https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85221
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Same for declare-allocatable-3.f90 and declare-allocatable-4.f90:
...
$ grep 'internal compiler error:.*install_var_field'
libgomp.testsuite/libgomp.log | sed 's/.*\///' | sort -u
declare-allocatable-1.f90:157
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85221
Bug ID: 85221
Summary: [openacc] ICE in install_var_field, at omp-low.c:657
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85220
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
And for libgomp.oacc-fortran/fortran.exp:
...
$ cat libgomp.testsuite/libgomp.sum | grep ^FAIL:.*execution | grep -v /lib- |
sed 's/libgomp.oacc-fortran\///'
FAIL: avoid-offloading-1.f -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85213
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85220
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
I've copied the test-cases, and build r259123.
For libgomp.oacc-c/c.exp, we get:
...
$ cat libgomp.testsuite/libgomp.sum | grep ^FAIL:.*execution | grep -v /lib- |
sed 's/libgomp.oacc-c\/..\/libgomp.oacc-c-c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85220
Bug ID: 85220
Summary: [meta-bug, nvptx] Run trunk with og7 openacc testcases
and analyze execution failures
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80290
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84979
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Apr 5 04:26:36 2018
New Revision: 259124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/84979] reject auto in explicit tmpl args for tmpl-fn
With conc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 04:01:15 2018
New Revision: 259123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85215 - ICE with copy-init from conversion.
* call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85219
Bug ID: 85219
Summary: [GCOV] A "if(1) continue;" statement in a the else
block of "if(0)" statement is wrongly marked as
executed when surrounded by array delaration statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85199
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
(In reply to Yibiao Yang from comment #0)
> $ gcc -v
> gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper
> OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
> OFF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85218
Bug ID: 85218
Summary: [GCOV] A return statement in the if(0) block is
wrongly marked as executed when there is an array
index and an {array declare statement} around it in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85217
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
$ gcc -v
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85217
Bug ID: 85217
Summary: [GCOV] A no side effect statement between a break
statement and a continue statement will lead to
incorrect code coverage in gcov
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81776
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71218
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47316
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
One possibility is bad luck and the branch happens to fall on an address that
conflicts with another branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85209
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
--- Comment #6 from Timothy Pearson ---
Understood. I'll update this report if we find a way to get the predictor
working optimally in this scenario.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
--- Comment #4 from Timothy Pearson ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> This is 100% the equivalent code.
>
> jmp *(%r15) # opline.199_67->handler
> Does two things:
> loads a pointer from %r15 and then jumps to that pointer.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|2018-04-05 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
--- Comment #2 from Timothy Pearson ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #1)
> What two additional instructions? x86 is a CISC architecture and Power is a
> RISC architecture. x86 has an instruction that directly performs an
> indirect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
Bug ID: 85216
Summary: Performance issue with PHP on ppc64 systems
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84938
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 00:09:10 2018
New Revision: 259108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84938 - ICE with division by ~-1.
* call.c (set_up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84936
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84936
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 5 00:09:05 2018
New Revision: 259107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84936 - ICE with unexpanded pack in mem-initializer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47815
Adam Warner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
I don't think this is just an ICE on invalid: we can trivially fix the snippet
as:
template struct remove_reference {};
template struct remove_reference<_Tp &> {
typedef _Tp type;
};
template
constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Started somewhere between r258751 (unaffected) and r258755 (affected)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85215
Bug ID: 85215
Summary: "gcc_assert (!force_elide);" failure
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83402
--- Comment #9 from Steven Munroe ---
I suggested fixing the emmintrin.h source for both eventually ...
If you only fix AT11 then sometime later some will discover the difference and
try fix it. And likely break it again.
So fix AT immediately
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85214
Bug ID: 85214
Summary: ICE on valid C++17 code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in
tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14562
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57728
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Jens, see the discussion in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22763
Jason, should this be closed as FIXED for 6.3 and up? I believe what Jens
observes is the intended behaviour of GCC and Clang now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57728
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jlink at drw dot com
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85213
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85213
Bug ID: 85213
Summary: -fsanitize=undefined internal compiler error: in
fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2402
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85212
Bug ID: 85212
Summary: Parallelizable loop isn't unrolled [regression bug?]
