[Bug tree-optimization/89749] Very odd vector constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89749 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|UNC

[Bug target/89750] Wrong code for _mm_comi_round_ss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89750 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- ix86_expand_sse_comi_round has /* See avxintrin.h for values. */ enum rtx_code comi_comparisons[32] = { UNEQ, GT, GE, UNORDERED, LTGT, UNLE, UNLT, ORDERED, UNEQ, UNLT, UNLE, LT, LTGT, GE, GT,

[Bug target/89750] New: Wrong code for _mm_comi_round_ss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89750 Bug ID: 89750 Summary: Wrong code for _mm_comi_round_ss Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target A

[Bug tree-optimization/89749] New: Very odd vector constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89749 Bug ID: 89749 Summary: Very odd vector constructor Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/89748] missing _FORTIFY_SOURCE protection due to stpcpy folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89748 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Isn't the bug is that glibc does not include a fortified version of stpcpy?

[Bug tree-optimization/89748] New: missing _FORTIFY_SOURCE protection due to stpcpy folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89748 Bug ID: 89748 Summary: missing _FORTIFY_SOURCE protection due to stpcpy folding Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/41958] [c++0x] bogus variadic partial ordering code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41958 stinkingmadgod at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stinkingmadgod at gmail

[Bug target/89746] powerpc-none-eabi-gcc emits code using stfiwx to misaligned address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89746 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- (This is on a PowerPC 750). The compiler makes an unaligned store for this, because it knows no better than it is just a SImode store: d_5 = (int) f_4(D); _10 = (unsigned int) d_5; MEM[(short int

[Bug libfortran/89747] New: valgrind error in gfc_match_decl_type_spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89747 Bug ID: 89747 Summary: valgrind error in gfc_match_decl_type_spec Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortr

[Bug target/89746] powerpc-none-eabi-gcc emits code using stfiwx to misaligned address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89746 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't think this is directly an issue. If you don't want unaligned accesses from happening and your "kernel" does not support unaligned fix ups, then you need to use -mstrict-align .

[Bug target/89746] New: powerpc-none-eabi-gcc emits code using stfiwx to misaligned address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89746 Bug ID: 89746 Summary: powerpc-none-eabi-gcc emits code using stfiwx to misaligned address Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/85797] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85797 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #3 from

[Bug libstdc++/52114] SFINAE out the rvalue iostream operators to give better error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52114 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug libstdc++/89740] reading from cin & writing to cout sync_with_stdio(false) has race conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89740 --- Comment #4 from bert hubert --- I did a longer writeup here, where I tentatively conclude this is not a bug, just highly unfortunate: https://ds9a.nl/articles/posts/iostreams-unexpected/

[Bug c++/89571] [9 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89571 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 20:07:26 2019 New Revision: 269746 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269746&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89571 - ICE with ill-formed noexcept on constructor. Earli

[Bug fortran/82205] parametrized derived types, problems with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82205 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- See pr84120 for the analysis.

[Bug fortran/84094] several correctness issues in gfortran.dg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094 Bug 84094 depends on bug 84120, which changed state. Bug 84120 Summary: Syntax for used for PDT constructors is incorrect https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84120 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/82205] parametrized derived types, problems with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82205 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com -

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 Bug 82173 depends on bug 84120, which changed state. Bug 84120 Summary: Syntax for used for PDT constructors is incorrect https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84120 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/84120] Syntax for used for PDT constructors is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84120 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/88805] hidden symbol `__cpu_model' is referenced by DSO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88805 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Okay, since this a downstream bug, moving back to waiting. Is this really a gfortran bug?

[Bug testsuite/89666] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-39.c scan-ipa-dump-times icf "Unified;" 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89666 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/89666] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-39.c scan-ipa-dump-times icf "Unified;" 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89666 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Mar 17 17:59:03 2019 New Revision: 269742 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269742&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/89666 * c-c++-common/builtin-has-attrib

[Bug fortran/42122] [F03] -fdump-tree-original shows wrong static decl for functions with procptr argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42122 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Is this eight-year old PR fixed or not? Should I close this PR as FIXED to get an answer?

