https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I guess the question is if CLASSTYPE_HAS_MUTABLE should be set on types derived
from CLASSTYPE_HAS_MUTABLE types (then cp_apply_type_quals_to_decl's
/* If the type has (or might have) a mutable component, that component
might be modified. */
if (TYPE_HAS_MUTABLE_P (type) || !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
type_quals &= ~TYPE_QUAL_CONST;
would do its job), or if instead in this spot (and maybe various others) should
walk the bases and check for TYPE_HAS_MUTABLE_P.
