https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61918
Dmitry Shachnev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61918
Bug ID: 61918
Summary: With -isystem, symlinks are sometimes processed
incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140725 (experimental) [trunk revision 213036] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
$ gcc-4.8 -O3 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61916
Timothy Gu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.9.0 |4.9.1
--- Comment #3 from Timothy Gu ---
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61916
Timothy Gu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-mingw32
Host|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61916
--- Comment #1 from Timothy Gu ---
With `-v`, gcc outputs this:
i686-pc-mingw32.shared-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..
-DPACKAGE_LIB_DIR=\"/home/timothy_gu/mxe/usr/i686-pc-mingw32.shared/lib\"
-I../.. -I/home/timothy_gu/mxe/usr/i686-pc-mingw32.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61916
Bug ID: 61916
Summary: Internal compiler error in
symtab_nonoverwritable_alias with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
Tony Kelman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony at kelman dot net
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
--- Comment #3 from Evandro Menezes ---
In Opteron, there was a path from FP to the GP registers, but not the other way
around. That path was eventually made symmetric in Barcelona only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-05/msg00160.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
> How is this accomplished internally in A53 and A57?
I don't know about A53 and A57 but I can say that for Cavium's Thunder, it does
not go through the load/store unit and there is a direct path between the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
Bug ID: 61915
Summary: [AArch64] Default use of the LRA results in extra code
size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61914
Bug ID: 61914
Summary: [4.10 Regression] wide-int change breaks x32 bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
--- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Left to do: For format strings greater than 80 characters, shift the view of
where the error occurs in the format string so that it will display reasonably
well. (If the error occurs after 80 characters in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60858
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
--- Comment #10 from Linus Torvalds ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
>
> The bad compiler versions are 4.5.0 (when debug_insn came in) to 4.8.3 and
> 4.9.0 and 4.9.1.
Ok, so we have no reasonable way of avoiding the problem compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Linus Torvalds from comment #8)
> Oh, and this is marked as a duplicate of 61801, but that one is marked to be
> in gcc-4.8.3
>
> The particular problem we see in kernel code generation seems to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
--- Comment #8 from Linus Torvalds ---
Oh, and this is marked as a duplicate of 61801, but that one is marked to be in
gcc-4.8.3
The particular problem we see in kernel code generation seems to *not* happen
in 4.8.3 (current fedora 20), and happ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
--- Comment #7 from Linus Torvalds ---
Just for completeness for the original bug report, here's the actual compiler
command line that the kernel uses to generate the *.s file.
gcc -Wp,-MD,kernel/sched/.fair.s.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61913
Bug ID: 61913
Summary: ICE in common_handle_option with -Wodr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> In any case, it seems to me the transformation of cast+round -> lround is only
> valid when:
> - the result is within the range of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912
Bug ID: 61912
Summary: Missed (partial) dead store elimination for structures
on GIMPLE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #61 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Ok, I suppose
>
> lduh[%g3], %g4 ! MEM[base: ptr_110, offset: 0B], min_line
>
> is not an instruction that works with unaligned %g3.
Right, every load must be aligned.
> ;; min_line_10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61911
Victor Porton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61911
Bug ID: 61911
Summary: CONSTRAINT_ERROR in gnatmake
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61779
--- Comment #12 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Yes, you did say it will be fixed in 4.9.2. Sorry.
I did:
export CFLAGS="-ggdb -Og"
export CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
../gcc-4.9.1/configure --prefix=/home/vitti/local/gcc-4.9.1
--disable-lto --with-tune=k8 --enable-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61893
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Fixing bit-ccp with
Index: tree-ssa-ccp.c
===
--- tree-ssa-ccp.c (revision 213040)
+++ tree-ssa-ccp.c (working copy)
@@ -1456,8 +145
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61910
Bug ID: 61910
Summary: undefined computation in trans-expr.c
gfc_conv_cst_int_power
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
Bug ID: 61909
Summary: Small function optimization not applied to small
objects
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61551
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61893
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed by sth like
Index: fold-const.c
===
--- fold-const.c(revision 212388)
+++ fold-const.c(working copy)
@@ -1121,7 +1121,12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56091
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #60 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59837
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61779
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #10)
> I just installed gcc-4.9.1 and it still has this bug.
> It does not even compile itself (divtf3.c) with -Og.
As said it will be fixed in 4.9.2. I've double-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvalds@linux-foundation.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61908
Bug ID: 61908
Summary: load of invalid value for 'expr_t' in interface.c
compare_actual_formal
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61907
Bug ID: 61907
Summary: load of invalid value for 'bool' in trans-array.c
trans_array_constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61906
Bug ID: 61906
Summary: failed to build gcc 4.9.1 on debian wheezy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > From what I understand lround can potentially set errno on a domain error
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61899
--- Comment #2 from hongxu jia ---
The previous fix is incorrect, it caused other build failure.
Here is the new solution:
The gcc-ar.o, gcc-nm.o, gcc-ranlib.o and errors.o included
config.h which was a generated file. But no explicity rule
to c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
--- Comment #4 from Linus Torvalds ---
As I already mentioned to Jakub Jelinek separately in the original email thread
about the kernel problem:
"Note that I don't personally have a reproducer (my machine has
gcc-4.8.3, and I don't see the sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
--- Comment #3 from Linus Torvalds ---
Created attachment 33184
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33184&action=edit
gzipped pre-processed fair.i file
Apparently attaching a file during the initial bug entry creation failed,
pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61905
Bug ID: 61905
Summary: zero variable length array bound in cp-demangle.c
cplus_demangle_print_callback
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Severity|critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
--- Comment #1 from Linus Torvalds ---
Created attachment 33183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33183&action=edit
Buggy result of compilation
This was sent by the reporter of the kernel problem, Michel Dänzer
, at my request
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61903
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
Bug ID: 61904
Summary: Incorrect stack red-zoning on x86-64 code generation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61903
--- Comment #1 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Same runtime error at line 1076 of expmed.c
"&& v == ((HOST_WIDE_INT) 1 << bitsize) - 1)"
compiling pr28045.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61903
Bug ID: 61903
Summary: signed integer overflow in expmed.c
store_fixed_bit_filed_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 25 07:47:36 2014
New Revision: 213046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-07-14 Jakub Jelinek
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61894
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 25 07:44:57 2014
New Revision: 213045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-25 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/61762
PR middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 25 07:44:57 2014
New Revision: 213045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-25 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/61762
PR middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61902
Bug ID: 61902
Summary: signed integer overflow in real.c in real_from_integer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61901
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I am sorry about opening a duplicate.
66 matches
Mail list logo
