https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 30 06:54:02 2016
New Revision: 239856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/72866
* tree-vect-patterns.c (search_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77363
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 30 06:46:38 2016
New Revision: 239855
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239855&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/77363
* dwarf2out.c (modified_type_die): Use look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77377
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 30 06:45:56 2016
New Revision: 239854
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239854&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/77377
* simplify-rtx.c (avoid_constant_pool_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77389
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 30 06:44:43 2016
New Revision: 239853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/77389
* g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/template-params-12f.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67962
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-10-14 00:00:00 |2016-8-29
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> > Is the -Wobjc-root-class warning something we want to have in gcc objc as
> > well?
>
> What's the reasoning behind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77400
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77400
--- Comment #2 from Sergey ---
Indeed, I missed that it was dynamically linked by default and system bundled
( older ) libfortran was used. Thus it's a problem in the original program
which has hard-coded seed(12) as it had been a constant for y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77410
--- Comment #1 from J. Hart ---
If an additional level of macro referencing is added, the result is correct.
It would appear that if an argument is directly used with an concatenation
directive, that argument is not expanded.
example:
#define M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
It does look possible that this is an LRA issue. Here's the code right before
failure:
100dae08: f8 95 22 39 addir9,r2,-27144
100dae0c: 01 00 40 39 li r10,1
100dae10: 00 00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77410
Bug ID: 77410
Summary: macro reference supplied as macro reference argument
is not expanded
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
> The entire point of libssp is to provide this support on systems whose libc
> does not include it, so that both -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE and -fstack-protector*
> functionality would be available cross-platform.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
--- Comment #8 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> In fact this is by design. NetBSD for an example has ssp/stdio.h where you
> use that to get the fority.
This does not apply where the libc provides its own
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > NetBSD which provide SSP in libc
>
> This statement is not true for older versions of netbsd.
And really not true even for the current version of netbsd but t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
> NetBSD which provide SSP in libc
This statement is not true for older versions of netbsd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > I don't think this is a security hole at all. In fact the security holes
> > should be on the applications sid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
In fact this is by design. NetBSD for an example has ssp/stdio.h where you use
that to get the fority.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
--- Comment #2 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I don't think this is a security hole at all. In fact the security holes
> should be on the applications side rather than the library side.
The compiler is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is a security hole at all. In fact the security holes
should be on the applications side rather than the library side.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Backtrace info (svn r239837):
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
system.secondary_stack.ss_release (m=...) at ../rts/s-secsta.adb:479
479 To_Stack_Ptr (M.Sstk).Top := M.Sptr;
(g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:35:59PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406
>
> --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
> Previous patch was bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69201
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
> This may have been introduced by:
>
> 2016-08-03 Peter Bergner
>
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): Make LRA
> the def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
--- Comment #8 from John Marino ---
if that attempt doesn't let you reproduce it, and if it still happens when I
remove that flag, I can start bisecting and see if I can get it to a specific
day or even commit that caused it. That will obviously
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409
Bug ID: 77409
Summary: CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Unfortunately this is the first time I tried to build gcc 7.0 in this
> configuration. My previous builds were for gcc 6 and it's been several
> months since I ran a test build.
OK, I'll try a -fno-strict
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
--- Comment #6 from John Marino ---
oh, sorry, you're trying to bisect.
Unfortunately this is the first time I tried to build gcc 7.0 in this
configuration. My previous builds were for gcc 6 and it's been several months
since I ran a test build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77408
Bug ID: 77408
Summary: Copy relocation turns read-only data into writable
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> from the attached log:
> "Updated to revision 239832."
The latest _working_ revision, not the broken one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> > clang supports:
> > - the objc_root_class attribute, and
> > - a warning Wobjc-root-class that warns if a class bot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
--- Comment #4 from John Marino ---
from the attached log:
"Updated to revision 239832."
