https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83090
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber ---
I was able to build GCC ab053afeec0450e64568a7a0d50d0e9a5ece2787 (20180116).
gnu
Configured with: ../gcc_dev/configure --prefix=/home/abc/gcc_dev_bin
--disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180116 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80188
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to nik from comment #3)
> Created attachment 42372 [details]
> Proposed Fix Send to the GCC-Patches List
Link to the mailing list archives showing where/when this was sent to
gcc-patches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77704
--- Comment #5 from Boris Kolpackov ---
For anyone interested, here is the workaround we came up with:
// A data race happens in the libstdc++ (as of GCC 7.2) implementation of the
// ctype::narrow() function (bug #77704). The issue is easily tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83875
--- Comment #3 from Roland Schulz ---
Instead of adding (/modifying) the goal could also be achieved by allowing to
call a target+constexpr function from a target_clone function. Currently this
gives: "error: call to non-constexpr function" (exam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83883
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83911
Bug ID: 83911
Summary: ICE with target attribute on constructor in
gimplify_expr at gimplify.c:11321
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83883
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Again possibly callee-copy handling exposes more dead stores. Is there a
> dg-effective target for that "feature"?
Because of these issues, I just changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83883
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 43158
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43158&action=edit
.s file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83883
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 43157
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43157&action=edit
Tree dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83883
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 43156
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43156&action=edit
Tree dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83909
--- Comment #2 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Note most folks run make check with -k also it won't even make a difference
> there either.
The patch seems to do the same thing for me when I run mak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83910
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
We only need CET property in libgcc and libstdc++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83910
Bug ID: 83910
Summary: Add --enable-cet-property
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 16 23:05:39 2018
New Revision: 256765
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256765&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83714 - ICE checking return in template.
* typeck.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83909
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note most folks run make check with -k also it won't even make a difference
there either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83909
Bug ID: 83909
Summary: Make doesn't report TCL errors in summary
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83864
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83822
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Jan 16 21:42:13 2018
New Revision: 256761
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256761&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-16 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/80481
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83863
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82240
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
*** Bug 83863 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83908
Bug ID: 83908
Summary: -fvisibility=hidden not setting the visibility of the
resolver/ifunc created for attribute target
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf ---
Attempting to "fix" the negative length issue with
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c (revision 256671)
+++ gcc/fortran/expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf ---
For the case 3a, setting a breakpoint at expr.c:1684, I get:
(gdb) l
1679 length = end - start + 1;
1680
1681 chr = (*newp)->value.character.string = gfc_get_wide_string (length +
1);
1682 (*n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77734
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 16 20:48:43 2018
New Revision: 256757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/77734
* gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-1.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77734
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 16 20:48:05 2018
New Revision: 256756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/77734
* gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-1.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #28 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #27)
> Note that this is deliberately left as-is because the target advertises
> (cheap) support for horizontal reduction. The vectorizer simply generates
> a single
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83839
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrewm.roberts at sky dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83903
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83698
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82666
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83907
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83907
Bug ID: 83907
Summary: missing strlen optimization for non-zero memset
followed by a nul byte store
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Does not reproduce with powerpc64-linux-gcc -m32 (not on trunk and
not on current 7).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906
Bug ID: 83906
Summary: [8 Regression] Random FAIL:
libstdc++-prettyprinters/80276.cc whatis p4
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83862
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83905
Bug ID: 83905
Summary: ix86_expand_epilogue modifies the copy of
cfun->machine->frame
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83904
Bug ID: 83904
Summary: gfortran.dg allocatable_function_1 failures
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83902
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code is
extern "C" void *memset(void *, int, unsigned long);
template class b {
void c() { memset(4, 0, 4 * a * sizeof(float)); }
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83903
Bug ID: 83903
Summary: gcc 8.0.0 20180114 fails to bootstrap on Darwin
x86_64, undeclared ASM_OUTPUT_DEF
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83902
Bug ID: 83902
Summary: ice in decompose, at wide-int.h:932
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83896
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83896
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 Regression] ice in |[8 Regression] ice in
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83900
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49678
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58424
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49678
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83875
--- Comment #2 from Roland Schulz ---
The main problem is that it already gets resolved in the preprocessor stage.
