https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> Did this fix it?
No, I had to XFAIL the test for EAB32, and this PR was to keep track of that.
At this stage I'm not sure whether anyone's ever li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression]
|-Wimpl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallage
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72783
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79346
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> Confirmed, although it's pretty easy to work around, just write:
>
> #if defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901L
> #endif
>
> instead.
Ah, upon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91026
Bug ID: 91026
Summary: switch expansion produces a jump table with trivial
entries
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55442
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 27 21:29:19 2019
New Revision: 272765
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272765&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/55442 - memory-hog with highly recursive constexpr.
This t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91024
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 27 21:25:56 2019
New Revision: 272764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/91024
* gimplify.c (collect_fallthrough_labels): Ig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91010
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 27 21:23:09 2019
New Revision: 272763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91010
* tree-vect-stmts.c (scan_opera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70462
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91025
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #0)
> I'm happy in principle to produce a patch... but haven't quite got my head
> around how the man pages are generated (from the texinfo?).
Yes, via .pod files. Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91011
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.2
Summary|-Wimplicit-fallth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91024
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 46530
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46530&action=edit
gcc10-pr91024.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90987
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90987
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jun 27 17:52:00 2019
New Revision: 272756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-27 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/90987
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
--language=c++ seems to be required for C++ code.
--force helps cppcheck to avoid a too-early finish.
I use the current development cppcheck code, although it's fair to say that
new features rarely work 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91025
Bug ID: 91025
Summary: cpp man page incorrectly describes -MD option
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86564
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91024
Bug ID: 91024
Summary: -Wimplicit-fallthrough is confused by likely/unlikely
attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91023
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Höger ---
Since it might help investigating the issue, here is a workaround:
#include
#include
template
struct Foo
{
};
template
std::optional>
parse_variant(const Foo &... variants)
{
return {};
}
struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91023
Bug ID: 91023
Summary: Unification Fails for parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91020
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91022
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> Wit GCC 9 and trunk we are left with
>
>[local count: 118111600]:
> MEM[(int *)&D.30957] = 85899345930;
> D.30957[2] = 30;
> _33 = operator new (12);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91021
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
And beware of duplicate elements seen during the walk
typedef int v2si __attribute__((vector_size(__SIZEOF_INT__ * 2)));
int __attribute__((pure,noipa)) baz (int *a) { volatile int i = *a; }
int main()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
So like this where we should return 2 directly
typedef int v2si __attribute__((vector_size(__SIZEOF_INT__ * 2)));
int foo (int *a)
{
a[0] = 1;
a[1] = 2;
v2si x = *(v2si *)a;
*(v2si *)&a[2] = x;
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85494
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Michel Morin from comment #15)
> I just felt that waiting for GCC-10 (i.e. about a year) is a bit too long.
That's how new features work. If you want to use them, you need the new
version. Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85494
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 27 11:31:02 2019
New Revision: 272748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85494 use rand_s in std::random_device
This is a minimal f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90939
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90939
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Jun 27 11:26:52 2019
New Revision: 272747
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272747&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 90939] Remove outdated assert in ipcp_bits_lattice::meet_with
2019-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91016
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91022
Bug ID: 91022
Summary: A suspicious code in fortran/decl.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 91016, which changed state.
Bug 91016 Summary: A suspicious code in config/i386/i386-expand.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91016
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 90976, which changed state.
Bug 90976 Summary: A suspicious code in lra.c since r177852
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90976
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 91017, which changed state.
Bug 91017 Summary: A suspicious code in gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91017
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91017
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90976
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 90975, which changed state.
Bug 90975 Summary: A suspicious code in optabs.c since r177852
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90975
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90975
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 90974, which changed state.
Bug 90974 Summary: A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c since r256576
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90974
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90974
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90975
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jun 27 11:22:36 2019
New Revision: 272746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix various issues seen with clang-static-analyzer.
2019-06-27 Martin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91016
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jun 27 11:22:36 2019
New Revision: 272746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix various issues seen with clang-static-analyzer.
2019-06-27 Martin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90974
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jun 27 11:22:36 2019
New Revision: 272746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix various issues seen with clang-static-analyzer.
2019-06-27 Martin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90976
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jun 27 11:22:36 2019
New Revision: 272746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix various issues seen with clang-static-analyzer.
