https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 12, 2017 12:51:35 AM GMT+01:00, law at redhat dot com
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
>
>Jeffrey A. Law changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82398
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Andrey, any progress on this?
Sorry, I have somehow missed this PR. The second hunk of Alexander's patch
looks fine. In the first I would rather rewrite t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83388
Bug ID: 83388
Summary: reference statement index not found error with
-fsanitize=null
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83387
Bug ID: 83387
Summary: PowerPC64 + Ada + RTEMS: Infinite loops in do_reload()
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83206
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Roberts ---
The patch in in latest snapshot is working ok on Raspberry Pi Zero. And
-help=target now returns:
/usr/local/gcc/bin/gcc -march=native -mcpu=native -mfpu=auto -Q --help=target |
grep "march\|mcpu\|mfpu"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83386
Bug ID: 83386
Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O1
-floop-nest-optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83385
Bug ID: 83385
Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O1
-floop-nest-optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83384
Bug ID: 83384
Summary: Optimize heap allocation as stack allocation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83311
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=818
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83311
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83383
Bug ID: 83383
Summary: Wrong code with a bunch of type conversion and ternary
operators
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83382
Bug ID: 83382
Summary: UBSAN tiggers false-positive warning
[-Werror=uninitialized]
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82050
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Dec 12 01:31:30 2017
New Revision: 255563
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255563&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Expensive selftests: torture testing for fix-it boundary conditions (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83376
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83381
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] gcc|gcc bootstrap fails due to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Dec 11 23:21:55 2017
New Revision: 27
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=27&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81544 - attribute noreturn and warn_unused_result on the same functio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83381
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83381
Bug ID: 83381
Summary: New test cases gfortran.dg/minval_char* and
gfortran.dg/maxval_char* fail
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83131
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Dec 11 22:36:07 2017
New Revision: 24
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=24&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR80693] drop value of parallel SETs dropped by combine
When combine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81019
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Dec 11 22:36:07 2017
New Revision: 24
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=24&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR80693] drop value of parallel SETs dropped by combine
When combine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80693
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Dec 11 22:36:07 2017
New Revision: 24
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=24&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR80693] drop value of parallel SETs dropped by combine
When combine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21182
--- Comment #27 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So for gcc-8.
UNAIL_REGS -O3 41 stack references
UNAIL_REGS -O2 41 stack referenecs
DNAIL_REGS -O3 3 stack references
DNAIL_REGS -O2 3 stack references
In the DNAIL_REGS case I think all three refe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83380
Bug ID: 83380
Summary: disk full while writing LTO files leads to ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
I lowered to N = 250 and still fails with a good margin.
On 12/11/2017 09:58 PM, Michele Pezzutti wrote:
I apologize as I am unable to run the test suite in its full form.
Nevertheless, I locally tested the following patch for the test suite:
*26_numerics/random/poisson_distribution/opera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Seems it's wrong at least to access value.character.length if the expression
isn't a constant? So,
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index d1a2368..017b9f7 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83332
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Proposed patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00656.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82211
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83361
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Dec 11 21:23:08 2017
New Revision: 20
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
ifcvt: Call fixup_partitions (PR83361)
After converting a condition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83355
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen ---
patch checked in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82742
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
I apologize as I am unable to run the test suitein its full form.
Nevertheless, I locally tested the following patch for the test suite:
*26_numerics/random/poisson_distribution/operators/values.cc
Add additional test to cover bin 'floor(mu) + 1'
by compiling locally values.cc and running i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83336
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: adding some automated test coverage for the existing code:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00646.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #10 from Alan Griffiths ---
It took me some time and effort to reproduce too. :(
Building in my normal development environments showed no problems. And I've yet
to reproduce on Ubuntu (although the builders we use fail building for 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can't reproduce it either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Thanks. However, I still cannot reproduce.
