https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #7)
> I'll commit the same patch into gcc-5 branch on next week after some testing
> the patch on trunk.
Please note that I have fixed the wrong PR number in the test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66713
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66713
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
#include
float *ptr;
std::atomic aptr;
template
T cas_original (T cmp_, T val_) {
T old;
__asm volatile(
"lock; cmpxchgq %2, %3"
: "=a" (old), "=m" (ptr)
: "r" (val_), "m" (ptr), "0" (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #41 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #40)
> with my 4.9 native compiler built with 4.9 cross compiler for svn
> gcc-4_9-branch. I hope that miscompilation for mpfr is gone for
> bootstrappe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But this isn't the place to propose changes to the ABI, because it's used by
several different compilers and if G++ started emitting a call to a different
version of __cxa_pure_virtual that would break comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Wed Jul 1 01:07:35 2015
New Revision: 225220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225220&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/66686 (dependent template template substitution)
gcc/cp/Chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #21 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed Jul 1 01:02:48 2015
New Revision: 225219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225219&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64833
* [SH] Set length of casesi_worker_1 insn to 8 when f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66618
--- Comment #3 from Keith Thompson ---
It would be easier to argue that gcc accepts "other forms of constant
expressions" if (a) those other forms were documented and (b) they were
accepted at all optimization levels.
Admittedly the standard do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-06-30, at 4:36 PM, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Sorry, I missed that this was after r225000. Does the attached patch fix it?
No, we still have same error.
--
John David Anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
before try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt:
...
:
.omp_data_i_45 = &.omp_data_arr.11;
# DEBUG .omp_data_i => .omp_data_i_45
__ganglocal_ptr.10_47 = __builtin_GOACC_get_ganglocal_ptr ();
#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #40 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #39)
> Can we close this PR as fixed?
I've got
Testsuite summary for MPFR 3.1.3
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716
Bug ID: 66716
Summary: gomp4:
libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-lo
op.c -g ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61240
Divya Jyoti Das changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||divyajyotidas15 at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |6.0
--- Comment #1 from vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715
Bug ID: 66715
Summary: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-{2,3}
.c exec fails -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17)
> Increasing insn lengths unnecessarily might result in some unlucky constant
> pool placements and far branches and some code might get worse. On the
> other hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For c.exp, at -Ofast/-g, this failure looks similar:
...
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-1.c
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host_nonshm=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 (internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714
Bug ID: 66714
Summary: gomp4: libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/atomic_capture-1.c -g
ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
> Testing tentative patch
Bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 went ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #2 from Jason ---
(With due sense of dread:) I note that the __cxxabiv1 seems to have a v1 in it.
Why not define a v2 with a better signature? Although I realise that this is a
quality-of-implementation issue, why should an apparently
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
The misunderstanding was mine -- I had forgotten that a template template can
be instantiated on a template without providing or deducing the arguments for
the latter. Please disregard my comment #4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
Richard Kettlewell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard+gcc at sfere dot
greenend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 35882
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35882&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
ix86_function_regparm has
/* We don't want to use regparm(3) for nested functions as
these use a static chain pointer in the third argument. */
if (local_regparm == 3 &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> Y takes a non-type template argument which isn't provided and can't be
> deduced in the instantiation (i.e., what would the value of N be in Y?)
Can't you say tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66713
Bug ID: 66713
Summary: atomic compare_excahnge_strong create spurious store
for x86-64 at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Y takes a non-type template argument which isn't provided and can't be deduced
in the instantiation (i.e., what would the value of N be in Y?)
