https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Created attachment 42567 [details]
> gcc8-pr82916.patch
>
> Untested fix.
As you figured ref_maybe_used_by_stmt and stmt_clobbers_ref_p are supposed
to be read
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82929
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82930
Bug ID: 82930
Summary: [C++17/AArch64] ICE: in is_normal_capture_proxy, at
cp/lambda.c:288 with structured binding in a lambda
function with auto typed arguments
Product: gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82929
Bug ID: 82929
Summary: [8 regression] r254579 causes ICE: tree check:
expected ssa_name, have array_ref in has_single_use,
at ssa-iterators.h:400
Product: gcc
Ver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42571
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42571&action=edit
somewhat reduced testcase
Seen with current glibc "make check", gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
EoD changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||EoD at xmw dot de
--- Comment #20 from EoD ---
(I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82927
Bug ID: 82927
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in verify_flow_info building SH
glibc
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82913
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 9 23:58:51 2017
New Revision: 254614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254614&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/82913
* compare-elim.c (try_merge_comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81351
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82914
--- Comment #4 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> You are not using aligned on a 'struct or struct member' but on the variable
> in all but (b).
If that's the intent, then GCC is mishandling the first example I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82926
--- Comment #3 from EoD ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> The testcase violates redzone.
>
> Either add rsp to the list of clobbered registers, or compile with
> -fno-red-zone.
>
> OTOH, you should just include and use __cpuid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82926
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82895
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Arjen Markus from comment #4)
> It was precisely this sort of issues that led me to write this small sample
> program. And I realised this morning, that indeed the host variables need to
> be avo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82926
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The testcase violates redzone.
Either add rsp to the list of clobbered registers, or compile with
-fno-red-zone.
OTOH, you should just include and use __cpuid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82333
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Note the checkin message in note 2 was for a private branch, that included
other patches that have been submitted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82333
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon ---
I confirm that charlen_15 now compiles & executes OK for me.
charlen_03 and charlen_10 have been removed, so they no longer fail :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82925
Bug ID: 82925
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp101.c fails starting
with r254379
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82926
Bug ID: 82926
Summary: x86_64 inline assembly with push/pop produces buggy
code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
URL: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99066
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82919
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82924
Bug ID: 82924
Summary: gcc gives no warning for comparing unsigned integer <
0 even with -Wextra enabled
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82333
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Nov 9 20:01:29 2017
New Revision: 254607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254607&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix pr 82333
Added:
branches/ibm/ieee/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/
../gcc/fortran/parse.c:3773
> 0x6e5bb3 parse_progunit
> ../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:5615
> 0x6e71a4 gfc_parse_file()
> ../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6124
> 0x72b182 gfc_be_parse_file
> ../../gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:202
With up to date trunk (GNU Fortran (GCC) 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78619
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Nov 9 19:12:41 2017
New Revision: 254605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254605&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-09 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/78619
* check.c (same_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Guskov ---
No, the patch you mentioned does not fix the issue.
The output I get is listed here:
.file "fake.c"
.text
.Ltext0:
.p2align 4,,15
.globl test_aligned_reading_s2
.ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Nov 9 18:45:29 2017
New Revision: 254604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254604&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-09 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78814
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82903
--- Comment #3 from Sudakshina Das ---
Confirmed on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
>
> > --cut here--
> > struct s { char a; char b; char c; char d; };
> >
> > void foo (struct s *__restrict a, struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
Bug ID: 82923
Summary: Automatic allocation of deferred length character
using function result
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
Bug ID: 82922
Summary: Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R
style is obsolescent
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82921
Bug ID: 82921
Summary: libsanitizer build failure on darwin10 (Snow Leopard)
due to missing VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82920
Bug ID: 82920
Summary: cet test failures on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82919
Bug ID: 82919
Summary: Docs don't mention -Wimplicit-int is enabled in C99
mode
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82918
Bug ID: 82918
Summary: No aliasing is possible on non equal pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: alias, missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
What the code does is when seeing the MEM[(struct et_occ *)p_3].of = node_5(D);
store, we go through all current chains (there is exactly one at that point)
and for each chain through all their stmts and do:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> --cut here--
> struct s { char a; char b; char c; char d; };
>
> void foo (struct s *__restrict a, struct s *__restrict b)
> {
> a->a = b->a;
> a->b = b->b;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, reduced testcase for -O2 -fno-tree-dse is like:
struct allocation_pool_list
{
struct allocation_pool_list *next;
};
struct et_node;
struct et_occ
{
struct et_node *of;
struct et_occ *parent, *prev,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147
--- Comment #8 from Felipe Magno de Almeida ---
With GCC 7.2.0 I'm still not seeing the same results as you are. The following
is the assembly result, using the same .cpp file and the same command line:
