https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Larmour ---
Just to confirm with concrete values from a real program:
myhandler2() is at 0x23a8 (which means the branch target address if the
function is called should be 0x23a9 with LS bit set to indicate Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89261
Bug ID: 89261
Summary: ix86_data_alignment has wrong argument type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88066
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Feb 9 00:40:31 2019
New Revision: 268714
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/88066 use <> for includes not ""
Using #include "..." to in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71044
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Feb 9 00:25:39 2019
New Revision: 268713
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268713&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add noexcept to filesystem::path query functions
In the standard these m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85494
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343
--- Comment #30 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Feb 8 22:20:58 2019
New Revision: 268708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268708&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RS6000] Correct save_reg_p
Fixes lack of r30 save/restore on
// -m32 -fp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89214
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
But we actually called reshape_init:
7146 expr = reshape_init (totype, expr, complain);
7147 expr = get_target_expr_sfinae (digest_init (totype, expr,
complain),
7148
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89259
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On February 8, 2019 6:35:29 PM GMT+01:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
>
>--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>FRE doesn't, as that br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88739
--- Comment #56 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 8 19:01:37 2019
New Revision: 268706
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268706&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/88739
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr8873
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 8 19:01:10 2019
New Revision: 268705
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268705&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/88560
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #31 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I think it is important to find out why there are those differences in line
> numbers. Is libbacktrace broken on Solaris, or not used at all, something
> different?
The libsanitizer does its private unwi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #25)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #22)
> > A function call must be assumed to clobber any call used registers of
> > course.
> > But calls already do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #25 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #22)
> A function call must be assumed to clobber any call used registers of course.
> But calls already do have vops (well, const/pure don't, and I don't think we
-archives --enable-libstdcxx-time
--enable-fully-dynamic-string --enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-lto
--enable-libgomp --enable-checking=release
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.2.1 20190208 (GCC)
Harfbuzz CFLAGS/LDFLAGS:
-g0 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89256
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
FRE doesn't, as that breaks the #c9 testcase.
a = 1;
__asm__("add %1, %0" : "=r" o_12 : "r" a, "0" 0);
__asm__ __volatile__("xor %%eax, %%eax" : : : "eax");
i_13 = 1;
a = 1;
__asm__("add %1, %0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On February 8, 2019 6:25:09 PM GMT+01:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
>
>--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>(In reply to Alexander
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88761
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88995
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89212
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #21)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> > We could cache a bool in struct function whether the function has any local
> > hard register vars and just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89260
Bug ID: 89260
Summary: ICE in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at lto/lto.c:2800
while compiling harfbuzz
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #21 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> We could cache a bool in struct function whether the function has any local
> hard register vars and just propagate that info during inlining etc. and
> jus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88995
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89090
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That doesn't work. I don't get to control every G++ users' build system.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89259
Bug ID: 89259
Summary: liboffloadmic/runtime/offload_omp_host.cpp:692:
pointless test ?
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89258
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89258
--- Comment #2 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jozefl
Date: Fri Feb 8 16:47:28 2019
New Revision: 268704
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268704&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Jozef Lawrynowicz
PR testsuite/89258
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89258
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89090
--- Comment #7 from Csaba Ráduly ---
Don't be sad, use -std=c++17 :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89151
--- Comment #4 from Csaba Ráduly ---
As I said, GCC trunk (9) can compile this example.
Did you check with the released 8.2.0 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89258
Bug ID: 89258
Summary: [9 Regression] verify_gimple failed in gimple test
pr80887 for 16-bit target
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19)
> Not sure if it
> is generally advised/done to use scratch registers by simply clobbering
> them.
