https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82226
Bug ID: 82226
Summary: previously instantiation of template type breaks
future use
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82225
Bug ID: 82225
Summary: Unexpected nondeterministic "internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault" when gcc is expected to save
either rsp or rbp to allow its use in inline asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79868
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #16 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Ok. I thought you were saying that, with your new patch, putting "sp" in
clobbers would *always* force DRAP, even in cases where the function doesn't
need realignment.
If you're *not* saying that, then it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #14)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #12)
> > > I would like to clarify that most of the time, when we use "sp" in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #14 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #12)
> > I would like to clarify that most of the time, when we use "sp" in the
> > clobbers list, the stack does *not* need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #12)
> I would like to clarify that most of the time, when we use "sp" in the
> clobbers list, the stack does *not* need to be realigned. And in those
Yes, stack alignmen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #12 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
While I know about DRAP, I'm otherwise not very familiar with GCC internals, so
I don't quite understand your points.
I would like to clarify that most of the time, when we use "sp" in the clobbers
list, t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224
--- Comment #3 from Melissa ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> See PR 14319 which I think this is a dup of.
PR 14319 refers to a case in which you are allowed to read the common prefix of
a structure when the structure is not the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82205
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81314
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:42:20 2017
New Revision: 252864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:41:29 2017
New Revision: 252863
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252863&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-12 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:40:51 2017
New Revision: 252862
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252862&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-12 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81768
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:39:36 2017
New Revision: 252861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-05 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81768
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:38:43 2017
New Revision: 252860
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252860&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-05 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81687
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:37:16 2017
New Revision: 252858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-08-09 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81621
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:35:48 2017
New Revision: 252857
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-08-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:34:10 2017
New Revision: 252856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-08-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45784
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:33:08 2017
New Revision: 252855
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252855&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-07-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81766
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:32:05 2017
New Revision: 252854
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252854&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-08-08 Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79499
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:32:05 2017
New Revision: 252854
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252854&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-08-08 Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:30:40 2017
New Revision: 252853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libquadmath/65757
* math/roundq.c: Cherry-pick upstrea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81225
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 21:30:04 2017
New Revision: 252852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-06-30 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Are you sure?
At least on gcc-6-branch I'm seeing:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /usr/src/gcc-6/obj28/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/gcc-6/obj28/gcc/
/usr/src/gcc-6/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr81224.c
-B/usr/src/gcc-6/obj28/x86_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
And PR 65892.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
See PR 14319 which I think this is a dup of.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80101
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79794
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Actually, the build still fails in the same place - here is the assembler
> for the reduced test-case from pr81241. I'll look at the c++ test case in
> due course.
>
> any thoughts?
Take a look at the o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82066
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Fri Sep 15 20:55:52 2017
New Revision: 252848
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252848&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-15 Steve Ellcey
PR target/82066
* doc/extend.texi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82071
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82071
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Sep 15 20:49:02 2017
New Revision: 252847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement C11 excess precision semantics for conversions (PR c/82071).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224
Bug ID: 82224
Summary: Strict-aliasing not noticing valid aliasing of two
unions with active members
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(float)INT_MAX gets rounded to 2^31. When you try to convert it to int, it
doesn't fit, so the compiler is at liberty to return INT_MAX if it likes.
clang's -fsanitize=undefined does complain on your code (not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #9)
> I might be misunderstanding, but I don't think we need DRAP for our use
> case. We just need assurance that the frame pointer (RBP) has been set up
> before the inli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What target is this for?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223
Bug ID: 82223
Summary: Incorrect optimization for lossy round trips of
arithmetic types
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 42183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42183&action=edit
assembler for C++ testcase with .cfi_xxx
this gives, when linked to the GCC8 static libstdc++ (I have a patch th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64644
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64644
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Sep 15 19:22:35 2017
New Revision: 252835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-09-15 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez
Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68177
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benni.buch at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)
> Created attachment 42182 [details]
> assembler for pr81241 Ada testcase with .cfi_xxx
>
> I rebased my patches to enable .cfi_xxx for Darwin (no claim that they ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 42182
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42182&action=edit
assembler for pr81241 Ada testcase with .cfi_xxx
I rebased my patches to enable .cfi_xxx for Darwin (no claim th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Bug ID: 8
Summary: wrong uninitialized reference in lambda capture in
fold expression
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
Try this one:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 4f0414ffa9d..ee27273c80d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -13801,6 +13801,7 @@ ix86_get_drap_rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #9 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
I might be misunderstanding, but I don't think we need DRAP for our use case.
