https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88054
Bug ID: 88054
Summary: Sanitizer triggers on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45013|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 45018
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45018&action=edit
Standalone test case
Here is somewhat smaller standalone test case. Looking at assembly
differences, it loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergej at schumilo dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81397
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> As we're staying with Awk, for now I'm planning to work on that.
Missing the word "not" in there?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66601
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
--- Comment #1 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #0)
> After r266171 this test case is hanging on powerpc64 both be and le when
> compiled with -O3. If I run it via make check
>
> make -k check-fortran
> RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25759
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25759
--- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Fri Nov 16 00:50:41 2018
New Revision: 266199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266199&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-15 Sandra Loosemore
PR c++/25759
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87855
--- Comment #5 from Ville Voutilainen ---
New patch is at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01368.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88053
Bug ID: 88053
Summary: [9 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr54625-1.C fails with
r266194
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052
Bug ID: 88052
Summary: Format contravening f2008 constraint C1002 permitted
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87541
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.3.0, 9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87533
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83546
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87542
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Nov 15 22:53:57 2018
New Revision: 266195
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266195&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/87541 - ICE using a constant decl as an attribute alloc_size argume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87541
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Nov 15 22:53:57 2018
New Revision: 266195
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266195&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/87541 - ICE using a constant decl as an attribute alloc_size argume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88051
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83656
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83656
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Nov 15 22:18:54 2018
New Revision: 266194
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266194&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/83656 - missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on declaration without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88051
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88047
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The following patch restores the errors
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/match.c 2018-11-01 22:06:33.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/match.c 2018-11-15 22:47:01.0 +0100
@@ -1374,7 +1374,8 @@ gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88036
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
--- Comment #4 from Chris Elrod ---
Created attachment 45016
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45016&action=edit
Assembly from compiling gfortran_internal_pack_test.f90
The code takes in sets of 3-length vectors and 3x3 symmet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88051
Bug ID: 88051
Summary: internal compiler error: in add_clobbers, at
config/i386/sync.md:1762
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88043
--- Comment #2 from Zach Jibben ---
I'll also add that removing the non_overridable attribute from bar%f (B%sub in
Neil's example) causes the error to disappear, and seems like the most
reasonable workaround for the time being.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992
Chris Elrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||elrodc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 15 19:54:25 2018
New Revision: 266193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266193&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/86246] ICE tsubst explicit operator call
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed trunk r266193.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed trunk r266193.
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 15 19:54:25 2018
New Revision: 266193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266193&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88043
--- Comment #1 from Neil Carlson ---
I've been poking at Zach's example and trimmed it down a bit:
In one file:
module typeA
implicit none
private
type, abstract, public :: A
contains
procedure :: call_sub
procedure(z), deferr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521
James Y Knight changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||foom at fuhm dot net
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88048
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88047
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88050
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88050
Bug ID: 88050
Summary: Add a warning for breaking the "Rule of Three"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 86424, which changed state.
Bug 86424 Summary: Milc is slower on PowerPC using -ffast-math than without
using -ffast-math
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86424
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86424
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86423
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 86423, which changed state.
Bug 86423 Summary: Omnetpp is slower on PowerPC using -ffast-math than not
using -ffast-math
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86423
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
But the Comment 5 testcase actually started ICEing with r216750, which makes it
a dup of PR80864.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88049
Bug ID: 88049
Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in
lto_symtab_prevailing_virtual_decl at
gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c:1075 since r231671
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
And even more:
struct S {};
struct A { S s[1]; };
template
struct R { static constexpr auto h = A{S{}}; };
A foo = R::h;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
- if (char_type != char_type_node
- && char_type != signed_char_type_node
- && char_type != unsigned_char_type_node)
+ if (char_type != char_type_node)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88048
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Invalid code nearby, down to at least gcc-5 :
$ cat z4.f90
subroutine s(x)
integer, allocatable :: x(:)
data x(1:2) /3, 4/
end
$ gfortran-9-2018 -c z4.f90
f951: internal compiler error: Segmenta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88048
Bug ID: 88048
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in check_data_variable, at
fortran/resolve.c:15491
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88047
Bug ID: 88047
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_vtab, at
fortran/class.c:2843
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77412
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #3 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-11-15
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046
Bug ID: 88046
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in
add_data_member_location_attribute at
gcc/dwarf2out.c:19237 since r261885
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69493
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
I'll note that Kelvin's r256656 commit fixed the test case in Comment 6 because
we know the loads and stores are sufficiently aligned and there are loads and
stores that will do the correct byte swap in LE mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> Is there some critical use of this that we would want to have for GCC 9?
