https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to tower120 from comment #2)
> Well ok, but what about this?
>
> http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/e3ce8882c68dbef2
>
> Why it copy with wrong number of argument?
It doesn't.
C<>(1, 1, 1) calls the constructor template with three arguments, obviously.
Initializing the return value calls the constructor template with one argument.
(In reply to tower120 from comment #3)
> But wait, we talk about move constructor. But this is a template class.
> Template class can not have move constructor at all.
That's not true.
There is no bug here.
