https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46393
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47672
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49295
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
"(a = 0) != 0" has a side effect of setting a to 0.
I think in this case, clang is incorrectly warning about it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Bug ID: 64639
Summary: false negative of -Wunused-value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Jan 17 07:35:40 2015
New Revision: 219796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52773
* calls.c (emit_library_call_value): Whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32790
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32790
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Jan 17 07:24:24 2015
New Revision: 219795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/32790
* reginfo.c (reg_scan_mark_refs): Loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64638
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64638
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Forgot to say the obvious: committer in CC is singled out only because of the
context of the error message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64638
Bug ID: 64638
Summary: Build failure with recent futex changes in libstdc++,
likely all non-futex targets
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58357
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jan 17 03:15:52 2015
New Revision: 219793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DR 488
PR libstdc++/58357
* include/bits/algorithmfwd.h (rota
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58357
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
lures...
Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20150116/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/examples-4/e.50.1.c
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
--- Comment #1 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
The problem code is...
static void
gomp_target_init (void)
{
const char *prefix ="libgomp-plugin-";
const char *suffix = ".so.1";
in libgomp/target.c which will need to be enhanced use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60940
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60940
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jan 17 01:23:28 2015
New Revision: 219790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60940
* include/bits/atomic_base.h: Remove atomic in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61525
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64636
--- Comment #2 from Carson Gaspar ---
Removing -fprofile-use also makes the compilation work, so it appears to be a
problem with profile feedback combined with LTO. Either works individually, but
error out if used together.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64636
--- Comment #1 from Carson Gaspar ---
Created attachment 34467
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34467&action=edit
preprocessed regex.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63708
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63713
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64449
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jan 17 00:21:41 2015
New Revision: 219785
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219785&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/56785
* include/std/tuple (_Tuple_impl): Remove zer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64578
--- Comment #10 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
This fixes the other part of the problem:
*** gfc_trans_pointer_assignment (gfc_expr *
*** 6917,6922
--- 7033,7039
rse.expr = gfc_class_data_get (rse.e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64477
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
It is hard for me to consider the PR RA fault. The pseudo 90 gets memory as
its cost 3000 for DIREG (4000 for any general reg) and 2000 for memory.
2: r90:SI=di:SI
REG_DEAD di:SI
8: r95:V4S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64637
Bug ID: 64637
Summary: Incorrect location for -Wunused-value warnings in
for-loop
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62249
Cristian RodrÃguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crrodriguez at opensuse dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64636
Bug ID: 64636
Summary: Bootstrapping gcc-4.9.2 fails if lto is enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60922
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from janus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64607
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64607
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Jan 16 20:51:14 2015
New Revision: 219772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219772&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libffi/64607
* Makefile.am (AM_MAKEFLAGS): Use double quotes on sub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36433
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37052
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38395
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48551
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48554
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christos at zoulas dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56602
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59710
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
Bug ID: 64635
Summary: darwin produces libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.1.dylib but
tries to load libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.so.1
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59710
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
You need to use Bugzilla with your @gcc.gnu.org address to have rights to
modify bugs. @gcc.gnu.org accounts should have such rights automatically,
though overseers should be able to grant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59572
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63829
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw ---
arm linux code should always be using the _S_atomic sequences. When the
processor doesn't have the required instructions, kernel helper routines will
be used. This ensures that code is forwards compatibl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62134
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59710
--- Comment #4 from Sandra Loosemore ---
I'm thinking this isn't an appropriate kind of patch to backport to 4.9 -- it's
a fix for a missed optimization and not a serious bug (wrong code or ICE).
Maybe I'm being exceptionally dense here, but I c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62134
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 16 18:24:52 2015
New Revision: 219766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-16 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/62134
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64634
Bug ID: 64634
Summary: gcov reports catch(...) as not executed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-prof
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62134
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
Ok, I got one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62066
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62066
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Jan 16 18:14:37 2015
New Revision: 219763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR 62066: Call va_end on early return from va_list p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64621
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Well, this really really asks for the function signatures to be updated to
> the
> call ABI at the GIMPLE level...
>
> OTOH, (int) strtol (...) possibly truncat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64614
--- Comment #8 from Dr. David Alan Gilbert ---
Richard: Thanks for the fix, and apologies again for my screwed up regression
test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62134
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Yes, please: the Bug is now fixed for 5.0 but I'm not going to add a testcase
including the whole .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60056
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994
Bug 59994 depends on bug 60056, which changed state.
Bug 60056 Summary: [C++11] ICE in var_defined_without_dynamic_init, at
cp/decl2.c:2876 with TLS static
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60056
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60056
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 16 17:47:43 2015
New Revision: 219760
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219760&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-16 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60056
* g++.dg/tls/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61527
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reverting the whole commit of r201329 does not work either, but produces a
different set of failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_to_type_3.f03 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60056
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Seems unrelated, because this was fixed for 4.9.2. I'm adding the testcase and
closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63464
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or try to deal with this in combine. We have:
(insn 91 90 92 18 (parallel [
(set (reg:DI 149 [ D.1943 ])
(and:DI (reg:DI 147 [ D.1943 ])
(const_int 1 [0x1])))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61527
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63464
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I had a brief look at the #c14 issues.
--- gcc/match.pd.jj2015-01-05 13:07:14.0 +0100
+++ gcc/match.pd2015-01-16 16:27:08.053817209 +0100
@@ -614,6 +614,16 @@ (define_operator_list inver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62276
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62276
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 16 17:10:20 2015
New Revision: 219756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/62276
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62276
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thanks Ville. Works in current 4_9-branch too, thus I'm adding the testcase and
closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64633
Bug ID: 64633
Summary: Can't build LibSSP for Mipsel need to be compile with
-fPIC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58597
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.2
Summary|[c++11] ICE wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47302
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47304
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47526
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Known to fail|4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63250
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > Remove LIBGCC2_LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE target macro.
> >
> > This patch removes the target macro LIBGCC2_LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64616
--- Comment #2 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc configured with --with-arch=armv7-a and
compiling without any -mcpu (so default cpu) the problem is also there:
stmfd sp!, {r4, r5, r6, lr}
mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64632
Bug ID: 64632
Summary: runtime error: member call on address 0x004318a8
which does not point to an object of type 'ios_base'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #58 from Bernd Edlinger ---
IIRC it was first fixed in 4.9.0.
The known to fail above includes 4.9.0 but that is wrong.
Do you think this is still worth to be fixed in 4.8.5 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625
--- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
The code producing this problematic symbol appears to be...
/* Holds a decl for __OFFLOAD_TABLE__. */
static GTY(()) tree offload_symbol_decl;
/* Get the __OFFLOAD_TABLE__ symbol. */
stati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62211
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63250
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #10)
> It occurs to me another possible interpretation of what a unit existence
> might be.
>
> Behind the scenes when opening a unit with no filename we create
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64568
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63607
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64630
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #57 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #56)
> GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
If it's too late to backport this to 4.8 we might as well close this off
targeting it for 4.9.
Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60162
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64353
--- Comment #8 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Fri Jan 16 15:38:21 2015
New Revision: 219748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/64353
* tree-cfg.c (pass_dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625
--- Comment #5 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Does this imply that significant chunks of dead code exists in this merge?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64601
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
With the modified hack below, the testsuite passes, except:
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[34].c those go from xfail to pass, that sounds good
g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr31146.C seems that the scan-tree-dump is too strict
c-c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
*** Bug 63771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
