https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #12) > Hi Dominique, > > I was intending to backport to 6-branch but wanted to be sure that no > nasties come out of the woodwork on trunk. > > Best regards > > Paul > > PS Will be back in France late tonight and will start picking up the > threads again. My Mother's death and funeral have taken up the last 10 > days. > > On 3 November 2016 at 11:15, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr > <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834 > > > > Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Status|NEW |WAITING > > > > --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > > Paul, > > > > Are you planning to back port r241450? If no, is there any reason to keep > > this > > PR open? > > > > -- > > You are receiving this mail because: > > You are the assignee for the bug. > > You reported the bug. What do you think about backporting? I rather think that it would be safe after all this time on trunk. Paul
