https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82554
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Ben Longbons from comment #0) > This is related to #64351 and #63176, for which a totally-bogus fix was > applied. See PR 80137 > There is actually a defect in the standard: Then shouldn't it be reported elsewhere? https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#submit_issue
