https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300
Bug ID: 61300
Summary: powerpc64le miscompile with K&R-style function
definition at -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61299
Bug ID: 61299
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Performance regression for the SIMD
rotate operation with GCC vector extensions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61295
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61281
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I assume you're saying it disappeared and then reappeared and you're
> confirming
> the problem exists on the current trunk. Correct?
Sorry for the confusion. I meant
(1) I confirm the memory cor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61298
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think I have seen this bug before. The problem comes from using non-logical
compares for equal but logical compares for the others.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61281
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson ---
I assume you're saying it disappeared and then reappeared and you're confirming
the problem exists on the current trunk. Correct?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61298
Bug ID: 61298
Summary: redundant compare instructions for powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60925
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 5/23/2014 2:00 PM, aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60925
>
> Aaro Koskinen changed:
>
> What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61143
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61143
--- Comment #13 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Fri May 23 19:35:12 2014
New Revision: 210876
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210876&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-23 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/61143
* include/bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61297
Bug ID: 61297
Summary: have an -Wunused-type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60925
Aaro Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61295
--- Comment #3 from Michel Hermier ---
I didn't knew pure virtual could be defined.
I guess it's invalid then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61296
Bug ID: 61296
Summary: Excessive alignment in ix86_data_alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61295
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Michel Hermier from comment #0)
> First one is a plain error, since according to iso c++ say:
> 10.3-15: "Explicit qualification with the scope operator suppresses the
> virtual call mechanism.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61295
--- Comment #1 from Michel Hermier ---
Created attachment 32848
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32848&action=edit
Patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61295
Bug ID: 61295
Summary: g++ Explicit qualification promote call to pure
virtual to resolvable method address without
warning/error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #19 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri May 23 15:52:20 2014
New Revision: 210864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-23 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimization/53787
* params
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61081
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Can we settle on just disabling the warning for system headers? Those are kind
of out of control, but otherwise if you really want it, use ({ }) or make it a
static inline function (as glibc/kernel). For st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61215
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8)
> Vladimir, I don't understand why you haven't used the testcase from
> comment 2.
Sorry, I overlooked the small test. I've just added the test to the t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61215
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri May 23 15:34:03 2014
New Revision: 210863
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210863&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-23 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/61215
* g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61294
Bug ID: 61294
Summary: [4.9 Regression] erroneous memset used with constant
zero length parameter warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61281
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.10.0, 4.9.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61208
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61293
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> > IMNSHO you can't change the value of extra, that is an ABI issue,
> > and -fsanitize=address shouldn't be an A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61293
--- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> IMNSHO you can't change the value of extra, that is an ABI issue,
> and -fsanitize=address shouldn't be an ABI changing option. Consider:
> struct S { S ();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Steffen Hau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steffen at hauihau dot de
--- Comment #210
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57694
Klaus Rudolph changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.1 |4.9.0
Known to fail|4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61293
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61293
Bug ID: 61293
Summary: asan can not find left buffer overflow of
new[]-allocated buffer, frontend help needed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61290
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tower120 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri May 23 10:19:20 2014
New Revision: 210849
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210849&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60793
* testsuite/*: Use 's/\*-\*-freebsd\* /&*-*-dr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 23 10:11:03 2014
New Revision: 210848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210848&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-22 Paul Eggert
PR other/56955
* doc/extend.texi (Fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61292
Bug ID: 61292
Summary: auto keyword to vector reference generates wrong
alignment move
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61215
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61215
--- Comment #7 from Chris Clayton ---
I can confirm that with Vladimir's patch applied to gcc-4.9-20140521,
wine-1.7.19 now compiles successfully.
Thanks everyone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60819
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58539
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 23 09:46:18 2014
New Revision: 210847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-08-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58539
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61291
Bug ID: 61291
Summary: libixion-0.5.0 unable to find boost thread library as
lto1 crashes with segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61044
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (both host and target), powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe
(likewise).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61184
Bug 61184 depends on bug 61266, which changed state.
Bug 61266 Summary: [4.10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstrict-overflow-18.c (test
for bogus messages, line 20)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 23 08:13:59 2014
New Revision: 210846
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210846&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-23 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/61266
* gcc.dg/Wstric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61289
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61289
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
57 matches
Mail list logo
