https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69270
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69270
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Jan 14 07:38:18 2016
New Revision: 232361
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232361&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH][PR tree-optimization/69270] Exploit VRP information in DOM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69270
Bug ID: 69270
Summary: DOM should exploit range information to create more
equivalences
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
PRE does some of it via tail merge:
find_duplicates: duplicate of
find_duplicates: duplicate of
Removing basic block 8
Removing basic block 9
Obviously if you have more complex code it won't do it.
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
jiaxun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jia1546 at 163 dot com
--- Comment #5 from jiax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the question comes here is which is better using ldr/str followed by a few
mult or ld3/st3 followed by a few shifts/adds. I think it depends on the
micro-arch really (at least for aarch32). In fact I t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67759
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
apinski@arm64:~/src/local/gcc/objdir/gcc$ gcc -W -Wall t9.c -S -save-temps
t9.c: In function ‘should_warn’:
t9.c:18:6: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘get’ makes pointer from integer
without a cast [-Wint-con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67759
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323
--- Comment #8 from Michael Collison ---
Hi Richard,
I tried this with trunk and was unable to generate the vld3. What vectorizer
options did you use?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67729
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69014
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37336|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69269
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-*-*|i686-*-* aarch64-*-*
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69269
Bug ID: 69269
Summary: ICE on ibm-ldouble.c in extract_constrain_insn_cached,
at recog.c:2201
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69268
Bug ID: 69268
Summary: Sourced allocation calls function twice
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6 Regression] internal |[6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
gcc t.c -std=gnu89 -flto -fsanitize=shift -c; gcc -flto -flto=128 t.o
Is enough to reproduce the ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The ICE happens on aarch64 also. Trying to reduce it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sasha Levin from comment #3)
> I didn't get all the way through, but with the attached preprocessed source
> file:
Getting it down to one preprocessed source is very useful and can be easily
red
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #3 from Sasha Levin ---
I didn't get all the way through, but with the attached preprocessed source
file:
$ gcc -flto -flto=128 -Wp,-MD,init/.calibrate.o.d -nostdinc -D__KERNEL__ -Wall
-Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #2 from Sasha Levin ---
Created attachment 37337
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37337&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69263
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02055.html
The patch proposed here will again "simplify"
(plus:DI (plus:DI (reg:DI 165 [ val+8 ])
(reg:DI 169 [+8 ]))
(reg:DI 76 ca))
to this
(pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 13 23:47:45 2016
New Revision: 232356
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/66487
* ipa-polymorphic-call.c (inlined_polymorph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63359
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #10 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69030
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll note that valtrack.[ch] has some APIs that might be useful, at least they
are used by both RTL DCE and DF note problem computation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63646
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Jan 13 22:55:31 2016
New Revision: 232354
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232354&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/63347
* haifa-sched.c (prune_ready_list): If we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Thanks for your help! I can confirm that the first patch fixes the problem in
the test cases on powerpc64le. (I haven't done any other testing with it.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69267
Bug ID: 69267
Summary: [cilkplus] ICE when calling a function with an empty
class as an argument
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252
--- Comment #3 from Roman Zhuykov ---
I'll try to help. While working with expanding SMS functionality 4-5 years ago
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01807.html), I create several
fixes not connected to my main non-doloop-support pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412
c...@spin-digital.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@spin-digital.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68803
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6 regression] |gcc.vect/powerpc/20050603-3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00871.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68803
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-12-08 00:00:00 |2016-1-13
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69032
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69067
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69102
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
.align 2
.p2align 4,,15
.globl unpack_1
.type unpack_1, @function
unpack_1:
fmr 1,2
blr
.long 0
.byte 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
.size unpack_1,.-unpack_1
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20160113 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69014
--- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson ---
Created attachment 37336
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37336&action=edit
proposed patch
This appears to work on this test case, producing the expected
Doloop: doloop pattern cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66208
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68977
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66208
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Wed Jan 13 20:03:26 2016
New Revision: 232345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Improve warning locations (PR66208)
PR c/66208
* c-commo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68977
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Jan 13 19:36:46 2016
New Revision: 232343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't gimplify in ssa mode if seen_error in oacc_xform_loop
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119
--- Comment #9 from PeteVine ---
Never mind the last one! :) It seems gcc's LTO wasn't to blame after all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69156
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Nothing has changed here, so I don't know why it would start failing on Cygwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69156
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 13 19:21:59 2016
New Revision: 232342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69156
* gimple.c (validate_type): Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69223
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Slightly reduced:
#include
#include
int main() {
std::vector> out;
auto saveChan = [&](auto && f) {
f({});
};
saveChan([](decltype(out)::value_type const & i){ return i;});
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69042
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed, even on aarch64 too. Replacing the asm with:
>
> asm("":::"x0","x1","x2","x3","x4","x5","x6","x7","x8","x9","x10","x11","x12",
> "x13","x1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On January 13, 2016 7:08:28 PM GMT+01:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155
>
>--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>Created attachment 3733
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69014
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266
Bug ID: 69266
Summary: bootstrap failure undefined reference to
`std::basic_ios >::
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69258
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I don't see a need for these different structures to be able to alias.
(Flexible array members do need to be able to alias static storage, in the
case where that static storage was declare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37335
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37335&action=edit
gcc6-pr69155-wip.patch
Partial patch I've bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
Either our t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looks like a SMS pass bug.
In the original loop there is a a[i] memory load followed by addition of i to
that, for understandable reasons SMS wants to move the load as far as possible
from the addition, so it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #22 from Richard Henderson ---
I believe that Honza is over-thinking this in #c12.
Mike reports that the patch in #c9 works, which makes
sense to me based on where darwin emits its profiler call.
The patch could be improved to note t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69262
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
Julian Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jtaylor.debian at googlemail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Julian Taylor from comment #3)
> Similarly useful would be the related __has_attribute, those especially tend
> to cause a huge mess of version number checks.
That's already supported: https:/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Alexander Fomin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46002
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
Bug ID: 69265
Summary: Option suggestion provides a wrong hint
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68106
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44848
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68964
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jan 13 17:03:42 2016
New Revision: 232330
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232330&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 68964
gcc/
PR tree-opt/68964
* target.def (builtin_tm_load, builti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54896
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69264
Bug ID: 69264
Summary: ICE when building spidermonkey w/-maltivec -O3:
rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost, at
config/rs6000/rs6000.c:4350
Product: gcc
Version: unk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69263
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69263
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69229
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69245
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37332|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69245
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37329|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261
--- Comment #2 from Jens Auer ---
I have submitted a second bug report for the crash: Bug 69263. I don't know if
that was appropriate, but the bug has different effects on different versions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69263
--- Comment #1 from Jens Auer ---
The source code is same as in bug #69261. On gcc 5.2, it compiles but produces
a different output than a program compiled with clang. I have opened two
separate bug reports because the effects are different and i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69262
Bug ID: 69262
Summary: Request for better array bounds warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69263
Bug ID: 69263
Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_store_expression
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69110
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||68976
--- Comment #15 from vri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 13 16:25:56 2016
New Revision: 232327
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232327&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use ::isinf and ::isnan if libc defines them
PR libstdc++/48891
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261
Bug ID: 69261
Summary: Copying char arrays during constexpr evaluation does
not work reliably
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68950
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #6)
> posted RFC: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01749.html
pinged: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00831.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69030
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #4)
> I am working on the
> problem and hope to have a fix by Monday.
>
>
The problem is more severe than I thought. It is not only choice between
removed deb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69223
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69245
--- Comment #9 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37329
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37329&action=edit
factorize restoration code
works for this case but fully untested
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