Modifying the test case a bit to see the type Clang gives a.a sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> > The code doesn't look valid to me: Y is not a valid template argument for
> > the template template parameter C.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66546
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 30 19:38:12 2015
New Revision: 225206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225206&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/66546: Add gcc_jit_context_set_bool_allow_unreachable_blocks
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66628
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 30 19:27:19 2015
New Revision: 225205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225205&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/66628: add gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option
gcc/jit/Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 35881
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35881&action=edit
A patch
This patch fixes -mtune=i686 and -mtune=i586.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66711
--- Comment #1 from Steffen Müthing ---
I just noticed the wrong filename (error.cc) and driver (cc1plus) in the first
two outputs: I compiled those with g++ instead of gcc, but the same problem is
present in the C frontend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66711
Bug ID: 66711
Summary: GCC does not correctly restore diagnostic state after
pragma GCC diagnostic pop with -Werror
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66712
Bug ID: 66712
Summary: [concepts] variadic concepts cause havoc
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66710
Bug ID: 66710
Summary: Unhelpful error message with unbalanced parenthesis
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I'll commit the same patch into gcc-5 branch on next week after some testing
the patch on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Jun 30 17:40:55 2015
New Revision: 225200
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225200&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-30 Vladimir Makarov
PR debug/66691
* lra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> The code doesn't look valid to me: Y is not a valid template argument for
> the template template parameter C.
But once "struct X" gets instantiated like in the v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And that's not even what similar means anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Whereas versions without "parameter" compile and run fine :
$ cat z_wr_fmt_ice_4.f90
program p
character(4) :: fmt(1) = '(i8)'
integer :: n
read (*, fmt=fmt) n
write (*, fmt=fmt) n
end
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
Bug ID: 66709
Summary: ICE on formatted io with parameter array specifier fmt
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Being described as similar doesn't imply they are identical in every detail.
std::pair and std::tuple are distinct classes with different requirements on
each. If you believe the are required to behave ident
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60365
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66708
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Gerh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66708
Bug ID: 66708
Summary: Possible (minor) improvement on formatted io with
format too short
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66707
Bug ID: 66707
Summary: Endless compilation on wrong usage of common
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66575
--- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Playing around, I've found other cases (wrong code with procedure)
causing endless compilation on my environment, e.g.
$ cat zlctp_1.f90
program p
procedure(g) :: g
procedure(g) :: g
end
$ cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66706
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66552
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
I opened bug 66706.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66706
Bug ID: 66706
Summary: Redundant shift instruction on x >> (n & 32)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 30 15:40:38 2015
New Revision: 225193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225193&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/66653
* decl2.c (is_late_template_attribute): Tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Testing tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Thanks for reporting this. I've started work on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 30 14:31:36 2015
New Revision: 225192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/66653
* cp-tree.h (CP_DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(gdb) p debug_tree (decl)
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x768d0690 precision
32 min max
pointer_to_this >
public external SI file t.ii line 5 co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Poggiali
---
Created attachment 35879
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35879&action=edit
Temporary patch for gcc 4.9.3
A temporary patch masking the problem on gcc 4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
trippels@gcc75 ~ % cat tramp3d-v4.ii
class A {
public:
A();
};
int a = 0;
void foo() {
a = 0;
A b;
for (; a;)
;
}
trippels@gcc75 ~ % g++ -r -nostdlib -O2 -flto -flto-partition=max -fipa-pta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:52:55 2015
New Revision: 225182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225182&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-30 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66704
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (revision 225163)
+++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (working copy)
@@ -4857,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Bug ID: 66705
Summary: [5/6 Regression] section is missing linker error with
-flto -fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:16:01 2015
New Revision: 225180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225180&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66702
* omp-low.c (simd_clone_adjust): Handl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:12:42 2015
New Revision: 225179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66702
* omp-low.c (simd_clone_adjust): Handl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Bug ID: 66704
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vectorizer at
tree-ssanames.c:457
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
Bug ID: 66703
Summary: [4.9] gcc.target/i386/readeflags-1.c aborts on
-march=i586
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00965.html
Unproposing patch, as discussed here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg02086.html
New pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression]|[4.9/5 Regression]
|M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdeyal at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66121
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65874
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Bootstrap also works for me on the GCC 5 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65797
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Known t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66136
--- Comment #14 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Jun 30 10:07:03 2015
New Revision: 225170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225170&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport of r224031 from mainline
2015-06-29 Szabolcs Nagy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 09:57:20 2015
New Revision: 225166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225166&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt-related patches
2015-
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
