https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3) > > Implementation of Levenshtein distance (in C++) committed to trunk as > > r230285; currently we offer hints for misspelled command-line options (PR > > 67613), and in the C FE for misspelled fields. > > > > There's plenty more that could be implemented; see: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg01090.html > > for some other implementation ideas. > > I'm thinking it'd make sense to close this bug, since the basic spell > corrector is in, and open separate issues for the "plenty more that could be > implemented" so they can be focused on individually Or, if opening separate issues, maybe this one could actually stay open and become a meta-bug for all the other spell checker issues
