https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43105
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81958
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #1)
> So I see a couple things here.
>
> In DOM we do catch the fact that eqidx will have the value zero if the loop
> does not iterate. But the equivalence we recor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87099
Bug ID: 87099
Summary: internal compiler error: segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86872
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Aug 24 23:37:53 2018
New Revision: 263845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Set start_location to 0 if we ran out of line map space
With profi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82967
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86837
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86837
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 24 22:08:48 2018
New Revision: 263844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-08-24 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87052
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87091
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Aug 24 21:17:48 2018
New Revision: 263843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
diagnostics: tweaks to line-spans vs line numbering (PR 87091)
This pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87098
Ron Young changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87098
Bug ID: 87098
Summary: compiling program icetime.cc for icestorm fpga
toolchain throws internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87076
--- Comment #4 from Vladislav Ivanishin ---
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> On x86_64 the actual -march switch isn't serialized but it is decomposed into
> individual -mFEATURE switches by the driver which are serialized.
>
>
> The -marc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87097
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87097
Bug ID: 87097
Summary: value-initialization of an array of more than 1
element not treated as a constant initializer
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> A replacement for MetaHTML is already available, we just need to switch to
> using it.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00176.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87041
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
-Wformat-overflow already warns for null pointers. I don't recall any bug
reports about it so it shouldn't be too bad.
void f (char *d, char *p)
{
if (p) return;
__builtin_sprintf (d, "%s", p);
}
warni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
A replacement for MetaHTML is already available, we just need to switch to
using it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00176.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87041
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I don't think we want to move it there, that will mean lots of false positives
due to jump threading etc.
It is a good thing this is a FE warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87096
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87096
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86545
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87041
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #21 from Martin Sebor ---
As discussed on IRC this morning, I hope the following patch will avoid having
to apply the VRP workaround:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01563.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist ---
I looked through some mails in the archives, and I learned that the current
wwwdocs uses metahtml, which hasn't been maintained for years and years, and
doesn't even compile anymore. Ugh!
For an even more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87041
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Church ---
I agree it's a good idea to warn if the code is reachable, but if not, it's
only so much noise.
I can see that in this case the second const makes no difference to code
generation, but I'd prefer not to modi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87096
Bug ID: 87096
Summary: "Optimised" snprintf is not POSIX conformant
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
URL: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functi
ons/snprint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86822
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86545
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #5)
> I'm now testing the following patch, which fixes the problem:
Regtests cleanly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86822
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Aug 24 18:24:42 2018
New Revision: 263841
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263841&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
new(nothrow) is malloc-like
2018-08-24 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612
--- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Is there anything left to "fix" here?
Fully dynamic string should help the COW string cases.
The new __cxx11::basic_string fully supports C++11 allocators and so should
work with allocators using "fancy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20150
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I thought this was by design, because it ensures we never return a null
pointer, and that any two calls to allocate will return different values.
I'm inclined to close this as WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86545
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87095
Bug ID: 87095
Summary: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer vptr false positive with
virtual inheritance only with -fno-sanitize-recover
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86837
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 24 17:26:57 2018
New Revision: 263838
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263838&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-08-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/86837
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87092
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Aug 24 16:58:27 2018
New Revision: 263837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR middle-end/87092
PR middle-end/87092
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30812
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #18)
> BTW, the suggest patch in comment 10 causes an x86-64 regression on
> gcc.dg/attr-nonstring-3.c because of some incompatibility with ssizetype and
> sizetype.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87073
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87092
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87073 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> On x86-64:
>
> [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 gcc]$ cat x.c
> int a, b;
>
> void
> c(void) {
> if (b)
> b = a / b;
> }
> [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O3 -funroll-loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez ---
BTW, the suggest patch in comment 10 causes an x86-64 regression on
gcc.dg/attr-nonstring-3.c because of some incompatibility with ssizetype and
sizetype. I believe it's related to this:
https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
On x86-64:
[hjl@gnu-cfl-1 gcc]$ cat x.c
int a, b;
void
c(void) {
if (b)
b = a / b;
}
[hjl@gnu-cfl-1 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -fwrapv -S x.c
during GIMPLE pass: evrp
x.c: In functio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87093
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87094
Bug ID: 87094
Summary: Suboptimal accounting for stack growth in inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez ---
On 08/24/2018 11:41 AM, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
>
> --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87028
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86942
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86942
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86942
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Aug 24 15:48:43 2018
New Revision: 263836
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263836&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67012
PR c++/86942
* decl.c (grokdeclara
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67012
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67012
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Aug 24 15:48:43 2018
New Revision: 263836
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263836&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67012
PR c++/86942
* decl.c (grokdeclara
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #12)
> (It really irks me that the PPC backend has backend behavior that depends on
> what assembler (or cross assembler) is available at configure time. It
> m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> This bug also happens on x86-64.
