https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69110
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |68976
--- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00801.html:
...
> During testing however, I ran into two testsuite regressions:
>
> 1.
>
> -PASS: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr39516.f -O (test for excess errors)
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr39516.f -O (internal compiler error)
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr39516.f -O (test for excess errors)
>
> AFAIU, this is a duplicate of PR68976.
>
> Should I wait with committing the patch until PR68976 is fixed?
Yes - we shouldn't introduce new testsuite regressions willingly at this
point.
...
Adding dependency on PR68976.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68976
[Bug 68976] [6 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (and above) -fgraphite-identity (or
-floop-nest-optimize)
