https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777
--- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #14)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #13)
> > >
> > > I've tried that test case with the sh-lra branch and the problems seem to
> > > be
> > > gone.
> >
> > S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28472
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Created attachment 44778
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44778&action=edit
Proprosed patch
FYI, this is what I'm testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56951
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2)
> Seems to work fine on BE, so probably a LE only issue.
So this is a generic problem, not related to LE. I can get this to fail on BE
as well if I strategically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87493
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, paste fail. The second one should be:
#include
#include
int main()
{
std::locale::global(std::locale("en_US.UTF-8"));
std::wstring s = L"joão méroço";
std::wregex r{L"[[:alpha:]]{4} [[:alph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #12 from Tim Shen ---
I'm not sure anymore about the meaning of pinging back end (my bad), but
> But this is (assuming wchar_t uses a unicode encoding):
The two pieces of code looks identical to me. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #16 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Thomas,
I think that the copy in/copy out might be rather easy to arrange.
Give me a couple of days.
Paul
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 22:01, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
> http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Of course, there should be a "return false;" in there as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
This would reject the obvious non-contiguous cases.
Index: interface.c
===
--- interface.c (Revision 264540)
+++ interface.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #5 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
Hi, any news of this for GCC 9? I'm guessing it requires a bit more changes,
hopefully not forgotten though. Currently I'm using a custom patched GCC 8 for
it (and to test plugin behavior with it) but it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #31 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No, it's marked as a regression against gcc-6. One of two things needs to
happen for this to be closed.
1. Aldy's work would have to be backported to gcc-6.
or
2. gcc-6 goes out of support
I don't thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87494
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is techincally a bug. It might be a missed optimization but
not a bug. You still need a definition even for constexpr if used outside of a
constexpr usage IIRC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chtz at informatik dot
uni-bremen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87503
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55713
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Now that we have [[no_unique_address]] I'll make our std::tuple use it (I think
I have a partial implementation in a local branch, that I couldn't compile when
I started work on it).
I don't plan to work o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
So this seems to be coming from ira-costs.c:ira_tune_allocno_costs()
/* Some targets allow pseudos to be allocated to unaligned sequences
of hard registers. However, selecting an unaligned se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|Wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87508
--- Comment #2 from Zachary Wilcox ---
Thank you sir. I should have checked the changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87508
Bug ID: 87508
Summary: unrecognized command line option '-mfloat-gprs=double'
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
So the register pair r7,r8 is free to assign to TImode pseudo 126 in
assign_hard_reg(), but its cost is 1000, while the cost of r30,r31 somehow
looks to be zero, so we choose it instead!?!? Not sure how r30,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86592
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55713
Bug 55713 depends on bug 63579, which changed state.
Bug 63579 Summary: New attribute for empty member optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63579
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63579
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87506
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux
--- Comment #2 from Pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87507
Bug ID: 87507
Summary: IRA unnecessarily uses non-volatile registers during
register assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87506
Bug ID: 87506
Summary: ICE with inherited constexpr constructor with const
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87415
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Oct 3 17:36:29 2018
New Revision: 264817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/87415
* tree-vrp.c (set_value_range_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87415
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Fixed in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 85334, which changed state.
Bug 85334 Summary: Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Oct 3 16:55:06 2018
New Revision: 264814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Remove _Unwind_Frames_Increment
CET kernel has been changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87434
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87505
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87505
Bug ID: 87505
Summary: Vectorizer generates a lot of code for a small loop
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87504
Bug ID: 87504
Summary: inconsistent diagnostic style between C and C++
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87503
Bug ID: 87503
Summary: Spurious -Wunused-but-set-variable warning in template
function
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87502
Bug ID: 87502
Summary: Poor code generation for std::string("c-style string")
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87498
--- Comment #1 from Miro Kropacek ---
> For x86_64's gmp, host is passed as "none-pc-linux-gnu", thus disabling
> assembly and passing -DNO_ASM to CFLAGS from gmp's configure (making the
> toplevel AM_CFLAGS useless).
I must correct myself her
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87156
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Paul Hua from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> > Does the attached patch fix the bootstrap?
> > Index: cgraphclones.c
> > ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149
--- Comment #10 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Thanks Andreas,
I am clearly not casting the initializer correctly. I'll try to figure
out what is correct tomorrow.
Best regards
Paul
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 13:39, sch...@linux-m68k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87493
Aleksey Covacevice changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksey.covacevice at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86592
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like it is fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87483
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87494
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87501
Bug ID: 87501
Summary: lto1: error: Alias and target's section differs
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab ---
This generates wrong code on powerpc64, either the initializer or the size of
_F.myptr_mod_MOD_number_string is wrong.
.globl _F.myptr_mod_MOD_number_string
.align 3
.type _F.myptr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87500
Bug ID: 87500
Summary: ICE in discriminator_for_local_entity, at
cp/mangle.c:1967
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59439
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The testcase now scales with the number of CPUs, instead of running effectively
single-threaded.
If the global locale is changed so std::locale() != std::locale::classic() then
every thread contends for t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71430
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87499
Bug ID: 87499
Summary: error: invalid conversion in gimple call for a nested
function with lto
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87498
Bug ID: 87498
Summary: Inconsistent behaviour for passing -DNO_ASM and
host=none
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87497
Bug ID: 87497
Summary: constexprs involving non-literal const variables are
incorrectly accepted
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59439
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59439
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 3 11:27:40 2018
New Revision: 264811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59439 optimize uses of classic ("C") std::locale
The globa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 3 10:58:43 2018
New Revision: 264809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/87353 fix formatting and grammar in manual
The changes to invok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 3 10:58:49 2018
New Revision: 264810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/87353 fix formatting and grammar in manual
The changes to invok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Unfortunately can't reproduce even with your complete option list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496
Bug ID: 87496
Summary: ICE in aggregate_value_p at gcc/function.c:2046
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #11)
> (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #10)
> > Even if that were allowed, the standard explicitly disallows the
> > argument association in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87495
Bug ID: 87495
Summary: Warning: ‘fastcall’ attribute ignored [-Wattributes]
for !GCC$ ATTRIBUTES
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Summary|Hidden me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87493
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86109
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87494
Bug ID: 87494
Summary: hidden visibility constexpr variables left unevaluated
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71140
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86109
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 3 09:24:38 2018
New Revision: 264807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r264806
2018-10-03 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86087
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87406
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> Is clang's -Wbitfield-constant-conversion anything like the
> -Wbitfield-conversion flag requested in bug 39170?
It's similar, but if I see correctly the LLVM war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
% x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-9.0.0-alpha20180930 -O2 -fschedule-insns
-fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-split-wide-types -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87482
--- Comment #4 from Peter Smith ---
Thanks very much for the clarification.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
So, is this fixed as duplicate of PR69515?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86109
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.2.1
Known to fail|8.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86087
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Indeed, I cannot reproduce it w/ gcc-9.0.0-alpha20180930 (r264727).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86109
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Oct 3 08:30:10 2018
New Revision: 264806
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264806&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly mark lambdas in GCOV (PR gcov-profile/86109).
2018-10-03 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87491
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.2.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87330
--- Comment #5 from sameerad at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The original regrename pass is renaming the register x19 to x25, however, the
expr_list which holds the dead register information is not updated accordingly.
Hence, there is a conflict of regist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86087
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87491
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
92 matches
Mail list logo
