http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60872
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef double * __restrict__ T;
void bar (void *);
void
foo (T *a)
{
bar (a);
}
Whether this is valid C++ or not will leave to our C++ folks. Not a regression
of any kind, even g++ 3.2 fails the same way.
Note that in C, you get a warning for this and with explicit cast (bar ((void
*) a);) it is accepted without diagnostics. In C++ it errors even for that,
and for the various C++ *_cast <void *> (a).
