return=1
[vagrant@arch build]$ export
ASAN_OPTIONS=strict_string_checks=1:detect_stack_use_after_return=1:check_initialization_order=1:str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91101
--- Comment #2 from Frantisek Sumsal ---
Created attachment 46569
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46569&action=edit
test-conf-parser.i tempfile from GCC 9.1.0 (compressed due to size)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91101
--- Comment #1 from Frantisek Sumsal ---
Created attachment 46568
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46568&action=edit
hwdb.i tempfile from GCC 9.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-linux
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91102
Bug ID: 91102
Summary: [9/10 Regression] aarch64 ICE on Linux kernel with -Os
starting with r270266
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91101
Bug ID: 91101
Summary: Possible performance regression in libasan with
detect_stack_use_after_return=1
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91096
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91100
Bug ID: 91100
Summary: [9,10 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/socket1.adb execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89072
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91099
Bug ID: 91099
Summary: constexpr vs -frounding-math
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91090
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56248
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67017
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #25 from Segher Boessenkool ---
At expand time, the assignment is
;; c_ = c;
(insn 35 34 36 (set (reg/f:DI 140)
(unspec:DI [
(symbol_ref:DI ("*.LANCHOR1") [flags 0x182])
(reg:DI 2 2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91098
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #24 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is that disallowed? Is there any way to prevent that from happening, in
general?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #56 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-05 7:57 p.m., elowe at elowe dot com wrote:
> Doing some more testing on my "gprel unfixed fix" 32-bit gcc, I found out that
> it seems to be missing the 32-bit pointer swizzling need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On July 6, 2019 12:18:47 AM GMT+02:00, "pthaugen at linux dot ibm.com"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
>
>Pat Haugen changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85746
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 46566
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46566&action=edit
untested patch to fold _bcp only when necessary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90581
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91096
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jul 6 07:50:44 2019
New Revision: 273156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273156&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91096
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-10.c (F
32 matches
Mail list logo