.section.text._Z3abcv,"ax"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
>
> > > In addition to a merge opportunity, there is a redundant move [*], that
> > > results
> > > in redundant op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82879
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82879
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Nov 9 14:05:14 2017
New Revision: 254582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/82879
* ipa-inline-transform.c (update_noncloned_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82917
Bug ID: 82917
Summary: [8 regression]
27_io/basic_{f,if,of}stream/open/char/path.cc fails
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82844
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Pierre-Marie de Rodat from comment #9)
> I’ve setup an Ubuntu VM, installed libx32 runtime libraries and built with
> “--with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32” + ran the testsuite (“make -C gcc -j8 -k
> che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82902
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82902
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 9 12:22:32 2017
New Revision: 254575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-09 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82902
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82863
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 9 12:19:02 2017
New Revision: 254574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Initialize split_branch_probability (PR target/82863).
2017-11-09 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
../gcc/configure --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-libitm
--disable-libcilkrts --disable-libssp --disable-libgomp --disable-werror
--disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
> --- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > It does by removing the SHT_NULL sect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82914
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It does by removing the SHT_NULL sections. The patch should work - you
> can double-check - it just doesn't handle the "corner case" of more
> than 32000 input sections correctly when rewriting the symbo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, diagnostic
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Both of the remaining testcases now compile for me.
> Probably can close this PR.
With my instrumented gfortran compiler I still see failures similar to the one
reported in comment 2:
pr78746.f90:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82891
--- Comment #4 from Tony E Lewis ---
Thanks very much for your quick work on this.
I agree that changing the standard is a reasonable approach but I also think
that changing the library implementations is a reasonable approach too. Please
may I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82844
--- Comment #9 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
I’ve setup an Ubuntu VM, installed libx32 runtime libraries and built with
“--with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32” + ran the testsuite (“make -C gcc -j8 -k
check-ada”), without reproducing the issues you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82737
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #19)
> I can take a look at the trunk crash, but not till next week. You could try
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00384.html, which I've yet to
> com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82669
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82669
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:27:21 2017
New Revision: 254567
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254567&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove non needed check in bmp_iter_set_init (PR tree-optimization/82669).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82683
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:23:30 2017
New Revision: 254565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-11-01 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82683
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:23:30 2017
New Revision: 254565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-11-01 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:23:30 2017
New Revision: 254565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-11-01 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69567
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:23:30 2017
New Revision: 254565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-11-01 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:21:06 2017
New Revision: 254564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-11-01 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82683
--- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:21:06 2017
New Revision: 254564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-11-01 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69567
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:21:06 2017
New Revision: 254564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-11-01 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Nov 9 10:21:06 2017
New Revision: 254564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-11-01 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
>
> --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> All the store merging changes so far were f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-*-* |powerpc64le-*-*, x86_64-*-*
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
All the store merging changes so far were for the same operations on all the
loads/constant values.
In order to handle something like this, we'd need to best hook in the bswap
machinery, probably start with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82916
Bug ID: 82916
Summary: [8 regression] gcc miscompiled during stagefeedback
(PGO bootstrap)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
>
> --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> > In addition to a merge opportunity, there is a redundant move [*], that
> > results
> > in redundant operation [**]. The whole function could be just:
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 9 09:11:17 2017
New Revision: 254562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254562&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
GCOV: support multiple functions per a line (PR gcov-profile/48463)
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
>
> --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> The cc1 gem from comment #2 actually comes from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82837
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 9 08:54:19 2017
New Revision: 254561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/82837
* dwarf2out.c (const_ok_for_output_1): Reje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The cc1 gem from comment #2 actually comes from libz's deflate.c, function
deflate_stores:
/* Replace the lengths in the dummy stored block with len. */
s->pending_buf[s->pending - 4] = len;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82913
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82915
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82910
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82907
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82908
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
