https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67336
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476
Bug ID: 84476
Summary: [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed
through pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70186
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18206
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84475
Bug ID: 84475
Summary: pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on
riscv-linux
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Feb 20 04:05:38 2018
New Revision: 257837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-19 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84429
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84429
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 20 03:39:37 2018
New Revision: 257836
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257836&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84429 - ICE capturing VLA.
* lambda.c (build_captu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61491
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
--- Comment #17 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #16)
> The change is installed and it's now the default on hppa-linux. This is
> an ABI change
> and I don't plan to change the default on 32-bit hpux.
so... can this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84474
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Summary|[gcc 8] Inconsis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84474
Bug ID: 84474
Summary: Unexpected -Wstringop-truncation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83955
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 19 22:09:13 2018
New Revision: 257827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83344
PR fortran/83975
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 19 22:09:13 2018
New Revision: 257827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83344
PR fortran/8397
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, the conditional assignment is eliminated in favor of the one in the next
basic block. Considering the first statement in the next basic block (rather
than just the current one) is also the solution I'm l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
--- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler ---
Ok there maybe a problem with the optimizer as you describe it in bug 84470.
However why does variant 3 from comment #0 yields a warning too ?
if (iCString)
{
strncpy(_cstring, iCString, 3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84470
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84146
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 19 21:58:04 2018
New Revision: 257826
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257826&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84146
* reg-notes.def (REG_CALL_ARG_LOCATION): N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84473
Bug ID: 84473
Summary: FAIL: libgomp.c++/member-5.C execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84472
Bug ID: 84472
Summary: Missing finalization and memory leak
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84471
Bug ID: 84471
Summary: Instruction reordering happens in lambdas even with
-O0
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84470
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
I can't see the difference between the 2 cases?
clang gives for both:
warning: comparison of array 'p->a' equal to a null pointer is always false
[-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84470
Bug ID: 84470
Summary: test for address of member being null not eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79096
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |9.0
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Nothing, it never reaches memset before it exits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371
--- Comment #3 from Will Schmidt ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #1)
> In addition to trunk this also fails with gcc 7
Yup.
There was/is an ice in one of the builtins-3.* tests that should be better now
, per https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84378
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #14)
> Fixed (finally).
>
> Closing.
Thanks Thomas!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83935
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey ---
For Rust I ended up following the letter of the standard, so I'm going
to follow this in the gdb patches as well. That said, gdb can be adapted
to work with either approach, so it's not strictly necessary to ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 19 19:36:41 2018
New Revision: 257822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257822&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/8
* builtins.c (builtin_mathfn_code): Don't che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84463
--- Comment #1 from sergey.ignatchenko at ithare dot com ---
oops, forgot to mention command line:
g++ -std=c++1z -lstdc++ -Werror ../chachatest.cpp
where chachatest.cpp is provided in "CODE" section above
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84452
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |9.0
--- Comment #38 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84448
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 19 19:16:26 2018
New Revision: 257821
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257821&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84448
* parser.c (cp_parser_binary_expression): For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84430
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 19 19:12:14 2018
New Revision: 257820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84430
* constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Roberts ---
Correct, it does not show native in the list of valid options presented to the
user.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84452
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:58:13 2018
New Revision: 257819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/84452
* tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
--- Comment #16 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
The change is installed and it's now the default on hppa-linux. This is
an ABI change
and I don't plan to change the default on 32-bit hpux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:49:21 2018
New Revision: 257818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257818&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79064
* g++.dg/template/overload15.C (f): Use 0u -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356
--- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I'd expect any complete patch default to -fno-math-errno to add
-fmath-errno to all tests relating to errno setting by libm functions (so
that patch was incomplete for lack of test updates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989
--- Comment #19 from Wilco ---
(In reply to sudi from comment #17)
> Since this looks like a pretty invasive problem, according to my discussions
> with Wilco and Kyrill, I think I will try to propose a smaller, but
> temporary fix using the ?s a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The testcase in comment 1 originally made three calls to _ZN4BaseC2Ev until
r238688 when it made two, and then only one call after r238689 (the fix for PR
66617).
So it looks like the reason it's still w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
--- Comment #23 from Martin Liška ---
> One side issue that is not solved at all by the patch is
> -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope, since that still leads to extreme stack
> usage in the kernel. The problem here is that it forces many local va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love ---
Will:
Here is the bug report I just got from Peter. From our sametime
conversation sounds like you have addressed these in a recent update.
Take a look, may be that Peter needs to update his tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82183
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81272
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82183
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:30:31 2018
New Revision: 257817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Put pass_sancov_O0 before pass_lower_switch with -O0 (PR sanitizer/82183).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82491
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:29:52 2018
New Revision: 257816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ubsan in gimple-fold.c (PR tree-optimization/82491).
2018-02-19 Mart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81272
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:29:20 2018
New Revision: 257815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not use bit and for conjunction of predicates (PR c/81272).
2018-02-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
Bug 25829 depends on bug 35339, which changed state.
Bug 35339 Summary: Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:21:45 2018
New Revision: 257814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/35339
* fronten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 19 18:21:45 2018
New Revision: 257814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/35339
* fronten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #20 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19)
> In any case, having a fast and at least for double precise exp10 in glibc
> would be also beneficial, then this issue would go away at least on glibc
> targets.
Yes, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #17)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> > Created attachment 43464 [details]
> > gcc8-pr82004.patch
> >
> > Thus, does this fix the miscompare? I'll bootstrap/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I have submitted a patch some time ago at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00939.html
Mike asked for some changes and I got distracted before being able to fulfill
the requests.
I can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #61
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #17 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Created attachment 43464 [details]
> gcc8-pr82004.patch
>
> Thus, does this fix the miscompare? I'll bootstrap/regtest it on
> x86_64-linux and i686-linux, but don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84443
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergio at serjux dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Guskov ---
Oh wow, that was unexpected!
Will test and report back ASAP.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #62 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Feb 19 17:02:38 2018
New Revision: 257811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81797 Add .NOTPARALLEL to include/Makefile for darwin
Back
failures4
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 22
# of unsupported tests 6
/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.e2kXrnqZV0/gcc-8.0.0/gcc-8.0.0/gcc/gnatmake version
8.0.1 20180219 (experimental) [trunk revision 257803]
Improved by 11 tests which PASS.
acats tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If glibc implements a faster exp10/exp10f, we could do what I've done for
PR84309 and expand pow (10, x) as exp10 (x) and pow (C, x) where C is pow (10,
N) for integral N as exp10 (log10 (C) * x).
Even if it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81272
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Confirmed, it's not consistent. Let me fix that.
Seven months later, it seems to me to be still not fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84460
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84460
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Feb 19 16:28:39 2018
New Revision: 257810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-16 Sebastian Peryt
PR target/84460
* gcc.target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #16 from itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: itsimbal
Date: Mon Feb 19 16:25:49 2018
New Revision: 257809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84450
--- Comment #1 from Steven Noonan ---
Sorry for the comment spam, but...
I think DMARC/DKIM caused the notification for this bug to drop on the floor,
as I saw a DMARC report for my domain saying 65 messages on *@gnu.org were
rejected because th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-02-19 11:17 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Does HPUX provide _exit() in instead?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84446
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
... well, I must add the diagnostic would be much more terse and similar to,
eg, clang's.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Does HPUX provide _exit() in instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84446
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