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81575
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|8.0 |7.3.0
--- Comment #7 from Volker Reich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85185
Andrew Waterman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84221
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 19:59:20 2018
New Revision: 259106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84221
* g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-32.C: Test explicit specialization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80026
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80026
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Apr 4 19:57:33 2018
New Revision: 259105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/80026
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85172
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85172
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 4 19:55:56 2018
New Revision: 259104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR inline-asm/85172
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_builtin_functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84878
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84878
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Apr 4 19:51:32 2018
New Revision: 259103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2018-04-04 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This behaviour is target-dependent. If the target defines NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C
then it doesn't happen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85146
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It seems to have been fixed in 6.3.0
tmp$ ~/gcc/6.2.0/bin/g++ -E t.cc -o t.ii
tmp$ ~/gcc/6.2.0/bin/g++ -E x.cc -o x.ii
tmp$ ~/gcc/6.2.0/bin/g++ t.ii x.ii
/tmp/ccdXPlNS.o: In function `copy(std::unordered_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211
Bug ID: 85211
Summary: -isystem automatically adds extern "C" to includes
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85146
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 4 19:34:18 2018
New Revision: 259101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85146
* cp-tree.h (calculate_bases, calculate_direc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85210
Bug ID: 85210
Summary: ICE with broken structured binding in template
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85200
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85209
Bug ID: 85209
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with lambda and structured binding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85006
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 19:19:34 2018
New Revision: 259100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259100&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85006 - -fconcepts ICE with A return type
* pt.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85208
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84221
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 19:10:32 2018
New Revision: 259098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259098&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84221 - bogus -Wunused with attribute and template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85200
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 19:10:38 2018
New Revision: 259099
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259099&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85200 - ICE with constexpr if in generic lambda.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84878
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> ICEs on GCC 7 but not with GCC 6.
Backport to GCC 7 bootstraps and regtests with no regressions. Waiting for
approval to commit it to the GCC 7 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85208
Bug ID: 85208
Summary: ICE with #pragma weak and structured binding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85006
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85200
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632
Matt Godbolt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85207
Bug ID: 85207
Summary: Documentation says that -Qn is the default but looks
like -Qy is the default
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85161
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84221
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85203
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Apr 4 17:31:46 2018
New Revision: 259097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR85203: cmse_nonsecure_caller returns wrong result
__b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83402
--- Comment #8 from Paul Clarke ---
(In reply to Steven Munroe from comment #7)
> Please try the same test with AT11 gcc7. I know I hit this!
voila!
$ /opt/at11.0/bin/gcc -o 83402 83402.c -DNO_WARN_X86_INTRINSICS -Wall
-mcpu=power8 -O3
In file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85161
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 4 17:18:14 2018
New Revision: 259096
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259096&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/85161
* elf.c (elf_zlib_fetch): Fix up predefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yeah, but it is too late to make GCC 8. Do you want to do the patch for GCC 9?
Ideally it goes into binutils, first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85200
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85205
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Mijzelf from comment #0)
> args.data[ i ].var1 = i;
This is undefined behaviour when i>0 because the array only has one element.
It's irrelevant that the union has additional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85180
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another testcase running into this.
char *bar (void);
__INTPTR_TYPE__ baz (void);
void
foo (__INTPTR_TYPE__ *q)
{
char *p = bar ();
__INTPTR_TYPE__ a = baz ();
__INTPTR_TYPE__ b = baz ();
int i = 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85141
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85148
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85118
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 16:46:00 2018
New Revision: 259094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85118 - wrong error with generic lambda and std::bind.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85148
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 16:45:53 2018
New Revision: 259093
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259093&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85148 - ICE with 'this' in array NSDMI.
* tree.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
--- Comment #34 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #33)
> Probably impossible to fix without breaking the ABI again, but there should
> have been two __throw_ios_failure entries (and callers be "versioned" as
> well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85118
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 16:42:44 2018
New Revision: 259090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85118 - wrong error with generic lambda and std::bind.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85133
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 16:42:50 2018
New Revision: 259091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85133 - ICE with missing concept initializer.
* de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85135
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 16:42:55 2018
New Revision: 259092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85135 - ICE with omitted template arguments.
* dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85148
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 4 16:42:33 2018
New Revision: 259088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85148 - ICE with 'this' in array NSDMI.
* tree.c (
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