It will be awhile before I can retry without that no-strict-alias flag but I
will say all the test reports I've submitted over the last year have been built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
Previous patch was bogus. Try this one:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 239833)
+++ gcc/fortran/int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72715
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Mon Aug 29 21:16:04 2016
New Revision: 239845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/72715
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |target
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
See also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 which appears to be
very similar (slight difference in the error message).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Aug 29 20:26:13 2016
New Revision: 239842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/77403
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #12 from Berni ---
Thanks, Georg-Johann, I can confirm that
avr-g++ -S -Os -mmcu=atmega128 main.cpp
performs a 16-bit comparison but
avr-gcc -S -Os -mmcu=atmega128 main.c
works as expected (8-bit comparison)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77407
Bug ID: 77407
Summary: Optimize integer i / abs (i) into the sign of i
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71229
--- Comment #3 from gcc at tnix dot eu ---
I tried it in gcc 6.2 and it does compile in 6.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406
Bug ID: 77406
Summary: ICE in generic_correspondence, at
fortran/interface.c:1123
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66493
--- Comment #9 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Update, backtraces added :
$ gfortran-7-20160828 pr66493.f90
f951: internal compiler error: in resolve_typebound_procedure, at
fortran/resolve.c:12603
0x6e31ac resolve_typebound_procedure
../..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Aug 29 19:03:45 2016
New Revision: 239835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/77403
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Aug 29 18:58:10 2016
New Revision: 239834
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239834&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/77403
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
--- Comment #1 from John Marino ---
Created attachment 39515
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39515&action=edit
gzipped build log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405
Bug ID: 77405
Summary: SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ---
And now the hopefully final patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01990.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #3 from Johannes S. Mueller-Roemer ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1)
> I think a better test-case is the following one, which does not depend on
> tuple at all:
>
> //#
> #include
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77292
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77292
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Aug 29 18:13:13 2016
New Revision: 239833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239833&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/77292
* c-common.c (warn_logical_not_parentheses)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Right, patch available at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01983.html
Currently fixing negative test failures for it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77379
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77398
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77379
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 29 16:42:57 2016
New Revision: 239830
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239830&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77379 - ABI tag on thunk
* mangle.c (maybe_check_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77398
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Aug 29 16:41:33 2016
New Revision: 239827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle errors in both args of va_arg
2016-08-29 Tom de Vries
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77363
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77400
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404
Bug ID: 77404
Summary: Add Wobjc-root-class
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: objc
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403
Bug ID: 77403
Summary: [7 Regression] assemble failure of vinserti64x4 with
-masm=intel
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: assemble-failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63789
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
Sorry, by recent I meant at least 6.1, I should have been more specific.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63789
--- Comment #5 from Richard PALO ---
Created attachment 39510
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39510&action=edit
tabs.ii
No, I still see the issue with both v5 and 4.9.4
attached is tabs.ii using -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63789
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup dot
org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77402
Bug ID: 77402
Summary: Use EBO for _Rb_tree_impl::_M_key_compare
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ABI
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77338
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 39509
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39509&action=edit
gcc7-pr77338.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
--- Comment #9 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: foreese
Date: Mon Aug 29 12:24:25 2016
New Revision: 239819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-29 Fritz Reese
Fix, reorganize, and clar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77338
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77377
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #20 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Senthil Kumar Selvaraj from comment #19)
> Can reproduce this on trunk
So it's not related to PR72767 then? (Fixed since 2016-08-01)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77401
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 39507
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39507&action=edit
reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77401
Bug ID: 77401
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: in simplify_binary_operation_1, at
simplify-rtx.c:3731 with out-of-bounds vector access
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77400
Bug ID: 77400
Summary: fortran compfails on random_seed(PUT) if seed size is
less than 33
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov ---
I should also mention that for scalar code:
void f(float *o, int *i)
{
*o++ = *i++; *o++ = *i++; *o++ = *i++; *o++ = *i++;
}
where SLP vectorization succeeds, one can see that c-style casts exist for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77389
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399
Bug ID: 77399
Summary: Fails to use native instructions for vector casts
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 39505
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39505&action=edit
gcc7-pr77375.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65274
--- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
It works now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77261
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Aug 29 08:29:16 2016
New Revision: 239817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/77261 Run random_3 testcase only when real(10) is available.
Mo
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
