https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #20 from Wilco <wilco at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > In any case, having a fast and at least for double precise exp10 in glibc > would be also beneficial, then this issue would go away at least on glibc > targets. Yes, indeed. The key question is how do we know we are linking with GLIBC (including from Fortran, where there are no headers)?