It is often done. Advised... I cannot think of a good
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45645|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
--- Comment #3 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45646
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45646&action=edit
Change log for gcc/fortran for patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
--- Comment #4 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45647
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45647&action=edit
Change Log for testsuite for patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
--- Comment #2 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45645
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45645&action=edit
Fix return kind for max and min
Also includes update to the intrinsic documentation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at ookypooky dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89257
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89257
--- Comment #1 from Matt A ---
Apologies, I should have clarified this is on x86_64:
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/software/thirdparty/gcc/7.2.0-0.el7_64/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/software/thirdparty/gcc/7.2.0-0.el7_64/libexec/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89257
Bug ID: 89257
Summary: Bad optimisation at -O3 with vector of pairs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89246
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
--- Comment #5 from Kochise ---
"The pointer I access is volatile, not the uint32_t behind"
Understand this :
((volatile MyRegDef*) ADDR)->enable; <- TYPO in the original message I couldn't
edit
Not this :
typedef union MyRegDef
{ struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88752
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Note this fix caused 89241, so it probably crashes with gcc-8 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89246
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88752
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:49:58 2019
New Revision: 268701
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88752 - ICE with lambda and constexpr if.
* cp-tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88761
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:50:03 2019
New Revision: 268702
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268702&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88761 - ICE with reference capture of constant.
Here, we c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86943
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:49:43 2019
New Revision: 268700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86943 - wrong code converting generic lambda to pointer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89256
Bug ID: 89256
Summary: No optimized division by constant for __int128
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:38:31 2019
New Revision: 268699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88112
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:34:49 2019
New Revision: 268698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86736
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:34:49 2019
New Revision: 268698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:34:49 2019
New Revision: 268698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87187
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:34:49 2019
New Revision: 268698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87295
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:34:49 2019
New Revision: 268698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87229
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:34:49 2019
New Revision: 268698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89209
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
HWell, no. We create a special default-def SSA to insert into the IL
the information that an uninitialized value is being loaded but now
the SSA has aggregate type, which should not happen, I guess (even
tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65229
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87787
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65229
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:16:09 2019
New Revision: 268693
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268693&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/65229 fix pretty printer for std::bitset<0>
Backport from m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89128
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88119
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:14:57 2019
New Revision: 268690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/88119 use alignof in std::alignment_of, not __alignof__
Now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88119
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87308
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:15:36 2019
New Revision: 268692
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268692&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87308 adjust regex used in std::any pretty printer
The rege
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87787
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:16:28 2019
New Revision: 268694
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268694&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87787 avoid undefined null args to memcpy and memmove
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88166
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Feb 8 14:15:36 2019
New Revision: 268692
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268692&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87308 adjust regex used in std::any pretty printer
The rege
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89128
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But you can include it in C++, because the header exists. If you just include
it an do nothing, there's no problem (it's not part of the C++ standard and so
your program is not portable, conforming C++, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88656
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
--- Comment #33 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
I am testing the following fix: since we already decided about mangling
we are in fact safe to remove everything that does not have assembler
name on it.
Honza
Index: tree.c
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89255
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89255
Bug ID: 89255
Summary: libphobos.unittests multilib handling broken
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87446
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
--- Comment #7 from pere at hungry dot com ---
I just think it would have been useful if the compiler said something
like 'header file is not defined/available in C++' or
something like that. It would provide feedback to the developer even if
'n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 8 13:21:36 2019
New Revision: 268689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-02-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/89247
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89247
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89252
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 45643
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45643&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89249
--- Comment #3 from Liviu Ionescu ---
Hi Richard,
Thank you for taking the time to investigate.
Indeed, COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER is escaped, while COMPILER_PATH is not:
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=c:/users/ilg/desktop/8.2.1\ \ \ \ \
1.4-20190207-1853/bin/.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
--- Comment #4 from Kochise ---
The pointer I access is volatile, not the uint32_t behind. Why would I ? The
'volatile' keyword has no meaning to change the data size being processed, only
removing the caching behavior of the compiler.
If the co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89254
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89254
Bug ID: 89254
Summary: std.net.curl and std.parallelism unittests hang
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89252
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88084
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83511
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89253
Bug ID: 89253
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in split_loop, at
tree-ssa-loop-split.c:566
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