I don't think making it work as I suggested is critical for GCC 9 in comment
#0. I noticed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Slightly more reduced:
template
struct A { T e[N]; };
template
A(T)->A;
struct S {};
template
struct R { static constexpr auto h = A{S{}}; };
void
fn ()
{
A foo = R::h;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kretz at kde dot org
--- Comment #7 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61727
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
This was originally about the #pragma simd in CIlk+, which has been removed.
But it lives on in #pragma omp simd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> For some yes. I assume not e.g. for nvptx as it has 64-bit size_t but can't
> compile it for other reasons.
Ok, I'll make sure to check that.
The new error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045
Bug ID: 88045
Summary: Call to std::accumulate causes gcov to crash
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Bug ID: 88044
Summary: [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90
hangs after r266171
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88043
Bug ID: 88043
Summary: Runtime Error when calling deferred member function
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88037
--- Comment #3 from Christian Walther ---
> It's possible somebody really wants to print the whole of their huge string
> (and has the memory to make it work).
Fair point. I figured that someone wanting to read a legitimately huge string
would r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz ---
Yes, looks like a duplicate of 86246.
==+
| 9.0.0 20181115 (experimental) [trunk revision 266169] (aarch64-suse-linux)
GCC error:|
| output_operand: invalid address mode |
| Error detected around
/opt/gcc/gcc-20181115/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/rt_signals.adb:14:5|
This is the offending insn:
(insn 13 11 14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836
--- Comment #11 from Gary Mills ---
Well, I got the same ICE when the compiler was built with -O0. It always seems
to happen during the configure tests, always this one:
configure:3662: checking for suffix of object files
configure:3684:
/expor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88031
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Thanks for testing GCC 9!
You are welcome.
Just an amateur project. I could get more serious about this,
given enough encouragement.
For example all of Fed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88041
Bug ID: 88041
Summary: gdc.test tests should include that prefix in test
names
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88038
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Build log is when testing r265361 from a couple weeks back.
Looking at recent history, the assert has been removed from the function since
then.
I'll trigger a rebuild to see if its still happening.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88037
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Christian Walther from comment #0)
> +# multigigabyte string would run GDB out of memory.
> +return ptr.string(length = 100) + ('... (length: %d)' % length)
Instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88040
Bug ID: 88040
Summary: gdc silently ignores -ffile-prefix-map
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
Bug ID: 88039
Summary: gdc.test/compilable/ddoc12.d FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88038
Bug ID: 88038
Summary: ICE: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155: recipe for target
'all-stage3-isl' failed
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88037
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For some yes. I assume not e.g. for nvptx as it has 64-bit size_t but can't
compile it for other reasons.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Yeah, that is the goal. And you should either add msp430-*-* to dg-skip-if,
> or do we have some effective targets for all targets with 16-bit size_t (or
> p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88037
Bug ID: 88037
Summary: std::string pretty printer causes "virtual memory
exhausted" when used on uninitialized data
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88036
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Slightly simpler testcase, that doesn't need the attribute to avoid the
-Wunused-variable warning:
int food = 0;
void* f()
{
undeclared_type fool;
return &fool;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88036
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I realise this is non-trivial, because the erroneous declaration may not even
have been parsed as a declaration.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88036
Bug ID: 88036
Summary: bogus "was not declared in this scope; did you mean
...?" fix-it when the declaration was ill-formed
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, that is the goal. And you should either add msp430-*-* to dg-skip-if, or
do we have some effective targets for all targets with 16-bit size_t (or
perhaps < 32-bit), so that we could skip them all at on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #4 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Thanks, the patch fixes the ICE on msp430-elf and the test now outputs:
> gcc.c-torture/compile/pr46534.c:17:3: error: size of string literal is too
> large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88035
Bug ID: 88035
Summary: missing _mm512_reduce_round_pd() et al
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87751
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165
--- Comment #25 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:32:41 2018
New Revision: 266186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Machine-readable diagnostic output (PR other/19165)
This patch implem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:31:35 2018
New Revision: 266185
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266185&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined ref
https://gcc.gnu
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