Thus if you have:
__attribute__((target_clones("avx","default")))
void foo(){
#if __AVX__
...
#endif
}
, it doesn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83901
Bug ID: 83901
Summary: [8 Regresion] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:2402
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83899
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||83819
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83900
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Working variants :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: a(3,2) = 1
real :: b(2,3) = 2
print *, matmul(a, b)
end
$ cat z3.f90
program p
integer :: a(3,2) = 1
real :: b(2,3) = 2
p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83900
Bug ID: 83900
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_matmul, at
fortran/simplify.c:4593
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83899
Bug ID: 83899
Summary: missing strlen optimization for constant string plus
offset
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83898
Bug ID: 83898
Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at
fortran/trans-array.c:7181
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83898
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
While this and other variants work :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
associate (x => [1])
print *, x
end associate
end
$ gfortran-8-20180114 z2.f90 -static-libgfortran
$ a.out
1
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83874
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #2 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #4 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83287
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #41 from Sven ---
(In reply to Alexey Salmin from comment #39)
> .. when the packed attribute is preserved in the pointer.
What do you mean by that? GCC documentation explicitly forbids to use the
packed attribute for anything but st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43871
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83883
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83424
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83896
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83896
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.2.1 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83897
Bug ID: 83897
Summary: [8 Regression] Useless __builtin_unreachable ()
emitted by the C++ FE
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82694
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83739
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79405
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83424
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jan 16 16:30:43 2018
New Revision: 256752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rtlanal: dead_or_set_regno_p should handle CLOBBER (PR83424)
In PR8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78972
--- Comment #14 from Maxim Egorushkin ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #13)
> Folks where unhappy with various aspects of that patch. Bernd left Red Hat
> shortly thereafter and the patch hasn't been updated since his departure.
I h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11)
>
> Smells odd indeed. Can you try building with
> --enable-valgrind-annotations and run valgrind on the thing? My theory
> would still be a wild write somewh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #12)
> I was able to reduce it somewhat. However, I'd be surprised if it does not
> reproduce the error on some other system.
I meant: I'd be surprised if it does reproduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
--- Comment #12 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 43152
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43152&action=edit
preprocessed c++ source
I was able to reduce it somewhat. However, I'd be surprised if it does not
reproduce the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83424
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jan 16 16:20:10 2018
New Revision: 256750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rtlanal: dead_or_set_regno_p should handle CLOBBER (PR83424)
In PR8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758
boger at us dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boger at us dot ibm.com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78972
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Folks where unhappy with various aspects of that patch. Bernd left Red Hat
shortly thereafter and the patch hasn't been updated since his departure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61240
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is a regression, so it isn't too late yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61240
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
I've been meaning to address this PR (for too long, apparently), but it seems
it's too late for GCC 8 now. If you want, you can take it. If not, hopefully
I'll get to it for GCC 9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78972
Maxim Egorushkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxim.yegorushkin at gmail dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61240
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Marek, are you still on the hook to remove this premature optimization from the
FE and let it be folded in c_fully_fold or later?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83896
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83834
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] FAIL:|[6/7 Regression] FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #40 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alexey Salmin from comment #39)
> Thank you, this patch works for me.
>
> Gives a warning in the attached test case, but still allows to take an
> addre of a packed struct members when the packed att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83887
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83895
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83590
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 16 15:18:24 2018
New Revision: 256748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/83590
* gimplify.c (gimplify_one_sizepos): For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83857
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83860
--- Comment #2 from Bruno Manganelli ---
Just to clarify, it still segfaults when using clang++ with libstdc++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
