[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41101|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/79141] [6/7 Regression] std::pair p = {}; fails to compile due to ambiguous overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79141 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner --- On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:35:20PM +, kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 > > --- Comment #9 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- > I've got a patch no

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #88 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #87) > On April 1, 2017 4:40:19 PM GMT+02:00, "bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de" > wrote: > >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 > > > >--- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #87 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On April 1, 2017 4:40:19 PM GMT+02:00, "bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 > >--- Comment #86 from Bernd Edlinger >--- >Created attachme

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r158965 I think.

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/80281] New: Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80281 Bug ID: 80281 Summary: Wrong constant folding Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/70703] [6/7 regression] Regression in register usage on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70703 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug translation/80280] New: Missing closing quote (%>) c/semantics.c and c/c-typeck.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80280 Bug ID: 80280 Summary: Missing closing quote (%>) c/semantics.c and c/c-typeck.c Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/80176] [5/6/7 Regression] cannot bind reference to static member function using object access expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80176 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41102 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41102&action=edit gcc7-pr80176.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/80279] Implement DR 2061

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80279 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONF

[Bug c++/80279] New: Implement DR 2061

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80279 Bug ID: 80279 Summary: Implement DR 2061 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigne

[Bug translation/80278] New: Messages with untranslated string fragment in config/i386/i386.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80278 Bug ID: 80278 Summary: Messages with untranslated string fragment in config/i386/i386.c Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78002] gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78002 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-04/msg00082.html The ICE is gone, but gnat.dg/stack_check[12].adb fail execution test.

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #86 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 41101 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41101&action=edit another trial patch This is another approach for a patch that reflects what I understood so far what the C++1

[Bug sanitizer/79993] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:7344

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/80235] ICE: coarrays, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libgomp/79876] [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/strassen.f90 -O execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79876 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Anyway, here is an untested patch to bump the default on Darwin only. The patch fixes the issue on darwin16. Testing on darwin10 in progress.

[Bug fortran/78293] [5/6/7 Regression] SIGABRT with function result used as argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Revision r242875 caused pr79344. Is there any plan to back port the fixes to > > the 6 branch? > > That's a good question. What is your opinion? Well, it is a [5/6/7 Regression]. How much pain doe

[Bug fortran/78293] [5/6/7 Regression] SIGABRT with function result used as argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293 --- Comment #6 from Andre Vehreschild --- Hi Paul, I am busy doing Coarray work at the moment. So from my side: no time. You may want to have a look whether the part in trans-expr.c fixes the issue sufficiently or with just a small work-around

[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #12) > Hi Dominique, > > I was intending to backport to 6-branch but wanted to be sure that no > nasties come out of the woodwork on trunk. > > Best re

[Bug fortran/78293] [5/6/7 Regression] SIGABRT with function result used as argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > Revision r242875 caused pr79344. Is there any plan to back port the fixes to > the 6 branch? That's a good question. What is your opinion? Cheers Paul

[Bug fortran/79382] DTIO ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80156] [7 Regression] Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80235] ICE: coarrays, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > Reduced submodule > > submodule ( m ) sm > > contains > > module subroutine cgca_pfem_map( origin, rot, bcol, bcou ) > implicit none > rea

[Bug fortran/71838] ICE with OpenCoarrays on submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79676] [submodules] Compilation/linking error when module procedures PRIVATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79676 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/71838] ICE with OpenCoarrays on submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Apr 1 11:35:14 2017 New Revision: 246632 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246632&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-04-01 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/7

[Bug ipa/80277] New: ipa-icf missing overlooking functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80277 Bug ID: 80277 Summary: ipa-icf missing overlooking functions Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug libstdc++/80276] New: pretty printer for std::unique_ptr shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 Bug ID: 80276 Summary: pretty printer for std::unique_ptr shows type as std::unique_ptr Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/67396] [5 regression] Performance regression compiling variadic function with many arguments in RTL DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67396 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug debug/68860] [6/7/8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c -flto -O3 -g line 16/7 arg1 == 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |8.0 Summary|[6/7 regression]

[Bug c++/69953] [5/6/7 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Why can't the middle-end/LTO handle comdat groups with some hidden and some non-hidden aliases? I don't see something inherently wrong on what the C++ FE is doing. Shouldn't we privatize the whole comdat g

[Bug fortran/79676] [submodules] Compilation/linking error when module procedures PRIVATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79676 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Apr 1 09:35:52 2017 New Revision: 246631 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246631&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-04-01 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/79

[Bug debug/80263] gcc's internal type "sizetype" leaks out as base type name in the DWARF info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80263 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug libgomp/79876] [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/strassen.f90 -O execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79876 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41098 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41098&action=edit gcc7-pr79876.patch Found https://developer.apple.com/library/content/qa/qa1419/_index.html that documents the

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41097 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41097&action=edit gcc7-pr79390.patch Untested fix.