2019-06-27 Martin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91017
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jun 27 11:22:36 2019
New Revision: 272746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix various issues seen with clang-static-analyzer.
2019-06-27 Martin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90991
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 27 11:13:10 2019
New Revision: 272745
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272745&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/90991
* config/i386/sse.md (avx_vec_concat): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91021
Bug ID: 91021
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91020
Bug ID: 91020
Summary: Enhance SRA to deal with "omp simd array" variables
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2014-05-28 00:00:00 |2019-6-27
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[meta-bug] Issues that |[meta-bug] Issues that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91019
Bug ID: 91019
Summary: Missed optimization on sequential memcpy calls
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91016
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > ix86_expand_sse_compare_mask generates temporary by itself, so the REG RTX
> > is just overwritten. There is no issue w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91017
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91016
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88079
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark.eggleston at codethink
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91018
Bug ID: 91018
Summary: std::??clusive_scan vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91006
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> Hi,
> concerning ivopts-3.C it seems to work fine for me on a cross. I get
>
> Selected IV set for loop 9 at c.C:64, 3 avg niters, 1 IVs
>
> which test seem to loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91006
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 46527
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46527&action=edit
ivopts-3.C.164t.ivopts
This only happens for -std=c++98 and -m64:
$ grep "Selected IV set for loop" ivopts-3.C.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91012
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 27 10:06:09 2019
New Revision: 272741
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272741&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/91012 fixfilesystem_error::what() string
When I refactored
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91012
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91016
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
ix86_expand_sse_compare_mask generates temporary by itself, so the REG RTX is
just overwritten. There is no issue with reusage of pseudos as they are short
lived, and die in AND RTX anyway. OTOH, non-AVX AND RT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91002
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89772
--- Comment #3 from junma at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: junma
Date: Thu Jun 27 09:50:35 2019
New Revision: 272740
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272740&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89772
* gimple-fold.c (gimp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91012
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 27 09:42:39 2019
New Revision: 272739
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272739&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/91012 fixfilesystem_error::what() string
When I refactored
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91017
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2019-6-27
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91017
Bug ID: 91017
Summary: A suspicious code in gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91016
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Jakub's comment from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01659.html:
Just quick look suggests perhaps it wants to use one temporary
for the gen_reg_rtx (mode) and use that on the lhs of SET, and ano
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91016
Bug ID: 91016
Summary: A suspicious code in config/i386/i386-expand.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91004
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 27 09:08:02 2019
New Revision: 272737
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272737&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-27 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/91004
* g++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91006
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
concerning ivopts-3.C it seems to work fine for me on a cross. I get
Selected IV set for loop 9 at c.C:64, 3 avg niters, 1 IVs
which test seem to look for
// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Selected IV set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91004
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Before the rev. DOM2 removes the call to __warn_memset_zero_len while with
the change the condition guarding the call changes like this:
[local count: 1073741824]:
_4 = MEM[(unsigned int *)this_2(D)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91006
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Warray-bounds-4.C is about missed warning on array bounds. It also goes back
with -fno-ipa-sra
b.C: In function ‘int main()’:
b.C:25:27: warning: array subscript 0 is above array bounds of ‘char [0]’
[-Warray-b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91006
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Martin,
I also guess an interesting question is why extra MEM_REF prevents
ipa-sra from considering the function argument dead?
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91003
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So on the SLP branch I want to have SLP nodes for the constant / invariant
operands in the end where we can store/communicate a vector type.
This is somewhat far off (and the issue is latent anyways).
At l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91006
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91015
Bug ID: 91015
Summary: Which is correct working on polymorphic assignment...
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91010
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91003
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
On the RHS we have
unit-size
align:32 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x76a4c540 precision:32 min max
>
V4SI
size constant 128>
unit-size const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90960
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91013
Bug ID: 91013
Summary: member function can have same name as constructor if
declared using a typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82347
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||link-failure, wrong-code
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90974
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90975
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90976
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91011
--- Comment #6 from Adam Badura ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> IMHO -x c++ should be sufficient to cause cc1plus to be used.
I fully agree! However, it would mean the parameter would have to change its
meaning (be extended)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91011
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91012
Bug ID: 91012
Summary: filesystem_error no longer includes error_code message
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