We just need assurance that the frame pointer (RBP) has been set up before the
inline asm is inserted.
If clobbering "sp" isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #7)
> Putting "sp" in the clobbers list is something that was suggested to me on
> the GCC mailing list a while back. And, other than this rare bug, it seems
> to do exactl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On September 15, 2017 5:02:36 PM GMT+02:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE" wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
>--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
With the patch in comment 7 applied on top of r252799, I have bootstrapped
x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0, configured with:
../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc8w
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #7 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Putting "sp" in the clobbers list is something that was suggested to me on the
GCC mailing list a while back. And, other than this rare bug, it seems to do
exactly what we want, which is, force GCC to save
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
paravirt_read_pmc should be fixed not to clobber SP when stack realignment
is needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So, FAOD, the fix is a work-around for a bug in either the assembler or
> unwinder? (the original DWARF output is expected to be well-formed?)
Yes, that's my understanding.
> Given that the GCC unwinder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I did this and there's nothing interesting revealed - everything
> consistently gives the same output (and dwarfdump --verify claims it's
> valid).
Not for me though. Here's the output on the C++ testcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 42181
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42181&action=edit
C++ testcase
To be compiled at -O2 and run:
(botcazou@goole) ~ $ g++ -o t t.C -O2
(botcazou@goole) ~ $ ./t
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82215
--- Comment #5 from Lee Busby ---
Thank you very much for reading my report, Mr. Koenig. I probably should have
pulled out footnote #6 as an explicit comment here, as it comes closest to my
own first guess at a "feature request".
As you have se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78648
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Sep 15 16:31:15 2017
New Revision: 252829
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252829&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/78648
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Sep 15 16:17:55 2017
New Revision: 252827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-15 Jackson Woodruff
PR tree-optimization/71026
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
--- Comment #3 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #2)
> Created attachment 42178 [details]
> preprocessed linux/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c, compressed
>
> This is one of the typical files showing the behavi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 15:54:04 2017
New Revision: 252824
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252824&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/82192
* combine.c (make_extraction):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #3 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
This has been seen on Fedora GCC 7.1.1 and Debian GCC 6.2.0-3.
This bug can be recreated with the above kernel git branch and the attached
.config by typing "make ARCH=i386 arch/x86/events/core.o".
I've al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #2 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Created attachment 42180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42180&action=edit
kernel config file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #1 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Created attachment 42179
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42179&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
Bug ID: 82221
Summary: internal compiler error: in print_reg, at
config/i386/i386.c:17656
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82158
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
> > Bootstrap completed on Darwin with the tentative fix (and the workaround for
> > PR target/80556) and the ACATS tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
> Thanks for the detailed analysis. Indeed
>
> /* Mark sections as preserved that are required by to be preserved
> sections. */
> f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82220
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Nesterovskiy ---
Yes, I've applied a patch and looks like it helped:
---
Overhead SamplesSymbol
trunk@252796 + patch
31.57%412037mgau_eval
30.54%--> 397608vector_gautbl_eval_logs3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21850
--- Comment #6 from palves at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: palves
Date: Fri Sep 15 14:53:48 2017
New Revision: 252822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252822&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix compile time error when using ansidecl.h with an old versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Also, stripped gcc/*.o files from the latest stage between non-patched and
> patched differ just in the expected combine.o and cc1*checksum.o.
I see no co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Another testcase:
struct A {
void foo(int *);
};
struct B : A {
template void bar(int *p1) {
[&] { foo(p1); };
};
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79987, which changed state.
Bug 79987 Summary: [CHKP] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 14:11:57 2017
New Revision: 252820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r251049
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 14:11:27 2017
New Revision: 252819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r251049
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Guskov ---
Yep, 187 seems to be working now.
Not sure about performance, will check this next week when the automatic perf
build arrives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Created attachment 42178
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42178&action=edit
preprocessed linux/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c, compressed
This is one of the typical files showing t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78648
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67591
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Sep 15 13:12:33 2017
New Revision: 252817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR target/67591] ARM v8 Thumb IT blocks are deprecated
2017-09-15 Chr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Vlad Zolotarov from comment #10)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> > It says not to attach an archive containing the things we don't want (e.g.
> > sources without includes). A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 82195, which changed state.
Bug 82195 Summary: Undemangleable lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:23:57 2017
New Revision: 252815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[demangler] Fix nested generic lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:15:52 2017
New Revision: 252814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r249728
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:40 2017
New Revision: 252813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r249728
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:19 2017
New Revision: 252812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r251530
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:01 2017
New Revision: 252811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r251020
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
