https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79042
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Jan 12 07:44:17 2017
New Revision: 244347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79042
* lto-cgraph.c (lto_output_varp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79041
--- Comment #5 from Robert Schiele ---
Thanks! I can confirm that this also fixes the original problem for all cases
we observed so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13563
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
With -Os, the jump2 pass does merge the 2 calls to foo, but that's way too late
for the resulting a!=0 ? 1 : 0 to be simplified.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79067
Bug ID: 79067
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c runs a million
times longer than it used to and times out
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79066
Bug ID: 79066
Summary: [7 Regression] non-PIC code generated for powerpc
glibc with -fpic
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79065
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
__attribute__((aligned(4)))
This causes the whole struct to become 4 byte aligned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79065
--- Comment #1 from Brian Viele ---
gcc version 5.4.1 20160609 (release) [ARM/embedded-5-branch revision 237715]
(GCC)
System: Linux xxx 4.4.0-47-generic #68~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 19:42:11
UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79065
Bug ID: 79065
Summary: ARM generates ldm/stm on packed structs with aligned
members
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14379
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14236
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65958
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14030
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13979
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16992
Bug 16992 depends on bug 13979, which changed state.
Bug 13979 Summary: Error message about no matching function for call with
derived class arguments could be improved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13979
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
OK, currently testing TARGET_LEGITIMATE_COMBINED_INSN solution. Thanks for the
analysis!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13563
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13452
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-18 20:25:19 |2017-1-11
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13214
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13166
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13005
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78002
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to hs.naveen2u from comment #2)
> Could not reproduce the issue on latest FSF source:-
>
> Tried using the following command:-
> -gcc -fstack-check gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12697
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12672
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12333
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78337
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 11 21:43:42 2017
New Revision: 244340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78337 - ICE on invalid with generic lambda
* seman
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24511
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24511
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Jan 11 21:02:46 2017
New Revision: 244337
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244337&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/24511 - [DR 470] explicit instantiation/extern template unsats
// o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77812
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Jan 11 20:49:50 2017
New Revision: 244336
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244336&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/77812
* name-lookup.c (set_namespace_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12228
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-18 20:16:40 |2017-1-11
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12096
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77812
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Jan 11 20:37:16 2017
New Revision: 244335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/77812
* name-lookup.c (set_namespace_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] atomic |[6 Regression] atomic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 71537, which changed state.
Bug 71537 Summary: GCC rejects consetxpr boolean conversions and comparisons on
the result of pointer arithmetic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 11 20:10:36 2017
New Revision: 244333
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71537
* fold-const.c (maybe_nonzero_address): Retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11858
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-10-10 00:00:00 |2017-1-11
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20308
Bug 20308 depends on bug 11814, which changed state.
Bug 11814 Summary: Code with missing "template" keyword wrongly accepted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944
Bug 12944 depends on bug 11814, which changed state.
Bug 11814 Summary: Code with missing "template" keyword wrongly accepted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6023
Bug 6023 depends on bug 11814, which changed state.
Bug 11814 Summary: Code with missing "template" keyword wrongly accepted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11776
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11582
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064
Bug ID: 79064
Summary: Cannot overload member function templates on type of
literal
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11187
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-01-13 00:00:00 |2017-1-11
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79059
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can't remember if this is the same but
I don't know how to describe this optimization right now but take the following
two functions:
struct arc
{
int ident;
};
int bea_is_dual_infeasible( struct arc *a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79063
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32207
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Jan 11 18:33:13 2017
New Revision: 244331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/47931 - missing -Waddress warning for comparison with NULL
gcc/tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78341
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 11 18:09:58 2017
New Revision: 244329
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244329&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78341
* parser.c (cp_parser_std_attribute_spec): Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 11 18:08:57 2017
New Revision: 244328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244328&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72813
* gcc.c (default_compilers): Don't add -o %g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72783
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
I've run out of time to implement this in GCC 7 but I'll see about handling it
in GCC 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77708
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77675
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79051
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: joel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
7.0.0 20170111
Nothing particularly special about the build. Just fails early with ICE.
/home/joel/test-gcc/b-sh-elf-gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/joel/test-gcc/b-sh-elf-gcc/./gcc/ -nostdinc
-B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79059
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79062
Bug ID: 79062
Summary: -Wformat-length warnings disabled by -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77812
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
The struct variant only 'works' because 'struct X' is a valid incomplete struct
declaration. Try:
struct f {};
template
void f ()
{
struct f Q;
}
template void f ();
void f() void f() [with = int]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Jan 11 17:28:52 2017
New Revision: 244326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244326&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/78768 - -Walloca-larger-than and -Wformat-length warnings disabled by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Jan 11 17:25:40 2017
New Revision: 244325
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244325&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Offer suggestions for unrecognized sanitizer options (PR driver/78877)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61450
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Can regtest it and submit it to the list for review? Many thanks…
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79042
--- Comment #3 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:53:52 2017
New Revision: 244324
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244324&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79042
* lto-cgraph.c (lto_output_varp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79041
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Robert Schiele from comment #3)
> If you point me to the specific patch that you have in mind I can in
> parallel already test whether besides the test case I provided it also fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78253
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:13:14 2017
New Revision: 244320
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244320&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR target/78253 Call weak function instead of strong when called t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77812
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79060
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
There is no such guarantee, it can change any time, even in changes not
reflected in X.Y.Z version. That said, after X.1 is released, they change not
very frequently.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046
--- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Another question is whether GCC guarantees that its APIs (as can be used by a
plugin; e.g., AST) are binary compatible across Y.Z in GCC X.Y.Z?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79051
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|poerpc64*-*-* |poerpc64*-*-*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #17)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
>
> > Unless people commonly use
> > RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-mtune=cortex-a15,-mtune=cortex-m7\}' o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
Bug ID: 79061
Summary: [7 Regression][LTO][ASAN] LTO plus ASAN fails with
"AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79060
Bug ID: 79060
Summary: gfortran ICE with deferred-length character component
initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319
--- Comment #17 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Unless people commonly use
> RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-mtune=cortex-a15,-mtune=cortex-m7\}' or
> something similar, that might work well. The amo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> So, is what gcc trunk generates less efficient than what it used to generate
> before, or is just different? If the latter, surely the test should be
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #15 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: avieira
Date: Wed Jan 11 15:08:25 2017
New Revision: 244319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78255: Make postreload aware of NO_FUNCTION_CSE
gcc/Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
FYI: -mtune=cortex-a15 works for an arm-none-eabi toolchain targetting
Cortex-M7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78397
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
The __aeabi_read_tp call is to a special helper function and not really
considered to be a 'public interface'; the EABI only requires conformance to
the stack alignment constraints at public interfaces.
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> > So do you want something like:
> > /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicts with multilib options" { arm*-*-* } {
> > "-mcpu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78273
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78134
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.4 |5.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78134
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 11 14:44:15 2017
New Revision: 244318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244318&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78134 fix return types of heterogeneous lookup functions
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78273
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 11 14:44:04 2017
New Revision: 244317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78273 fix count to work with partitioning function
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77598
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The warning is gone with r242523.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
