https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68751
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68756
Bug ID: 68756
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE w/ -O1 -floop-nest-optimize and isl
0.15: isl-0.15/isl_id.c:213: unable to find id
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #13 from Nenad Vukicevic ---
For what is worth I filed two bug reports:
LLVM:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25757
APPLE:
Bug 23778972 (not sure how to get URL for this bug)
On 11/30/15 2:41 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wro
++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.3.1 20151206 [gcc-5-branch revision 231343] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-5-branch -m32 -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-5-branch -m64 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-5-branch -m32 -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65876
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68597
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68597
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 7 04:34:43 2015
New Revision: 231349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68597, fix auto9.C and auto-neg1.C with -std=c++1z.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68494
--- Comment #3 from Michael Collison ---
Previous discussion thread here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-09/msg00061.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68291
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I'm not comfortable with your relaxing the assert in cfgexpand.c:set_rtl. It
means we could have a PARALLEL for a RESULT_DECL *and* other variables, because
of coalescing. Although we can deal with PARAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754
Bug ID: 68754
Summary: Explicitly defaulted constexpr assignment operator
fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67322
Michael Collison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67322
--- Comment #1 from Michael Collison ---
Fixed via:
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=230853
r230853 | collison | 2015-11-24 23:51:55 -0700 (Tue, 24 Nov 2015) | 15 lines
2015-11-24 Michael Collison
* config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #20 from PaX Team ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #13)
> Note that in addition to complaining if *any* exit to the function doesn't
> have the correct "out" value, you also need to complain if calls to
> functions with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68753
Bug ID: 68753
Summary: PowerPC: double precision reciprocal estimate missed
optimisations
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302
--- Comment #10 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #8)
> Where in CC1 do you segfault? Can you show me the error message you get
> when compiling the test program using the latest gcc-5-branch sources.
The only messa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68752
Bug ID: 68752
Summary: PowerPC: vector reciprocal square root estimate missed
optimisations
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68740
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36619
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
This boils down to:
with Q; Use Q;
procedure P is
A: Root'Class := Create;
begin
A := Create;
end;
with Ada.Finalization; use Ada.Finalization;
package Q is
type Root is interface;
type Objec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042
--- Comment #8 from Victor Porton ---
> Only under certain circumstances though.
Yes, such circumstances as my toy (but representing a real case) program.
Such programs SHOULD be optimized, because the standards allow optimization
under such "c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Why we cannot?!
Because the correct semantics of the program need to be preserved.
> If you are afraid that this may introduce errors, you are not right, as this
> is allowed by Ada standards.
Only under
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66143
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |5.0
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042
--- Comment #6 from Victor Porton ---
> But you generally cannot do this optimization with controlled objects
> in real software.
Why we cannot?!
If you are afraid that this may introduce errors, you are not right, as this is
allowed by Ada sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66143
--- Comment #3 from jeditekunum at gmail dot com ---
Apparently there is something significant that I am not understanding here.
gprinstall is typically used to install a package for use system-wide in a
directory like /opt/{something}. On any no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Avoiding calling unnecessary routines when copying an object, is a VERY
> useful optimization, just because copying operation is VERY often in real
> software.
But you generally cannot do this optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68481
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68183
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68646
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68171
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68169
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67836
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67706
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67494
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67086
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66608
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66526
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66525
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66390
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66143
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66384
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66143
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65868
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65696
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65683
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65102
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64869
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64556
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63675
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63276
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63222
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68751
Bug ID: 68751
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/sancov/asan.c (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62230
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62193
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62122
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042
--- Comment #4 from Victor Porton ---
I utterly disagree.
Avoiding calling unnecessary routines when copying an object, is a VERY useful
optimization, just because copying operation is VERY often in real software.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68750
Bug ID: 68750
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/loop-8.c scan-rtl-dump-times
loop2_invariant "Decided" 1
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
Bug ID: 68749
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "2 true
changes made"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62065
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68748
Bug ID: 68748
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/20010430.f -O0 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61127
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68747
Bug ID: 68747
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 -O0 execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61027
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
Bug ID: 68746
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/read_dir.f90 -O0 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68745
Bug ID: 68745
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_modulo_1.f90 -O0
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60977
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744
Bug ID: 68744
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
Bug ID: 68743
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68742
Bug ID: 68742
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/event_2.f90 -fcoarray=lib
-O2 -lcaf_single -latomic execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60730
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60164
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60164
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Dec 6 18:53:37 2015
New Revision: 231342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/60164
* doc/gnat_ugn/gnat_and_program_execution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60164
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Dec 6 18:53:54 2015
New Revision: 231343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/60164
* doc/gnat_ugn/gnat_and_program_execution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68741
Bug ID: 68741
Summary: FAIL: tr1/8_c_compatibility/cstdio/functions.cc (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60163
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68740
Bug ID: 68740
Summary: FAIL: experimental/type_erased_allocator/1.cc (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50048
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50048
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Dec 6 18:44:56 2015
New Revision: 231341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gnattools/
PR ada/50048
* Makefile.in (ftop_srcdir): N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739
Bug ID: 68739
Summary: FAIL: 30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc (test for
excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68738
Bug ID: 68738
Summary: call to overridden function segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68737
Bug ID: 68737
Summary: FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/14220.cc execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68736
Bug ID: 68736
Summary: FAIL:
libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-
cplx-dbl.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1
(test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68735
Bug ID: 68735
Summary: FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print ab
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68734
Bug ID: 68734
Summary: FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
Bug ID: 68733
Summary: FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68732
--- Comment #3 from matszpk ---
Thank you for quick answer and advice. Now, I am using default gcc-5 from
OpenSUSE Leap 42.1. Perhaps, I will try to use GCC 5.3 in near future...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36902|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68732
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68732
--- Comment #1 from matszpk ---
Created attachment 36936
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36936&action=edit
preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68732
Bug ID: 68732
Summary: Internal error while compiling CLRadeonExtender
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48756
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59907
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59234
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58891
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58881
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58870
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58573
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58299
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48756
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
No. It looks like it was fixed in 4.3.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
