https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > Is there some critical use of this that we would want to have for GCC 9? I don't think making it work as I suggested is critical for GCC 9 in comment #0. I noticed it while testing the new -Wattribute-alias/-Wmissing-attributes options with Glibc, but (AFAICT) Glibc doesn't actually depend on the inlining attributes for aliases working this way. It would make sense to me to issue a warning for this use case until it is implemented (if it ever is).
