https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72758
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Note the testcase is wrong (but only slightly).
Oh, you're right, thanks.
That code was tested on the RPI3 to ensure it compiled as expected under
Aarch32. Usi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72758
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the testcase is wrong (but only slightly).
Also as a workaround you can use a GNU C extension.
Something like:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
poly128_t a = {0};
uint64x2_t b = (uint64x2_t)(a);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72758
Bug ID: 72758
Summary: GCC 4.9.2 on Aarch64 missing vreinterpretq_u64_p128
and friends
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71942
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Take example in comment #1:
This is what is produced for AARCH64:
(insn 8 6 9 (set (reg:HI 77)
(mem/v/c:HI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 68 virtual-stack-vars)
(const_int -2 [0xfffe]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71680
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Arseny, I could not reproduce the problem using your testcase, and I tried a
dozen or so revisions around 20160626 buiding powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe
cross-compilers on an x86_64-linux host. Please specify th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54924
--- Comment #3 from David Stone ---
Also filed against libc++ here: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28777
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72757
Bug ID: 72757
Summary: atomic test don't run with RUNTESTFLAGS=atomic.exp
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner ---
Thanks for doing this. It looks like Bill will do spec testing, but if he
doesn't I will fire off a run early next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68901
--- Comment #2 from Ivan Sorokin ---
Created attachment 39034
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39034&action=edit
bug-68901.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68901
Ivan Sorokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755
--- Comment #5 from Fran Martinez Fadrique ---
Created attachment 39033
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39033&action=edit
Dependency
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Insufficient has been provided.
% grep -E ^module a.f90 b.f90 c.f90
a.f90:module m_messages
b.f90:module m_msg
c.f90:module m_string
% gfc7 -c c.f90
c.f90:13:6:
use m_util_convert
1
Fat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72756
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect it is rejected at instantation time rather than definition time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72756
Bug ID: 72756
Summary: Using an enum as a constant expression via dot
operator should not compile.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755
--- Comment #3 from Fran Martinez Fadrique ---
The same problem appears in previous versions (at least 6.1.1 and 5.4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755
--- Comment #1 from Fran Martinez Fadrique ---
Created attachment 39031
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39031&action=edit
Dependency
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755
--- Comment #2 from Fran Martinez Fadrique ---
Created attachment 39032
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39032&action=edit
Dependency
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755
Bug ID: 72755
Summary: Internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:1369
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72753
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Same problem with an unnamed struct defined via an alias-declaration:
using S = struct { int a[]; };
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754
Bug ID: 72754
Summary: pointer to an unnamed struct with a sole flexible
array member accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72753
Bug ID: 72753
Summary: sole flexible array member in a typedef rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72750
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72752
Bug ID: 72752
Summary: internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #17 from Bernd Edlinger ---
And here an alternative patch for the other paradoxical subreg bug:
Index: cse.c
===
--- cse.c (revision 238891)
+++ cse.c (worki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72751
Bug ID: 72751
Summary: anonymous union within an anonymous union accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
Thanks, Vlad! I'll do some benchmarking with this patch in the next few days.
Much obliged!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Hi, on the next week I am going to commit the patch I've just attached. The
final version of the patch will have more comments.
With the patch LRA generates the same code for the test case as reload (th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Created attachment 39029
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39029&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72750
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
This is not a bug. You could make the file using atoi declare it itself
rather than including (because the type of atoi doesn't involve
any types from standard headers, doing so is valid)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72750
Bug ID: 72750
Summary: Not possible to use -fno-builtin to suppress
optimization of some standard functions like atoi
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71165
Aleksey Covacevice changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksey.covacevice at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
anthonyfk at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.3.0 |5.1.0
--- Comment #17 from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
anthonyfk at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Alternative patch, that looks like it fixes this issue (but not the other bug).
Note: it generates one instruction more than the first patch, thus
paradoxical subregs trigger at least one other bug, and ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734
--- Comment #12 from Bill Seurer ---
Those fail for power as well:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-07/msg01737.html
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68159
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clopez at igalia dot com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71926
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71853
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71573
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71926
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:39:39 2016
New Revision: 238886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71926
* c-common.c (c_common_truthvalue_conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71573
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:36:46 2016
New Revision: 238885
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238885&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71573
* c-decl.c (implicitly_declare): Return decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71853
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:34:55 2016
New Revision: 238884
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238884&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71853
* c-parser.c (c_parser_switch_statement): In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71742
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71742
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:32:27 2016
New Revision: 238883
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238883&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71742
* c-decl.c (finish_struct): Rephrase an erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71614
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-07/msg01768.html
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: libgomp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2016-7-29
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62096
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
7.2/8: For an enumeration whose underlying type is fixed, the values of the
enumeration are the values of the underlying type. Otherwise, for an
enumeration where emin is the smallest enumerator and emax is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Jul 29 15:48:25 2016
New Revision: 238877
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238877&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/57558
* tree-vect-loop-mani
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69964
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > This appears to be fixed on trunk.
>
> Confirmed. I get an ICE with revision r238821, but not with r238824.
> Likely fall out of r238822 (pr71883).
For the record, it is also fixed on the gcc-5 an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71939
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
For the record, I brought this up on the C committee's mailing list for
discussion. Since the standard can be read (at least) two different ways here
I'll submit a proposal into the next mailing to clarify th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71662
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE |[4.9/5/6/7 Regression][DR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71747
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72748
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
I am testing this:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 7c8bb17..918c505 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -3858,6 +3858,10 @@ timode_scalar_chain::c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58059
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nacitar at ubercpp dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56163
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||potswa at mac dot com
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53618
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488
--- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 29 14:49:03 2016
New Revision: 238870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/51488
* g+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini ---
Fixed by the patch which fixed c++/71747. I'm adding a testcase and closing the
bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71742
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72457
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72457
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 29 14:08:03 2016
New Revision: 238868
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238868&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72457 - ICE with list-value-initialized base.
* in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72457
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 29 14:03:26 2016
New Revision: 238867
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238867&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72457 - ICE with list-value-initialized base.
* in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71986
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71926
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
--- Comment #52 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 12:39:25 2016
New Revision: 238864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/7652
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_args_builti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71976
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 12:34:21 2016
New Revision: 238863
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238863&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/71976
* combine.c (get_last_valu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71969
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71969
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 12:00:43 2016
New Revision: 238862
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238862&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71969
* c-decl.c (finish_function): Only set DECL_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71583
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71583
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 11:48:36 2016
New Revision: 238861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71583
* c-parser.c (c_parser_postfix_expression_af
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71574
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71574
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 11:28:57 2016
New Revision: 238859
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71574
* c-common.c (handle_alloc_align_attribute):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
--- Comment #51 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 11:26:46 2016
New Revision: 238858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/7652
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (altivec_expand_ld_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
--- Comment #50 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 11:22:42 2016
New Revision: 238857
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/7652
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (altivec_expand_ld_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
--- Comment #49 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jul 29 11:16:20 2016
New Revision: 238856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/7652
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (altivec_expand_ld_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69964
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71942
--- Comment #5 from Albi ---
OK ok, i see. Its a missed optimization due to volatile-problems..
I got a workaround however:
#define IO_READ(x) ( static_cast( *const_cast< typename
std::remove_volatile::type* >(&(x)) ))
The volatile is taken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72748
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70965
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72746
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|gcc ICE at -O2 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
93 matches
Mail list logo
