http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60880
Bug ID: 60880
Summary: Wrong assert in promote_duplicated_reg
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60879
Bug ID: 60879
Summary: Wrong decision in decide_alg
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60878
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.10.0, 4.7.3, 4.9.0
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849
--- Comment #8 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Richard,
Thanks for the quick fix. Are both patches needed? Could you backport your
patches to gcc-4_9 branch?
Thanks,
Dehao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60878
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Explicit Specialization of |Explicit Specialization of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60878
Tolga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60878
Bug ID: 60878
Summary: Explicit Specialization of Inner Template Class In A
Template Class, Using an Enum in Parent Template Class
as Template Argument
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59200
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59200
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Apr 17 21:56:46 2014
New Revision: 209499
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209499&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-17 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59200
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60877
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*-*
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60876
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60876
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Apr 17 21:50:58 2014
New Revision: 209498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209498&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-17 Michael Meissner
PR target/60876
* config/rs600
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60877
Bug ID: 60877
Summary: __attribute__optimize("O0") conflict with static
function at -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60876
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 32627
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32627&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
I'm testing the patch right now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60876
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60876
Bug ID: 60876
Summary: 2014-04-17 change to mqchmode.h breaks PowerPC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60875
--- Comment #2 from thakis at chromium dot org ---
That only works on declarations, not in an expression, right?
(We do have a workaround that works with gcc. But "pragma message" matches the
semantics of what we want to do, and it works with MSVC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60875
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60875
Bug ID: 60875
Summary: `_Pragma("message \"foo\")"` doesn't work in
expression contexts.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59200
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed for 4.9.0. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60870
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60870
--- Comment #6 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Apr 17 19:27:22 2014
New Revision: 209494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/60870
compiler: Don't convert function type for an interfa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60870
--- Comment #5 from Ulrich Weigand ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #4)
> I don't have a PPC system. Can you see if the attached patch to
> gcc/go/gofrontend/expressions.cc fixes the problem?
Yes, this makes bug296.go PASS again on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60439
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
Bug ID: 60874
Summary: FAIL: go.test/test/recover.go execution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10112
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58114
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That change would force compilers to reject currently valid programs that have
well-defined behaviour. Changes that like are not popular.
It is valid in C to pass a pointer to an incomplete type to free(),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60870
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60870
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 32626
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32626&action=edit
possible patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58114
--- Comment #4 from Teodor Petrov ---
@Jonathan Wakely: Do you think the ISO C++ standard people will be willing to
change this behaviour for a future standard? I'm asking in order to know if
there is any point in starting a conversation with them
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32520|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60863
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42945
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to OTIS from comment #6)
>
> gfortran-4.4.5
>
4.4.5 was released almost 4 years. There have numerous
releases since 4.4.5 came out. See comment #5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60823
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32618|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60873
--- Comment #2 from sebastian.heg...@tu-dresden.de ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60867
--- Comment #2 from Kjell Hedstrom ---
Sounds good.
>> the error is in your code not the library
Yes. Code like that is obviously faulty. I am happy that you are considering
putting in a static_assert. From a coders perspective I find it very h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60867
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60873
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59118
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 17 13:50:55 2014
New Revision: 209486
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209486&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-17 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60849
* tree-ssa-prop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at verizon dot net
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
--- Comment #10 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #9)
>
> Cool! Hopefully it goes quickly. After that, I would suggest that you submit
> the patch to gcc-patches and CC Jason Merrill and Dodji Seketeli, either
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60873
Bug ID: 60873
Summary: C++11: template class with const member and default
ctor should fail to compile?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60872
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56781
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 17 12:25:25 2014
New Revision: 209476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/56781
lto-plugin/
* Makefile.am (CFLAGS, LDFLAGS): Filt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56781
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 17 12:23:28 2014
New Revision: 209475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/56781
* libtool-ldflags: Also prefix -static-lib*, -sha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60872
Bug ID: 60872
Summary: Cannot memcpy array of restricted pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
--- Comment #8 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
The patches to fix this bug are available here:
https://github.com/sylvestre/gcc
I am doing the legal FSF papers to be able to apply it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #10 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Thu Apr 17 11:52:44 2014
New Revision: 209474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libcilkrts/
PR other/60644
* runtime/os-unix.c: Replaced all occu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60865
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871
Bug ID: 60871
Summary: internal compiler error: in
possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at
ipa-devirt.c:1510
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This statement is a little ambiguous to me, which is the current situation?
>
> A) There are no plans to alter sigtramp-android.c to support ARM
> architectures below ARMv7. Patches would be accepted thou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60870
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 17 10:09:45 2014
New Revision: 209472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209472&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60847
Forward port from 4.8 branch
2013-07-19 Kirill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 17 10:02:36 2014
New Revision: 209471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209471&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60847
Forward port from 4.8 branch
2013-07-19 Kirill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #24 from John Marino ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #22)
> > Does this mean effectively nothing lower than ARMv7 can build
> > arm-*-linux-androideabi?
>
> Apparently so, but it should be quite easy to fix this in
> sigtr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60861
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'd say it is fine for test to be optimized to 1 at -O2, but am not sure we
want to do that even for -O0 (and if we disable it for -O0, whether we want it
for -Og). Then it will be user's choice whether he wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60868
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58407
--- Comment #7 from Andrzej Krzemienski ---
Just one remark. A warning in this situation is not to just warn about any
deprecated feature, but to indicate something that is very likely to be a bug
(It used to be legal in C++03, so you couldn't leg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60861
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60836
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 17 08:13:53 2014
New Revision: 209469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209469&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-17 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60849
* tree-ssa-prop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.10.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60836
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 17 08:12:58 2014
New Revision: 209468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-17 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/60836
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.10.0
Summary|[4.9/4.10 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.10.0
Summary|[4.9/4.10 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 17 08:09:02 2014
New Revision: 209467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-17 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/60841
* tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60864
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60870
--- Comment #1 from Anton Blanchard ---
I just realised I gave a git commit id from the mirror. The ChangeLog entry is:
+2014-04-14 Chris Manghane
+
+ * go-gcc.cc: Include "convert.h".
+ (Gcc_backend::string_constant_expression): N
78 matches
Mail list logo