Would you happen to have a preprocessed testcase on x86-64?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux |
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
This bug al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
BTW, this is reproducible with an x86-64 cross by forcing the generation of
cmpstrnsi with -mcpu=cell and the following patch:
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
index 9ea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86953
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87073
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87086
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
My bad. This is a duplicate but of pr87073, which is now fixed on mainline.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87073 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82967
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01542.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
Joey Ye changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joey.ye at arm dot com
--- Comment #36 from Jo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87075
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87047
--- Comment #11 from Michael_S ---
Sorry for intervening, but IMHO a new __builtin is long overdue.
__builtin
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #8)
> > Well, original_costs is already initia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68222
--- Comment #4 from Tony E Lewis ---
Yes - Godbolt's GCC trunk is now showing an error where I'd expect within the
original repro code.
Great stuff. Thanks very much for your work on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87093
Bug ID: 87093
Summary: is_constructible (__is_constructible() instrinsic)
explicitly instantiates conversion member function of
source
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86973
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz ---
FWIW, the testcase is broken since it can be compiled, namely since
the two attributes ms_abi and sysv_abi are accepted, which is r137525 from
2008. Only broken with -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args of course.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87047
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Monakov ---
Scaling costs by edge probabilities would also solve this issue, perhaps in a
cleaner way.
(to be clear: if speed_p, instead of taking the weird faux-minimum, add to
original_cost the linear combination
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87059
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87092
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87080
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Summary|ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87077
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87047
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #8)
> Well, original_costs is already initialized with COSTS_N_INSNS (2),
> accounting for test and branch that would be removed. So it's not too bad:
> in pr78120.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80093
trashyankes at wp dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87092
Bug ID: 87092
Summary: [9 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87047
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Treating the missing else cost as 0 cost isn't right either, it is ok to
> accept some small cost, otherwise we wouldn't do the if conversion ever with
> miss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87091
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
trashyankes at wp dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87091
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Looks a lot like the issue I fixed in r263606.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at codesourcery dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87091
Bug ID: 87091
Summary: Malformed fix-it hint for missing header
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87087
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
... and started with r257441.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87039
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, I think this got broken with PR78363 r244892.
Before that the early_global_decl hooks are only called on the functions when
all the functions are lowered and thus the BLOCKs moved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87077
--- Comment #3 from trashyankes at wp dot pl ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Can you attach the source please? These stupid Web 2.0 sites do not allow
> to save it to a file.
Code:
```
#include
#include
struct alignas(32)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87087
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to felix from comment #7)
> I made the feature closely mimic The Other Compiler's behaviour: only
> function built-ins are recognised. This includes generic functions like
> __builtin_add_overflo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87039
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think this shows a pretty major bug caused by the early dwarf changes - it
happens too early.
When OpenMP/OpenACC etc. does move_sese_region_to_fn, it duplicates the BLOCK
which is on the boundary and shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86989
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk; backports pending.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87085
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79342
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Aug 24 11:28:40 2018
New Revision: 263831
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263831&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DWARF: Call set_indirect_string on DW_MACINFO_start_file
Since -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87088
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
FWIW this was changed by r247222
2017-04-25 Bernd Edlinger
* c-common.c (c_type_hasher, type_hash_table): Remove.
(c_common_get_alias_set): Remove unreachable code.
* c-opts.c (c_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87090
Bug ID: 87090
Summary: Constexpr variables in functions are not optimized
correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87088
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
Bug ID: 87089
Summary: [9 regression] tree check: expected class 'type', have
'declaration' (namespace_decl) in type_with_linkage_p,
at ipa-utils.h
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87086
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1)
> Duplicate.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87059 ***
Are you sure this is a dup? PR 87059 seems to be about strncmp whereas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87088
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
