https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558
--- Comment #4 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Mon Oct 16 05:44:03 2017
New Revision: 253776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253776&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-16 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/82558
* in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 63602, which changed state.
Bug 63602 Summary: [5 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O2
-ftree-loop-nest-optimize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63602
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63602
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82472
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
Can this PR be closed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560
Bug ID: 82560
Summary: Temporary object created as a default argument not
destructed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47346
Andrew Schepler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aschepler at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82554
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Ben Longbons from comment #0)
> This is related to #64351 and #63176, for which a totally-bogus fix was
> applied.
See PR 80137
> There is actually a defect in the standard:
Then shouldn't i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_bvector.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_bvector.h
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
if (__last._M_offset != 0)
__fill_bvector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to eric-bugs from comment #9)
> This does not seem like correct behavior to me either. The warning should be
> based on the maximum declared enum value, not the maximum possible value
> held by t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60105
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54090
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54090
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 15 22:29:59 2017
New Revision: 253772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253772&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-15 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/54090
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53574
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Jakub, is this still an issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50943
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157
--- Comment #20 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
i can provide access to DilOS (illumos based platform) build zones on SPARC64
and Intel if needed - just send me email igor at dilos dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ---
> it's a pity to no see some efforts to native SPARC64 support on illumos
> based platform.
GCC is a volunteer project, you are free to contribute or to pay someone to
work on a particular issue. Note that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
--- Comment #7 from Ben Longbons ---
I saw that mailing list post, but it only explains *what*, not *why*.
I never really gave consideration to DWARF, since in my little experience it is
very unportable for a "standard". I suppose I could invest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82559
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82559
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sun Oct 15 19:45:33 2017
New Revision: 253770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/82559
Backport from mainline:
https://golang.org/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758
--- Comment #6 from DIL ---
It is not that I am not willing to, I just do not see an easy way to reduce the
relevant code. For now, I have attached a debugger screenshot (jpg above) to
show you the details of the problem. The segfault occurs when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758
--- Comment #7 from DIL ---
P.S. I do not have GCC-8.0 installed anywhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758
--- Comment #5 from DIL ---
Created attachment 42373
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42373&action=edit
Debugger screenshot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157
--- Comment #18 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
i didn't try 5.5.0 because switched to use 6.4.0 for my userland builds on
sparc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> this bug not fixed for 5.x while 5.x was not closed.
Did you try 5.5.0?
When a problem disappear there are two possibilities:
(1) It has been fixed.
(2) It had been made latent.
The only way to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79446
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39030
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
More than eight years later is there any point to keep this PR opened?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157
Igor Kozhukhov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #16 from Igor Kozhu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157
--- Comment #14 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
it is working with 6.4.0, we can close this issue and will wait when 6.x will
be closed to and close others issues without fixes :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The gcc-5 branch has been closed. Is the problem still present with more recent
versions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53977
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The ICE seems fixed on 7.2.0 and trunk (8.0), probably r243647.
Note that compiling the code in comment 0 with -std=f95 does not trigger the
error
Error: GNU Extension: re-initialization of 'x' at (1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80188
--- Comment #3 from nik ---
Created attachment 42372
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42372&action=edit
Proposed Fix Send to the GCC-Patches List
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82559
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #0)
> see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-7
>
> seen on the gcc-7-branch 20171013, didn't check trunk yet.
> this is at least broken on alpha and s39
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82559
Bug ID: 82559
Summary: [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on at least
alpha, s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79795
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 42371
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42371&action=edit
-fsanitize=undefined output
I have attached the -fsanitize=undefined output prior to the crash.
As you ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558
Bug ID: 82558
Summary: [8 Regression] V8 JavaScript engine segfaults since
r249235
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79864
Bug 79864 depends on bug 79863, which changed state.
Bug 79863 Summary: Assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array
variable leads to access of unallocated memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82372
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82372
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 15 12:00:29 2017
New Revision: 253768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-10-15 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/82372
* fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70455
--- Comment #7 from Vincas Dargis ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Can you file a separate bug with the preprocessed source, I suspect the
> issue there is different from the original issue listed here.
Done:
https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82557
Bug ID: 82557
Summary: Spurious -Wstrict-overflow warning with 32bit GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82555
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556
Bug ID: 82556
Summary: internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at
lra-constraints.c:4307
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
55 matches
Mail list logo