[Bug fortran/71861] [7/8/9 Regression] [F03] ICE in write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/58074] [C++11][DR 1333] __is_trivial intrinsic fails for deleted members and for non-trivial copy-c'tors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58074 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #0) > > The deleted default constructor should not prevent type Trivial of being > > trivial (Maybe this part of the

[Bug libfortran/79134] Implicit declaration of free due to missing include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79134 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89743] [concepts] ICE when using decltype(requires-expr) as type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89743 --- Comment #2 from Jason Cobb --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > GCC 8 gives: > > c.cc:5:23: error: expected nested-name-specifier > using type = typename use_type^~ >

[Bug fortran/71861] [7/8/9 Regression] [F03] ICE in write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/88750] [9 Regression] runtime error in statically linked binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88750 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87015] [8/9 Regression] miscompilation of template heavy Boost Spirit code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87015 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78865] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:473

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/89745] [[no_unique_address]] has no effect in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89745 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- T

[Bug fortran/88750] [9 Regression] runtime error in statically linked binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88750 --- Comment #37 from Jürgen Reuter --- I'm inclined to advice to close this PR. In principle, it would be good to follow up on this and see which change around Christmas 2018 triggered this, but I fear we don't have the personpower atm.

[Bug fortran/88750] [9 Regression] runtime error in statically linked binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88750 --- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Any progress? Is it really a gfortran bug?

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The tests in comment 0 and 5 compile if I replace '(1:)' with something such as '(1:3)'.

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 45715, which changed state. Bug 45715 Summary: [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45715 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/37577] [meta-bug] change internal array descriptor format for better syntax, C interop TR, rank 15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37577 Bug 37577 depends on bug 45715, which changed state. Bug 45715 Summary: [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45715 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/48419] Reduce gfortran stack usage for procedures doing IO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48419 Bug 48419 depends on bug 45715, which changed state. Bug 45715 Summary: [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45715 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45715] [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45715 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61261] [OOP] Segfault on source-allocating polymorphic variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/89745] [[no_unique_address]] has no effect in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89745 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Right, this is how it's supposed to work. Two different objects of the same type must have unique addresses.

[Bug fortran/67123] ICE with source allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67123 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89743] [concepts] ICE when using decltype(requires-expr) as type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89743 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Status|UNCONF

[Bug fortran/84394] [7/8 Regression] compiler error when using modules with derived types in block data subprograms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84394] [7/8 Regression] compiler error when using modules with derived types in block data subprograms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Mar 17 12:54:29 2019 New Revision: 269741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269741&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-03-17 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84394 Backport f

[Bug fortran/84394] [7/8 Regression] compiler error when using modules with derived types in block data subprograms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Mar 17 12:45:33 2019 New Revision: 269740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269740&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-03-17 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84394 Backport f

[Bug c++/79308] ICE on specialization of nested template classes (in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2963)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79308 --- Comment #6 from bjhend --- (In reply to Volker Reichelt from comment #5) > IMHO the testcase is invalid (e.g. clang rejects it). > But by changing the line > struct Element::WriteOutput > into > struct Element::WriteOutput > it can be tur

[Bug c++/89745] [[no_unique_address]] has no effect in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89745 tower120 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81866] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with a default template parameter which is a template class nested in a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-09-11 00:00:00 |2019-3-17 CC|

[Bug c++/89745] New: [[no_unique_address]] has no effect in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89745 Bug ID: 89745 Summary: [[no_unique_address]] has no effect in some cases Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/79308] ICE on specialization of nested template classes (in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2963)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79308 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org De

[Bug c++/89744] [8/9 Regression] ICE with specialization of nested template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89744 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.4

[Bug c++/89744] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE with specialization of nested template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89744 Bug ID: 89744 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE with specialization of nested template class Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-co

[Bug fortran/68009] [7/8/9 Regression] prototype for gfortran_runtime_error with inline matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/89523] Incorrect AVX instructions with VSIB address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89523 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sun Mar 17 09:27:56 2019 New Revision: 269739 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269739&root=gcc&view=rev Log: x32: Add addr32 prefix to VSIB address 32-bit indices in VSIB addr

qhh提%%供%%税%%栗%zT

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org + 润匀   可  办 税 票，认 证 后 付  歀。   详   电：李 生，136—6075— 4190，    业   q：157— 533— 2698 ---

[Bug target/89523] Incorrect AVX instructions with VSIB address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89523 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sun Mar 17 09:11:22 2019 New Revision: 269738 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269738&root=gcc&view=rev Log: x32: Add addr32 prefix to VSIB address 32-bit indices in VSIB addr

[Bug c++/87015] [8/9 Regression] miscompilation of template heavy Boost Spirit code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87015 Daniel Starke changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.0 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Starke

[Bug middle-end/87256] hppa spends huge amount of time in synth_mult()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87256 --- Comment #8 from Matt Turner --- This xxhash.c file is embedded in many different projects, and is really causing problems on gentoo/hppa: zstandard: Fri Mar 15 14:16:42 2019: 7 hours, 29 minutes, 49 seconds Are we any closer to a fix than w

[Bug rtl-optimization/89487] [7/8 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7993

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89487 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- On the trunk it is fine, but it needs to be backported to 8 (and the dup bug shows that to 7 as well).