https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87075
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Indeed. The VOID_CST elts of the CONSTRUCTOR come from the
8352 if (is_dummy_object (argarray[0]))
8353 return force_target_expr (DECL_CONTEXT (fn), void_node,
8354 no_cleanup_complain);
that patch added, and the constexpr handling code is upset that there is a
VOID_CST rather than CONSTRUCTOR inside of the elts.