https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87075

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Indeed.  The VOID_CST elts of the CONSTRUCTOR come from the
8352              if (is_dummy_object (argarray[0]))
8353                return force_target_expr (DECL_CONTEXT (fn), void_node,
8354                                          no_cleanup_complain);
that patch added, and the constexpr handling code is upset that there is a
VOID_CST rather than CONSTRUCTOR inside of the elts.

Reply via email to