Perhaps someone who has access to Red Hat 7.2.1-2 has more luck.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #7 from Alan Griffiths ---
cd
/builddir/build/BUILD/mir-5500595810c28c150a3bd9edf19b392c2aeab932/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/src/server/frontend/wayland
&& /usr/bin/c++ -DLOG_NDEBUG=1 -DMESA_EGL_NO_X11_HEADERS
-DMIR_DRMMODEADDFB_HAS_CONS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83312
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Still cannot reproduce. Please post the full gcc invocation. Add -v to it and
please post the full output, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #5 from Alan Griffiths ---
It isn't clear why, but the problem seems to be provoked by this function:
int mf::WaylandConnector::client_socket_fd() const
{
enum { server, client, size };
int socket_fd[size];
if (socketpai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83379
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81959
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Dec 11 18:54:55 2017
New Revision: 255545
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255545&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-12-11 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
You *really* don't want to do this with a match.pd pattern. Recovering the
arith-with-overflow optimizations is virtually impossible in the general case.
All that really needs to be done here is generaliz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67751
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83366
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83379
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83379
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 11 17:57:38 2017
New Revision: 255543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255543&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/83379
* gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
Alan Griffiths changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42841|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83345
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> I think that's the expected behaviour in C++17. The return statement in the
> conversion operator no longer constructs an object in C++17, it calls the
> convers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82849
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53347
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53110
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 11 17:39:07 2017
New Revision: 255542
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255542&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/45689
* simplif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83379
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83379
Bug ID: 83379
Summary: Intermittent failure of min/maxval_char*.f90 test
cases
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44474
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33349
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914
Bug 31914 depends on bug 30997, which changed state.
Bug 30997 Summary: FRE does not simplify comparisons in COND_EXPRs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30997
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30997
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29775
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83378
Bug ID: 83378
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr54970.c xpass
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #13 from Andrey Guskov ---
The revision was wrong, it`s today`s build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Guskov ---
Well, that was faster than I expected.
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=20171211/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83369
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83377
Bug ID: 83377
Summary: Missed optimization (x86): Bit operations should be
converted to arithmetic
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82371
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83376
Bug ID: 83376
Summary: ICE in LTO streamer
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014
--- Comment #5 from cgw at alum dot mit.edu ---
Why not?
Our use case is building a Python module (an .so file loaded by Python) which
wraps some Fortran code.
We would like to reduce the external dependencies that this module has. There
have b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83375
--- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen ---
Actually -flto-partition=max
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19986
Bug 19986 depends on bug 25529, which changed state.
Bug 25529 Summary: (unsigned * 2)/2 is not changed into unsigned &0x7FFF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25529
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25529
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78450
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83375
Bug ID: 83375
Summary: partitioner partitions static arrays with label
references
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83373
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83374
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #2 from Alan Griffiths ---
Created attachment 42841
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42841&action=edit
Preprocessed source
So far, I've only seen the error on "builders" where I don't have access (i.e.
I've so far
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82398
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19721
Bug 19721 depends on bug 19790, which changed state.
Bug 19790 Summary: equality not noticed when signedness differs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19790
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19790
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83364
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83363
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83374
Bug ID: 83374
Summary: Bad std::is_standard_layout with two base class
subobjects of the same type
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83345
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Guskov ---
Understood. Going to report back tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83355
--- Comment #2 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ak
Date: Mon Dec 11 16:13:53 2017
New Revision: 255540
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255540&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix stack overflow with autofdo (PR83355)
g++.dg/bprob* is failing cu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83373
Bug ID: 83373
Summary: False positive reported by -Wstringop-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
Bug ID: 83372
Summary: Compiler segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #12 from James Clarke ---
> What is the value of TIOCGWINSZ on SH?
It's 0x80087468, which is the expansion of _IOR('t', 104, struct winsize) (sh4
uses the default encoding for _IOC; also for some reason the value is
hard-coded in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83332
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
As far as I know libbacktrace and libgo use the same criteria for whether they
are built or not. Why is libbacktrace not being built for m4-fpu? What is
preventing that build from occurring?
What is th
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
