https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > > In addition to a merge opportunity, there is a redundant move [*], that > > results > > in redundant operation [**]. The whole function could be just: > > > > movw %dx, -4(%rdi,%rsi) > > notl %edx > > movw %dx, -2(%rdi,%rsi) > > or > > xorl $0xffff0000, %edx > movl %edx, -4(%rdi,%rsi) > > ? Yes, even this. It looks that store merging opens many optimization opportunities.