https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68576
--- Comment #1 from majun ---
Sorry forget the command.
The example is compiled with
gcc -S -msse4.2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 -fdump-tree-parloops-details -O3
interchange-2.f -o interchange-2.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68434
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68379
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68379
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> *** Bug 68575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The testcase in PR68575 doesn't require avx, so might be useful for the
testsuite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68576
Bug ID: 68576
Summary: scev failed for loop auto parallelize
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68379
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68575
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68575
Bug ID: 68575
Summary: [6 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed, definition in
block 2 follows the use
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68470
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68574
programmerjake at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||programmerjake at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68574
Bug ID: 68574
Summary: add -W#pragma-messages equivalent
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68573
Bug ID: 68573
Summary: [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=
discarded without notice
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
Bug ID: 68572
Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68571
Bug ID: 68571
Summary: provide __builtin_cookie_size
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
Anthony Brandon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36706|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, I was doing this on top of the patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg00686.html
The subreg_highpart_operator predicate is defined as:
(define_special_predicate "su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The dump-ada-spec-2.C had failed with my local change (C++ flexible arrays
> change from 'array(0 .. -1)' to 'array(size_t)'; I expect the latter is more
> correct). While reproducing the failure, I used t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
The dump-ada-spec-2.C had failed with my local change (C++ flexible arrays
change from 'array(0 .. -1)' to 'array(size_t)'; I expect the latter is more
correct). While reproducing the failure, I used the opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #14 from M Joshua Ryan ---
Created attachment 36850
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36850&action=edit
gmp component triggering the same error
I've been able to modify some of the gmp sources to avoid this bug, by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68569
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68570
Bug ID: 68570
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68565
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov from comment #9)
> This also needs to be applied to the 4.9 branch -- it also contains an
> offending commit.
Thanks for the remainder. I've just committed the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Nov 26 22:13:36 2015
New Revision: 230986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/67954
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In case someone gets here digging for more information about the patch above
than what's in comments, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02018.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Nov 26 21:57:40 2015
New Revision: 230985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67753] adjust for padding when bypassing memory in assign_parm_setup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #57 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Nov 26 21:57:40 2015
New Revision: 230985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67753] adjust for padding when bypassing memory in assign_parm_setu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Yet another example:
template struct S {};
template S f() {}
int main() {f();}
(with Ian's go demangler:)
markus@x4 tmp % c++filt_ _Z1fIiE1SIDTdecvPT_Li0EEEv
S f()
markus@x4 tmp % c++f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68569
Bug ID: 68569
Summary: ICE with automatic character object and DATA
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Personal usage of "-finit-character" :
ONLY for debugging/checking, NEVER for production builds.
Issue is related to pr59537, where :
array , dimension(n) , -finit-real
This pr68568 differs in :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
As already known, this works without an error :
(A SAVE statement without a saved entity list is treated as though
it contained the names of all allowed items in the same scoping unit.)
$ gfortran -g -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
Bug ID: 68568
Summary: ICE with automatic character object and save, in
combination with some options
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
$ cat z1.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: a(2.,2) = 1
integer, parameter :: b(2) = a(1:2, 2)
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z1.f90
f951: internal compiler error: compare_bound_int(): B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
Bug ID: 68567
Summary: ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different
cases/messages)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Same issue with variants ...
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = 2
integer, parameter :: a(2.) = 1
integer, parameter :: b(n, n) = reshape([a, -a], [n, n])
end
$ cat z3.f90
progra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Bug ID: 68566
Summary: ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or
corruption)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68565
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2015-11-26
CC|
with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151126 (experimental) [trunk revision 230923] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The nsdmi-union6.C test failed after some of my (local) changes to the C++
> implementation of flexible array members and I was able to trigger the
> failure with an unmodified GCC and the modified test cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2015-04-09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
Bug ID: 68564
Summary: ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67238
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Nov 26 18:43:47 2015
New Revision: 230981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/67238
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67238
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67238
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Let's add the testcase and close the bug as fixed for 6.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68562
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|config/i386/morestack.S |morestack misaligns stack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #8)
> FAIL: g++.dg/pr67876.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
I inadvertently patched in the same test twice. It should be fixed now with
r230980.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
The nsdmi-union6.C test failed after some of my (local) changes to the C++
implementation of flexible array members and I was able to trigger the failure
with an un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 36849
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36849&action=edit
testcase
Compile with
g++ -O2 -flto -g -fPIC -std=gnu++0x -march=bdver1c testcase.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #4)
> fixed in r230918
Thanks!
I think if you make the changelog part of the commit message (in particular the
line containing PR tree-optimization/68453) an en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jiří Engelthaler from comment #10)
> Will this bug be resolved in 6.0 release?
Could you submit your patch to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org? See
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/ for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This issue is host-dependent, it doesn't reproduce with a cross to 64-bit
> SPARC.
>
> The problematic types are:
>
> (gdb) p debug_tree(t1)
> align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type fb4ccae0
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
Bug ID: 68563
Summary: LTO bootstrap fails on aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66453
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66453
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 36847 [details]
> gcc6-pr68552.patch
I have started a bootstrap + regtest with the above patch on alpha-linux-gnu
native, please expect results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68562
Bug ID: 68562
Summary: config/i386/morestack.S misaligns stack on x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Jarno ---
The bisection shows that this commit has fixed the issue on trunk:
2015-07-23 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/66916
* match.pd: Guard widen and sign-change comparison simplification
with single
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561
Bug ID: 68561
Summary: An improvement for VRP
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
I enhanced a patch for masked stores movement by guard on zero mask - move all
possible producers for stored value and performance degradation disappeared.
the patch will be re-designed and send for review
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #10 from Jiří Engelthaler ---
Will this bug be resolved in 6.0 release?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36847
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36847&action=edit
gcc6-pr68552.patch
Untested fix. The issue was that the VEC_PERM expansion through vec_shr optab
was misplaced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68357
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Bug ID: 68560
Summary: [6 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now
fails when compiled with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Bug ID: 68559
Summary: Excessive peeling for gaps
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linux at carewolf dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385
--- Comment #5 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 68368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68368
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68368
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from chrb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #24 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:56:24 2015
New Revision: 230968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DWARF: fix loc. descr. generation for DW_AT_static_link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
Bug ID: 68558
Summary: Fails to SLP loop
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66238
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:07:55 2015
New Revision: 230964
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230964&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Bernd Edlinger
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:01:26 2015
New Revision: 230963
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230963&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/68555
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557
Bug ID: 68557
Summary: Missed x86 peephole optimization for multiplying by a
bool
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 13:51:40 2015
New Revision: 230961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/68554
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323
Bug 67323 depends on bug 66721, which changed state.
Bug 66721 Summary: [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 13:46:59 2015
New Revision: 230956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66721
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
