https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84399
Bug ID: 84399
Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84389
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84398
Bug ID: 84398
Summary: missing -Wstringop-truncation on strncpy into VLA and
dynamically allocated arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84391
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Breakpoint 1, check_conflict (attr=attr@entry=0x203caec38,
> name=0x203c22430 "_deallocate", where=where@entry=0x203caec78)
> at ../../gcc/gcc/fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84397
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84397
Bug ID: 84397
Summary: missing -Wstringop-truncation on strncpy into a
multidimensional array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83984
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84396
Bug ID: 84396
Summary: missing -Wstringop-truncation with non-nul assignment
to destination
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Carl Love ---
Cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84395
Bug ID: 84395
Summary: -Wstringop-truncation where -Wstringop-overflow is
expected
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83698
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83698
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Feb 14 23:22:15 2018
New Revision: 257676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83698 - bogus offset in -Wrestrict messages for strca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Neil Carlson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
Ah, testing my patch, we're getting duplicate named patterns. I'll have to
think about this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67613
Bug 67613 depends on bug 52277, which changed state.
Bug 52277 Summary: spell corrector for misspelled identifiers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> > Implementation of Levenshtein distance (in C++) committed to trunk as
> > r230285; currently we offer hints for mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #43417|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
Bug ID: 84394
Summary: compiler error when using modules with derived types
in block data subprograms
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84108
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84108
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Feb 14 22:02:43 2018
New Revision: 257674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/84108 - incorrect -Wattributes warning for packed/aligned
co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84385
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug 84094 depends on bug 84385, which changed state.
Bug 84385 Summary: [F03] Reject invalid SELECT TYPE selector
(allocate_with_source_22.f03)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84385
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84385
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Feb 14 21:46:59 2018
New Revision: 257673
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257673&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-14 Janus Weil
PR fortran/84385
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83984
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Wed Feb 14 21:13:26 2018
New Revision: 257672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83984
* config/pa/pa.md: Load address of P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84393
Bug ID: 84393
Summary: "make install" omits gfortran modules, following
cross-native build
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84392
Bug ID: 84392
Summary: test case gcc.dg/graphite/uns-interchange-9.c and 3
others fail on power9
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #10)
> Jakub had it correct in comment #8.
Yeah, I have no idea how I got that completely wrong notion. Sorry all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84391
Bug ID: 84391
Summary: External specs file misinterpreted, unless read twice
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> So should this ideally read:
> return type ‘T’ {aka ‘class std::tuple’} is incomplete
> to express both the name the code used, and the underlying type?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
As I understand it, "using" is a more modern form of typedef (e.g. with
template support).
So should this ideally read:
return type ‘T’ {aka ‘class std::tuple’} is incomplete
to express both the name the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Another one: std::make_tuple
...and so on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82939
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> It works when I use a previous version of gcc I built myself though. (8.0
> from 20170525)
Regardless of the fact that I was able to work around this bug, I'm st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Feb 14 20:03:21 2018
New Revision: 257671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from GCC 7 branch
2018-02-14 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Feb 14 19:56:25 2018
New Revision: 257670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257670&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84390
* gcc.target/powerpc/vsxcopy.c: Also mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
Bug ID: 84390
Summary: test case gcc.target/powerpc/vsxcopy.c fails for gcc 7
and gcc 6 on power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
Created attachment 43417
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43417&action=edit
Proposed patch to merge altivec patterns.
Hi Kaushik,
Can you see if the following unetsted patch fixes your I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84369
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also fails with gcc 7 and gcc 6 on power9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84385
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84389
Bug ID: 84389
Summary: Defined output: unexpected compiler error with the use
of ":" edit descriptor
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84388
Bug ID: 84388
Summary: test case
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-mult-int128-
p9.c fails on power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
Bug ID: 84387
Summary: Defined output does not work for a derived type that
has no components
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173
--- Comment #6 from Mike Gulick ---
(In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #5)
> Seeing this also with GCC 7.3. Will try proposed patches
Latest version of patch and test:
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00557.html
Test: h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84372
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84372
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84372
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Feb 14 18:48:53 2018
New Revision: 257667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Back port from mainline
2018-02-13 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 43416
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43416&action=edit
patch
Patch awaiting review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||P at draigBrady dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84386
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84386
Bug ID: 84386
Summary: Implicitly declared variables in BLOCK have scope of
including program unit
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70401
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84385
Bug ID: 84385
Summary: [F03] Reject invalid SELECT TYPE selector
(allocate_with_source_22.f03)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Feb 14 17:59:29 2018
New Revision: 257666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-02-14 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84350
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84372
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84372
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In addition to trunk this also fails with gcc 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84218
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
Some working variants/extentions with substring "x(i:i)" :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer :: i
character(3) :: x
data (x(i:i), i=1,3) /'a', 'b', 'c'/
print *, x
end
$ gfortran-8-20180211 z2.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Bug ID: 84384
Summary: new test case
gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-4-int128-runnable.c fails
on power7
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43415
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43415&action=edit
gcc8-pr84383.patch
Untested fix.
BTW, the code is still problematic, e.g. the:
if (code == ARRAY_REF ||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52899
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Bug ID: 84383
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_diag_stxncpy_trunc
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62234
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84382
Bug ID: 84382
Summary: add command-line options -std=gnu2003 and -std=gnu2008
for gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Bug ID: 84381
Summary: replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran
testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84220
--- Comment #2 from Will Schmidt ---
Author: willschm
Date: Wed Feb 14 15:32:02 2018
New Revision: 257662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-02-14 Will Schmidt
PR target/84220
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
(T ...) [with T = {int}]'
main.cpp:13:10: required from here
main.cpp:8:17: error: use of 'bar' before deduction of 'auto'
sink(bar(v, T{}) ...);
~~~^~~~
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.1 20180214 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Fou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Feb 14 15:17:04 2018
New Revision: 257661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Back port from mainline
2018-02-13 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84288
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> * If DejaGnu is installed into a non-system directory, dejagnu.h isn't found
> compiling the tests. I've hacked around this by hardcoding a matching -I
> option in jit.exp.
I be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84239
igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 84239, which changed state.
Bug 84239 Summary: Reimplement rdssp[d|q] and incssp[d|q] CET intrinsics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84239
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84380
Bug ID: 84380
Summary: No GTY handling for language-specific target files
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84239
--- Comment #1 from itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: itsimbal
Date: Wed Feb 14 15:06:21 2018
New Revision: 257660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reimplement CET intrinsics for rdssp/incssp insn.
Introdu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84379
Bug ID: 84379
Summary: Problems with sol2.c GTY handling
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84197
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84357
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84100
--- Comment #11 from Chris Hall ---
FWIW: __attribute__((aligned(32))) works nicely for functions.
Generally there is little to be gained from aligning all loops/jumps/labels in
a given function or group of functions.
Further, when code alignm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84368
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Buch ---
I'm on git commit a5283f322810189a156a0fb080bf6d65e6f7970e which should be
R257627.
I used:
$ git svn find-rev $(git log --max-count 1 --pretty=format:%H)
Migrating from a git-svn v1 layout...
Data from a
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo