https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89252

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We're expanding from

foo (struct S * x)
{
  <bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
  *x_2(D) = array[0];
  MEM[(struct S *)x_2(D) + 320B] = array[1];

not sure why we end up constant-folding the loads given 'array' cannot be
elided.

Reply via email to